IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04927963.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stakeholder perceptions in organizational crisis management: exploring alternative configurations

Author

Listed:
  • Orlando Contreras-Pacheco

    (UIS - Universidad Industrial de Santander [Bucaramanga], ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Cyrlene Claasen

    (UIS - Universidad Industrial de Santander [Bucaramanga])

  • Fernando Garrigós-Simón

    (UPV - Universitat Politècnica de València = Universitad Politecnica de Valencia = Polytechnic University of Valencia)

Abstract

Crises are socially constructed. Affected stakeholders of an organizational crisis conceive complex associations between their perceptions of the implicated company's response and about the company itself. The study moves away from a simple cause–effect view by deriving alternative configurations of these associations. This approach allows for a better understanding of how stakeholders attribute responsibility for a critical event and the resulting crisis faced by the company that caused it. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, we analyze insights of 325 families affected by an environmental incident in 2018 involving Colombia's largest company. We establish a correlation between stakeholders' perceptions of crisis response timeliness and credibility. Accordingly, we expand on how perceptions affect organizational judgments. Finally, we propose that trustworthiness and reputation are antecedents to how organizational crisis response is perceived and how these antecedents affect the degree of the severity of the company crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Orlando Contreras-Pacheco & Cyrlene Claasen & Fernando Garrigós-Simón, 2022. "Stakeholder perceptions in organizational crisis management: exploring alternative configurations," Post-Print hal-04927963, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04927963
    DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2022.55
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04927963v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04927963v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1017/jmo.2022.55?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orlando Contreras-Pacheco & Cyrlene Claasen, 2018. "Mired in deception: escalating an environmental disaster in Colombia," Post-Print hal-01998404, HAL.
    2. Michelle Greenwood & Harry Buren III, 2010. "Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 425-438, September.
    3. Kaya, Bahar & Abubakar, A. Mohammed & Behravesh, Elaheh & Yildiz, Harun & Mert, Ibrahim Sani, 2020. "Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 278-289.
    4. Balaji, M.S. & Jiang, Yangyang & Jha, Subhash, 2021. "Nanoinfluencer marketing: How message features affect credibility and behavioral intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 293-304.
    5. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    6. Tho, Nguyen Dinh & Trang, Nguyen Thi Mai, 2015. "Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1332-1340.
    7. Jay B. Barney & Mark H. Hansen, 1994. "Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 175-190, December.
    8. Claeys, An-Sofie & Cauberghe, Verolien & Pandelaere, Mario, 2016. "Is old news no news? The impact of self-disclosure by organizations in crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3963-3970.
    9. Claeys, An-Sofie, 2017. "Better safe than sorry: Why organizations in crisis should never hesitate to steal thunder," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 305-311.
    10. Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Patel, Vijay K. & Wanzenried, Gabrielle, 2014. "A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 116-128.
    11. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    13. Bartikowski, Boris & Walsh, Gianfranco & Beatty, Sharon E., 2011. "Culture and age as moderators in the corporate reputation and loyalty relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 966-972, September.
    14. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Saridakis, Charalampos & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2018. "Examining relationship value in cross-border business relationships: A comparison between correlational and configurational approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 280-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tolin, Giovanni & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2025. "Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configurational perspective on organizational factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Cousté Philippe Emmanuel & Su Qin & Syed Far Abid Hossain & Md. Rashed, 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Device System Quality on Mobile Shopping Adoption among University Students: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Approaches," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    3. Samuel Fosso Wamba & Maciel M. Queiroz & Ilias O. Pappas & Yulia Sullivan, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Capability and Firm Performance: A Sustainable Development Perspective by the Mediating Role of Data-Driven Culture," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 2189-2203, December.
    4. Bozic, Branko & Kuppelwieser, Volker G., 2019. "Customer trust recovery: An alternative explanation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 208-218.
    5. Božič, Branko & Siebert, Sabina & Martin, Graeme, 2020. "A grounded theory study of factors and conditions associated with customer trust recovery in a retailer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 440-448.
    6. Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir & Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid & Ishraq Jerin & Ahmad Shaharudin Abdul Latiff & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty to electronic home appliances in Bangladesh: the contingent role of brand trust," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-35, June.
    7. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Pérez-Macías, Noemí & Fernández-Fernádez, José Luis, 2023. "The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Kougiannou, Nadia K. & O'Meara Wallis, Matthew, 2020. "‘Chimneys don't belch out carnations!’ The (in)tolerance of corporate hypocrisy: A case study of trust and community engagement strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 348-362.
    9. Jahn, Johannes & Brühl, Rolf, 2019. "Can bad news be good? On the positive and negative effects of including moderately negative information in CSR disclosures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 117-128.
    10. Yan, Ying & Chen, Hongquan & Shao, Bingjia & Lei, Yuanyang, 2023. "How IT affordances influence customer engagement in live streaming commerce? A dual-stage analysis of PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Theerasak Nitlarp & Theeraya Mayakul, 2023. "The Implications of Triple Transformation on ESG in the Energy Sector: Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Findings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Acquah, Innocent Senyo Kwasi & Quaicoe, Judith & Gatsi, John Gartchie, 2024. "Modelling circular economy capabilities and sustainable manufacturing practices for environmental performance: Assessing linear (PLS-SEM) and non-linear (fsQCA) effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Shi, Xiaoxiao & Evans, Richard & Shan, Wei, 2022. "Solver engagement in online crowdsourcing communities: The roles of perceived interactivity, relationship quality and psychological ownership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Sukhov, Alexandre & Friman, Margareta & Olsson, Lars E., 2023. "Unlocking potential: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM, NCA, and fsQCA for informed decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Sun Young Lee & Weiwu Zhang & Alan Abitbol, 2019. "What Makes CSR Communication Lead to CSR Participation? Testing the Mediating Effects of CSR Associations, CSR Credibility, and Organization–Public Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 413-429, June.
    16. Merle Ojasoo, 2016. "CSR reporting, stakeholder engagement and preventing hypocrisy through ethics audit," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Wang, Dongyi & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Hua, Ying & Benitez, Jose, 2023. "Customers’ help-seeking propensity and decisions in brands’ self-built live streaming E-Commerce: A mixed-methods and fsQCA investigation from a dual-process perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Emily Bacon & Michael D. Williams & Gareth H. Davies, 2023. "On the Combinatory Nature of Knowledge Transfer Conditions: A Mixed Method Assessment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1039-1061, June.
    19. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.
    20. Prommer, Lisa & Tiberius, Victor & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Exploring the future of startup leadership development," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04927963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.