IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05243730.html

Advanced Technologies and Behavioral Biases in Trading: A Qualitative Study on the Use of Technological Tools by Individual Traders
[Technologies avancées et biais comportementaux en trading : Une étude qualitative sur l’usage des dispositifs technologiques par les traders individuels]

Author

Listed:
  • Chaimaa Laamime,

    (École Nationale de Commerce et de Gestion (ENCG), Université Hassan II de Casablanca, Maroc)

  • Karima Mialed

    (École Nationale de Commerce et de Gestion (ENCG), Université Hassan II de Casablanca, Maroc)

Abstract

This study explores the impact of advanced financial technologies—artificial intelligence, predictive algorithms, intelligent trading platforms, and big data—on the decision-making processes of individual traders. Based on qualitative fieldwork with 30 Moroccan traders, the research shows that while digital tools can help reduce cognitive overload and emotional stress, they may also reinforce algorithmic overconfidence, excessive delegation of judgment, or illusions of control. The study highlights that the effects of these technologies are context-dependent, shaped by traders' techno-cognitive profiles, experience, and financial literacy. It contributes to behavioral finance by offering an integrated techno-behavioral perspective in the context of an emerging market.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaimaa Laamime, & Karima Mialed, 2025. "Advanced Technologies and Behavioral Biases in Trading: A Qualitative Study on the Use of Technological Tools by Individual Traders [Technologies avancées et biais comportementaux en trading : Une étude qualitative sur l’usage des dispositifs tech," Post-Print hal-05243730, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05243730
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05243730v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05243730v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    3. Robert J. Shiller, 2003. "From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 83-104, Winter.
    4. Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2001. "Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 261-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tai-Yuen Hon & Massoud Moslehpour & Kai-Yin Woo, 2021. "Review on Behavioral Finance with Empirical Evidence," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(4), pages 15-41, December.
    2. Martin Gold, 2010. "Fiduciary Finance," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13813.
    3. Víctor Alberto Pena & Alina G�mez-Mej�a, 2019. "Effect of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic and optimism bias in stock market forecasts," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 11(2), pages 389-409.
    4. Amari Mouna & Jarboui Anis & David McMillan, 2015. "The factors forming investor’s failure: Is financial literacy a matter? Viewing test by cognitive mapping technique," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1057923-105, December.
    5. Jackson Barngetuny (PhD), 2025. "Behavioral Biases and Real Estate Bubble Formation in Kenya: A Behavioral Finance and Neuroeconomic Perspective," International Journal of Finance and Accounting, IPRJB, vol. 10(4), pages 54-79.
    6. Ahmed Bouteska & Murad Harasheh, 2026. "Decoding the crypto crowd: how social media sentiment predicts Ethereum’s price," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-12, March.
    7. K.S. Muehlfeld & G.U. Weitzel & A. van Witteloostuijn, 2012. "Fight or freeze? Individual differences in investors’ motivational systems and trading in experimental asset markets," Working Papers 12-18, Utrecht School of Economics.
    8. Mateusz Skwarek, 2025. "Why Do Investors Behave Irrationally in the Cryptocurrency and Emerging Stock Markets?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
    9. Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins & Abdullah, Mohammad & Yousaf, Imran & Kumar Tiwari, Aviral & Li, Yanshuang, 2024. "Economic sanctions sentiment and global stock markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Jasman Tuyon & Zamri Ahmada, 2016. "Behavioural finance perspectives on Malaysian stock market efficiency," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 16(1), pages 43-61, March.
    11. repec:rbs:ijbess:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:344-358 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Fabio Della Rossa & Lorenzo Giannini & Pietro DeLellis, 2020. "Herding or wisdom of the crowd? Controlling efficiency in a partially rational financial market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Ramiah, Vikash & Xu, Xiaoming & Moosa, Imad A., 2015. "Neoclassical finance, behavioral finance and noise traders: A review and assessment of the literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 89-100.
    14. Imran Yousaf & Shoaib Ali & Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, 2018. "Herding behavior in Ramadan and financial crises: the case of the Pakistani stock market," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Coskun, Esra Alp & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Kahyaoglu, Hakan, 2020. "Uncertainty and herding behavior: evidence from cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Wen-Jun Xue & Li-Wen Zhang, 2016. "Stock Return Autocorrelations and Predictability in the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from Threshold Quantile Autoregressive Models," Working Papers 1605, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    17. Schneider, Julian & Oehler, Andreas, 2021. "Competition for visibility: When do (FX) signal providers employ lotteries?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Khediri, Karim Ben & Aye, Goodness C. & Gupta, Rangan, 2018. "Time-varying efficiency of developed and emerging bond markets: Evidence from long-spans of historical data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 632-647.
    19. Muhammad Shehryar*, 2025. "The Role of Weather Anomalies in Shaping Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Performance: A Conceptual Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 558-565, March.
    20. Charilaos Mertzanis & Noha Allam, 2018. "Political Instability and Herding Behaviour: Evidence from Egypt’s Stock Market," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(1), pages 29-59, April.
    21. Andrea Antico & Giulio Bottazzi & Daniele Giachini, 2022. "On the evolutionary stability of the sentiment investor," LEM Papers Series 2022/09, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05243730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.