IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05181098.html

Farmers' access, demand, and satisfaction with innovation support services and their determinants: The case of the cocoa sector in Central Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Urcil Papito Kenfack Essougong

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Maja Slingerland

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Syndhia Mathe

    (UMR Innovation - Innovation et Développement dans l'Agriculture et l'Alimentation - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

  • Ken E. Giller

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Cees Leeuwis

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

Abstract

Purpose : We assessed cocoa farmers' access to, demand for, and satisfaction with five innovation support services and the factors shaping them. Design/methodology/approach : We used data from 10 focus groups and a survey of 421 farmers in Central Cameroon. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and regression models. Findings: Results showed that farmers mostly receive training and advice whereas inputs, credit, and equipment are the most demanded services. Training and advice obtained the highest perceived quality score. Conflicts around distribution and capture by leaders were relatively frequent regarding inputs and equipment. Farmers' satisfaction with service outcomes increased with the number of services received and any services above training and advice yielded higher outcomes. Location, involvement in certification, seniority, and leadership position in farmers' organisations were significantly associated with access and demand for at least two services while satisfaction with quality was mostly influenced by prior services received and the extent to which they matched expectations. Practical implications: Farmers' demands for services are diverse, hence the importance of providing them with either service bundles or options from which they can choose. Additional efforts are needed from service providers to create an enabling environment for the implementation of the disseminated sustainable management practices. Theoretical implications: Farmers' satisfaction with services can be analysed from different perspectives. Both endogenous and exogenous factors determine access to, demand for, and satisfaction with services.

Suggested Citation

  • Urcil Papito Kenfack Essougong & Maja Slingerland & Syndhia Mathe & Ken E. Giller & Cees Leeuwis, 2024. "Farmers' access, demand, and satisfaction with innovation support services and their determinants: The case of the cocoa sector in Central Cameroon," Post-Print hal-05181098, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05181098
    DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2023.2249501
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05181098v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05181098v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1389224X.2023.2249501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guy Faure & Andrea Knierim & Alex Koutsouris & Hycenth Tim Ndah & Sarah Audouin & Elena Zarokosta & Eelke Wielinga & Bernard Triomphe & Syndhia Mathé & Ludovic Temple & Kevin Heanue, 2019. "How to Strengthen Innovation Support Services in Agriculture with Regard to Multi-Stakeholder Approaches," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 145-169.
    2. Collins Asante-Addo & Jonathan Mockshell & Manfred Zeller & Khalid Siddig & Irene S. Egyir, 2017. "Agricultural credit provision: what really determines farmers’ participation and credit rationing?," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 77(2), pages 239-256, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boscow Okumu & Herbert Ntuli & Edwin Muchapondwa & Gibson Mudiriza & Alfred Mukong, 2024. "Does the uptake of multiple climate smart agriculture practices enhance household savings, food security and household vulnerability to climate change? Insights from Zimbabwe," ERSA Working Paper Series 44, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    2. Liu, Bei & Ren, Baoping & Jin, Fei, 2025. "Does climate risk affect the ease of access to credit for farmers? Evidence from CHFS," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Kumar, Anjani & Sonkar, Vinay Kumar & S., Aditya K., 2021. "Assessing the impact of lending through Kisan Credit Cards in rural India: Evidence from eastern India," IFPRI discussion papers 1997, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Kuhn, Lena & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor, 2023. "The role of risk rationing in rural credit demand and uptake: lessons from Kyrgyzstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 83(1), pages 1-20.
    5. repec:jaf:journl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:n:494 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tchékpo Fortuné OGOUVIDE & Ygué Patrice ADEGBOLA & Afio ZANNOU & Gauthier BIAOU, 2022. "Determinants of Farmer’s Participation in Formal Microcredit Markets in Benin," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 13(2), pages 77-95, December.
    7. Tim Ölkers & Oliver Mußhoff, 2024. "Exploring the role of interest rates, macroeconomic environment, agricultural cycle, and gender on loan demand in the agricultural sector: Evidence from Mali," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 484-512, April.
    8. Jisha, K K & Palakkeel, Prashobhan, 2023. "Availability of agricultural credit: determinants, marginal effect, and predicted probability," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    9. Anjani Kumar & Vinay K. Sonkar & K. S. Aditya, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Lending Through Kisan Credit Cards in Rural India: Evidence from Eastern India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(3), pages 602-622, June.
    10. Ayodeji Ogunleye & Ayodeji Kehinde & Abiodun Ogundeji & Ronke Orimogunje, 2025. "Does microcredit have any impact on profit efficiency? Evidence from smallholder poultry farmers in Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13611-13637, June.
    11. Benjamin Tetteh Anang & Joseph Amerino, 2024. "Drivers of Cocoa Farmers’ Access to Agricultural Services in Ghana: A Case Study of Sefwi Wiawso Municipal," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    12. Ngaruko, Deus D., 2022. "Transaction Costs of Group Microfinancing Models and their Effects on Family-Owned Business Performance in Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(4), September.
    13. Hong Sun & Valentina Hartarska & Lezhu Zhang & Denis Nadolnyak, 2018. "The Influence of Social Capital on Farm Household’s Borrowing Behavior in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Fenitra Josiane Rakotondrabearimino & Sarah Audouin & Holimalala Randriamanampisoa & Bruno Salomon Ramamonjisoa & Chloé Lecomte, 2025. "Supporting agricultural innovation in Madagascar: how do organizations operate? A comparative analysis of their theories of change [Accompagner l'innovation agricole à Madagascar, comment les organisations interviennent ? Analyse comparative de le," Post-Print hal-05484763, HAL.
    15. Anette Ruml & Martin C. Parlasca, 2022. "In‐kind credit provision through contract farming and formal credit markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 402-425, April.
    16. Elena Feo & Sylvia Burssens & Hannes Mareen & Pieter Spanoghe, 2022. "Shedding Light into the Need of Knowledge Sharing in H2020 Thematic Networks for the Agriculture and Forestry Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Balana, Bedru B. & Mekonnen, Dawit & Haile, Beliyou & Hagos, Fitsum & Yimam, Seid & Ringler, Claudia, 2022. "Demand and supply constraints of credit in smallholder farming: Evidence from Ethiopia and Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Maria, Kernecker & Maria, Busse & Andrea, Knierim, 2021. "Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Mockshell, Jonathan, 2021. "Climate-smart cowpea adoption and welfare effects of comprehensive agricultural training programs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Abera Alemu & Zerhun Ganewo, 2023. "Impact Analysis of Formal Microcredit on Income of Borrowers in Rural Areas of Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 65-85, March.
    21. Guy Faure & Aurélie Toillier & Sarah Audouin & Syndhia Mathe & Bernard Triomphe & Ludovic Temple, 2019. "Evaluación de los sistemas de innovación agropecuaria para el diseño de políticas públicas: una revisión de la literatura," Post-Print hal-05174349, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05181098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.