IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05219675.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of the 2015 Reform of the Personalized Autonomy Allowance on the Care Plans Notified to Beneficiaries
[Effet de la réforme de l’APA à domicile de 2015 sur les plans d’aide notifiés aux bénéficiaires]

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Arnault

    (DREES - Centre de Recherche du DREES - Ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité)

  • Jérome Wittwer

    (UB - Université de Bordeaux)

Abstract

The law on the adaptation of society to ageing, which reformed the home care allow- ance APA, entered into force on 1 March 2016. This article aims to study the effect of this on the amounts proposed in plans by the medical and welfare teams (EMS), first theoretically and then empirically, on more than 300,000 beneficiaries in 2011 and 2017. The analysis is based on individual data from the statistical services of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (DREES). The average amount offered to beneficiaries assessed as belonging to the iso‑resource group of dependence (GIR) 3, 2 or 1 saw a respective increase of €16, €49 and €57 between 2011 and 2017. The amount offered to most beneficiaries allocated to GIR 4 decreased, other things being equal. Within each GIR, in 2017, the amounts granted are more widely distributed, in both directions, which suggests that constraints on départements' council budgets have led EMS to cut allowances for people with relatively more autonomy so as to provide more funding for the most severely dependent people.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Arnault & Jérome Wittwer, 2021. "The Effect of the 2015 Reform of the Personalized Autonomy Allowance on the Care Plans Notified to Beneficiaries [Effet de la réforme de l’APA à domicile de 2015 sur les plans d’aide notifiés aux b," Post-Print hal-05219675, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05219675
    DOI: 10.24187/ecostat.2021.524d.2042
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05219675v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05219675v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24187/ecostat.2021.524d.2042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izabela Jelovac & Philippe Polomé, 2017. "Incentives to patients versus incentives to health care providers: The users' perspective," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 319-331, December.
    2. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Agnès Gramain & Helen Lim & Jingyue Xing, 2014. "Impact du reste à charge sur le volume d'heures d'aide à domicile utilisé par les bénéficiaires de l'APA," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14024, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Gabrielle Fack & Camille Landais, 2010. "Are Tax Incentives for Charitable Giving Efficient? Evidence from France," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 117-141, May.
    4. Hong H. & Chernozhukov V., 2002. "Three-Step Censored Quantile Regression and Extramarital Affairs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 872-882, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bönke, Timm & Werdt, Clive, 2015. "Charitable giving and its persistent and transitory reactions to changes in tax incentives: Evidence from the German taxpayer panel," Discussion Papers 2015/2, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Michael Berlemann & Marc-André Luik, 2014. "Institutional Reform and Depositors' Portfolio Choice - Evidence from Censored Quantile Regressions," CESifo Working Paper Series 4782, CESifo.
    3. Timm Bönke & Nima Massarrat-Mashhadi & Christian Sielaff, 2013. "Charitable giving in the German welfare state: fiscal incentives and crowding out," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 39-58, January.
    4. Seoyun Hong, 2023. "Censored Quantile Regression with Many Controls," Papers 2303.02784, arXiv.org.
    5. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Lequien, Matthieu & Stantcheva, Stefanie, 2017. "Tax simplicity and heterogeneous learning," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86613, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    7. Adena, Maja, 2021. "Tax-price elasticity of charitable donations – evidence from the German taxpayer panel," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 219-235.
    8. Elisa Casi & Mohammed Mardan & Rohit Reddy Muddasani, 2022. "So close and yet so far: the ability of mandatory disclosure rules to crack down on offshore tax evasion," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-116, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Antoine Bozio & Brice Fabre & Jonathan Goupille & Quentin Lafféter, 2012. "Le modèle de micro-simulation TAXIPP -Version 0.2," Working Papers halshs-02514252, HAL.
    10. Ian Smith, 2012. "Reinterpreting the economics of extramarital affairs," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-343, September.
    11. Joshua Graff Zivin & Matthew Neidell, 2012. "The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3652-3673, December.
    12. Almunia, Miguel & Guceri, Irem & Lockwood, Ben & Scharf, Kimberley, 2020. "More giving or more givers? The effects of tax incentives on charitable donations in the UK," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Chen, Xirong & Li, Degui & Li, Qi & Li, Zheng, 2019. "Nonparametric estimation of conditional quantile functions in the presence of irrelevant covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 433-450.
    14. Chandrayee Chatterjee & James C. Cox & Michael K. Price & Florian Rundhammer, 2020. "Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Understanding How State Tax Credits Impact Charitable Giving," NBER Working Papers 27163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Asatryan, Zareh & Joulfaian, David, 2022. "Taxes and Business Philanthropy in Armenia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 914-930.
    16. Fack, Gabrielle & Landais, Camille, 2016. "The effect of tax enforcement on tax elasticities: Evidence from charitable contributions in France," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 23-40.
    17. Ji, Yonggang & Lin, Nan & Zhang, Baoxue, 2012. "Model selection in binary and tobit quantile regression using the Gibbs sampler," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 827-839.
    18. P. Čížek & S. Sadikoglu, 2018. "Bias-corrected quantile regression estimation of censored regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 215-247, March.
    19. Julia Cagé & Malka Guillot, 2021. "Is Charitable Giving Political? Evidence from Wealth and Income Tax Returns," Working Papers hal-03877993, HAL.
    20. Ayala, Diana & Nedeljkovic, Milan & Saborowski, Christian, 2017. "What slice of the pie? The corporate bond market boom in emerging economies," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 16-35.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05219675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.