IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05219675.html

The Effect of the 2015 Reform of the Personalized Autonomy Allowance on the Care Plans Notified to Beneficiaries
[Effet de la réforme de l’APA à domicile de 2015 sur les plans d’aide notifiés aux bénéficiaires]

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Arnault

    (DREES - Centre de Recherche du DREES - Ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité)

  • Jérome Wittwer

    (UB - Université de Bordeaux)

Abstract

The law on the adaptation of society to ageing, which reformed the home care allow- ance APA, entered into force on 1 March 2016. This article aims to study the effect of this on the amounts proposed in plans by the medical and welfare teams (EMS), first theoretically and then empirically, on more than 300,000 beneficiaries in 2011 and 2017. The analysis is based on individual data from the statistical services of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (DREES). The average amount offered to beneficiaries assessed as belonging to the iso‑resource group of dependence (GIR) 3, 2 or 1 saw a respective increase of €16, €49 and €57 between 2011 and 2017. The amount offered to most beneficiaries allocated to GIR 4 decreased, other things being equal. Within each GIR, in 2017, the amounts granted are more widely distributed, in both directions, which suggests that constraints on départements' council budgets have led EMS to cut allowances for people with relatively more autonomy so as to provide more funding for the most severely dependent people.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Arnault & Jérome Wittwer, 2021. "The Effect of the 2015 Reform of the Personalized Autonomy Allowance on the Care Plans Notified to Beneficiaries [Effet de la réforme de l’APA à domicile de 2015 sur les plans d’aide notifiés aux bénéficiaires]," Post-Print hal-05219675, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05219675
    DOI: 10.24187/ecostat.2021.524d.2042
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05219675v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05219675v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24187/ecostat.2021.524d.2042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Agnès Gramain & Helen Lim & Jingyue Xing, 2014. "Impact du reste à charge sur le volume d'heures d'aide à domicile utilisé par les bénéficiaires de l'APA," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14024, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Gabrielle Fack & Camille Landais, 2010. "Are Tax Incentives for Charitable Giving Efficient? Evidence from France," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 117-141, May.
    3. Izabela Jelovac & Philippe Polomé, 2017. "Incentives to patients versus incentives to health care providers: The users' perspective," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 319-331, December.
    4. Hong H. & Chernozhukov V., 2002. "Three-Step Censored Quantile Regression and Extramarital Affairs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 872-882, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bönke, Timm & Werdt, Clive, 2015. "Charitable giving and its persistent and transitory reactions to changes in tax incentives: Evidence from the German taxpayer panel," Discussion Papers 2015/2, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Luik, Marc-André & Berlemann, Michael, 2014. "Institutional Reform and Depositors’ Portfolio Choice: Evidence from Censored Quantile Regressions," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100291, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Timm Bönke & Nima Massarrat-Mashhadi & Christian Sielaff, 2013. "Charitable giving in the German welfare state: fiscal incentives and crowding out," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 39-58, January.
    4. Seoyun Hong, 2023. "Censored Quantile Regression with Many Controls," Papers 2303.02784, arXiv.org.
    5. Peter G. Backus & Nicky L. Grant, 2019. "How sensitive is the average taxpayer to changes in the tax-price of giving?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(2), pages 317-356, April.
    6. Marianne Tenand, 2018. "Being dependent rather than handicapped in France: Does the institutional barrier at 60 affect care arrangements?," Working Papers halshs-01889452, HAL.
    7. Adena, Maja, 2021. "Tax-price elasticity of charitable donations – evidence from the German taxpayer panel," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 219-235.
    8. Elisa Casi & Mohammed Mardan & Rohit Reddy Muddasani, 2022. "So close and yet so far: the ability of mandatory disclosure rules to crack down on offshore tax evasion," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-116, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Antoine Bozio & Brice Fabre & Jonathan Goupille & Quentin Lafféter, 2012. "Le modèle de micro-simulation TAXIPP -Version 0.2," Working Papers halshs-02514252, HAL.
    10. Ian Smith, 2012. "Reinterpreting the economics of extramarital affairs," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-343, September.
    11. Abi Adams & Richard Blundell & Martin Browning & Ian Crawford, 2015. "Prices versus preferences: taste change and revealed preference," IFS Working Papers W15/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    12. Joshua Graff Zivin & Matthew Neidell, 2012. "The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3652-3673, December.
    13. Almunia, Miguel & Guceri, Irem & Lockwood, Ben & Scharf, Kimberley, 2020. "More giving or more givers? The effects of tax incentives on charitable donations in the UK," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Keller, Elena & Ortmann, Andreas & Chambers, Georgina Mary, 2024. "Exploring the demand for elective egg freezing: A laboratory experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Chen, Xirong & Li, Degui & Li, Qi & Li, Zheng, 2019. "Nonparametric estimation of conditional quantile functions in the presence of irrelevant covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 433-450.
    16. YoungRok Kim, 2023. "Effects of tax benefits on the price elasticity of charitable contributions in South Korea," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 206-217, May.
    17. Firpo, Sergio & Galvao, Antonio F. & Pinto, Cristine & Poirier, Alexandre & Sanroman, Graciela, 2022. "GMM quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 432-452.
    18. Chandrayee Chatterjee & James C. Cox & Michael K. Price & Florian Rundhammer, 2020. "Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Understanding How State Tax Credits Impact Charitable Giving," NBER Working Papers 27163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Giedre Lideikyte Huber & Marta Pittavino, 2022. "Who donates and how? New evidence on the tax incentives in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 758-797, September.
    20. Asatryan, Zareh & Joulfaian, David, 2022. "Taxes and Business Philanthropy in Armenia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 914-930.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05219675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.