IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04688954.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quand l’innovation sociale renouvelle l’action publique. Un regard croisé sur les expériences française et coréenne de l’ESS

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Bidet

    (ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université)

  • Nadine Richez-Battesti

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this article, we compare the institutionalization of the social and solidarity economy (SSE) in two countries, South Korea and France, which have chosen to develop specific public policies dedicated to the SSE. Our analysis aims to show how social innovation driven by the SSE contributes to renewing public policies. In response to this question, we observe a process of homogenization and differentiation. On the one hand, we show that the processes of institutionalization of the SSE unfold according to two conceptions of social innovation that illustrate two facets of the renewal of public action. In Korea, they are based on the production of goods and services with a social purpose by private players, while in France they are based on co-construction processes that have been widely tested by SSE players, but are still incomplete. On the other hand, we observe a process of convergence between the two countries, based on the growing heterogeneity of SSE players in each national context.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Bidet & Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2024. "Quand l’innovation sociale renouvelle l’action publique. Un regard croisé sur les expériences française et coréenne de l’ESS," Post-Print hal-04688954, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04688954
    DOI: 10.1684/pmp.2024.37
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04688954v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04688954v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1684/pmp.2024.37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Bovaird & Sophie Flemig & Elke Loeffler & Stephen P. Osborne, 2019. "How far have we come with co-production—and what’s next?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 229-232, May.
    2. Taco Brandsen & Victor Pestoff, 2006. "Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 493-501, December.
    3. Carola van Eijk & Trui Steen & Bram Verschuere, 2017. "Co-producing safety in the local community: A Q-methodology study on the incentives of Belgian and Dutch members of neighbourhood watch schemes," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 323-343, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING, 2022. "Conclusions and Directions for further Research," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 259-274, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    2. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING (ed.), 2022. "New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 3, number css3, December.
    3. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Vrangbæk, Karsten & Scheele, Christian Elling & Kriegbaum, Margit, 2018. "Voluntary associations and co-production of health promoting activities for older adults: Experiences and policy lessons from Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(11), pages 1255-1259.
    5. Holstenkamp, Lars & Degenhart, Heinrich, 2013. "Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle für erneuerbare Energien - Eine Begriffsbestimmung aus finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive [Citizen Participation Schemes for Renewable Energies - A Definition from a Finan," MPRA Paper 81263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Giorgia Trasciani, 2024. "Governance in Crisis. Examining the Role of TSOs in Asylum Seekers Reception in France and Italy," Post-Print hal-04846784, HAL.
    7. Bobby Macaulay, 2016. "Considering social enterprise involvement in the commissioning of health services in Shetland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(5), pages 650-659, August.
    8. Roy, Michael J. & Donaldson, Cam & Baker, Rachel & Kerr, Susan, 2014. "The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 182-193.
    9. Kate Mclaughlin & Stephen P. Osborne & Celine Chew, 2009. "Relationship marketing, relational capital and the future of marketing in public service organizations," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 35-42, January.
    10. Annette Quayle & Johanne Grosvold & Larelle Chapple, 2019. "New modes of managing grand challenges: Cross-sector collaboration and the refugee crisis of the Asia Pacific," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 665-686, November.
    11. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    12. Holanda Bruna de Morais & Mendonça Patricia Maria Emerenciano de, 2024. "Analytical Lens for Investigating CSOs and State Relations: The Contributions of Coproduction and Institutional Logics Perspectives," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 27-47, January.
    13. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Marco Mastrodascio & Luca Tricarico, 2022. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Public/Third-Sector Collaboration in the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Lorenzo Dorigo & Giuseppe Marcon, 2014. "A caring interpretation of stakeholder management for the social enterprise. Evidence from a regional survey of micro social cooperatives in the Italian welfare mix," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    16. Edward McPhail & Vlad Tarko, 2017. "The evolution of governance structures in a polycentric system," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 16, pages 290-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Gabriela Vaceková & Mária Svidroòová, 2012. "The non-government organizations in Slovakia and Austria and the current state of their self-financing," MUNI ECON Working Papers 06, Masaryk University, revised Mar 2013.
    18. Florence JANY-CATRICE, 2020. "Une économie politique des mesures d’impact social," CIRIEC Working Papers 2014, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    19. Adam Fforde, 2022. "Understanding how systemic change happens -marketisation and de-marketisation," Post-Print hal-03677990, HAL.
    20. Aksel Ersoy, 2016. "The spread of coproduction: How the concept reached the northernmost city in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(3), pages 410-423, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04688954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.