IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04647414.html

Capturing institutional change dynamics in public policy fields: a realist literature review on institutional work
[Le dynamiques de changement institutionnel au sein de champs de politique publique : une revue réaliste de la littérature sur le travail institutionnel]

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Rodriguez-Tabarquino -

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Solange Hernandez

    (AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Tiberghien Bruno

    (AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Contrary to common perceptions that institutions are unyielding ‘rules of the game' requiring no effort for their preservation, evidence suggests they are far from static and require active engagement to adapt and evolve. Dynamics of change are critical in the face of diverse pressures including social movements, the climate emergency, government reforms, and technological innovations, to ensure their legitimacy and continuity. Exploring these dynamics, a stream of research within organisational institutionalism has been dedicated to understanding how individual and collective actions influence, shape, and transform the institutions that underpin our daily lives. Through a realist literature review, we examine research on institutional work (IW) applied in public policy fields—a conceptual proposition we introduce—to elucidate how public policy implementation leads actors to engage in practices of creation, maintenance, or disruption. Adhering to RAMESES standards, we adopted a PRISMA-aligned protocol, selecting 74 articles for content analysis focused on inter-organisational interactions. Our findings uncover emergent categories of IW across multiple public policies, highlighting their role in fostering institutional change and continuity. We identify significant gaps in existing literature, particularly in the understanding of the symbolic, material, and relational dimensions of IW practices, and the critical convergence between IW and institutional logics to enhance our understanding of change processes in public sector institutions. This review contributes to the research stream by offering a comprehensive synthesis of IW at the field level, proposing a research agenda for exploring IW's potential in addressing public sector challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Rodriguez-Tabarquino - & Solange Hernandez & Tiberghien Bruno, 2024. "Capturing institutional change dynamics in public policy fields: a realist literature review on institutional work [Le dynamiques de changement institutionnel au sein de champs de politique publique : une revue réaliste de la littérature sur le tr," Post-Print hal-04647414, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04647414
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04647414v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04647414v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Canales, 2016. "From Ideals to Institutions: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Mexican Small Business Finance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1548-1573, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Héloïse Berkowitz, 2020. "Participatory Governance for the Development of the Blue Bioeconomy in the Mediterranean Region," Working Papers hal-02555685, HAL.
    2. Mindel, Vitali & Overstreet, Robert E. & Sternberg, Henrik & Mathiassen, Lars & Phillips, Nelson, 2024. "Digital activism to achieve meaningful institutional change: A bricolage of crowdsourcing, social media, and data analytics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    3. Patrick Haack & Oliver Schilke & Lynne Zucker, 2021. "Legitimacy Revisited: Disentangling Propriety, Validity, and Consensus," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 749-781, May.
    4. Yinghui Chen & Xiaolin Gong & Chien-Chi Chu & Yang Cao, 2018. "Access to the Internet and Access to Finance: Theory and Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-38, July.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:kc4a3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Irina Skuratovych & Nataliia Lytvyn & Iryna Panova & Ievgen Ovcharenko & Olena Hryhorevska, 2021. "Efficiency of using the potential of small business in ensuring sustainable economic growth," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 742-756, June.
    7. Mihailova, Irina & Svystunova, Liudmyla, 2025. "An agency perspective on organizational responses to institutions: A problematizing review of emerging market firms’ responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Berkowitz, Heloise, 2019. "An ontology of meta-organization: Variations in attributes, functions and profiles," OSF Preprints kc4a3, Center for Open Science.
    9. Thomas John Fewer & Dali Ma & Diego M. Coraiola, 2025. "Working with the “Enemy”: Supervised Space, Free Space, and Cross-Border Collaboration amid Geopolitical Rivalry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1909-1938, September.
    10. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    11. Tarabichi, Hani & Schildt, Henri & Kodeih, Farah, 2025. "Public sector innovation through nested experimental spaces: Reinventing the immigrant integration system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    12. Branzei, Oana & Parker, Simon C. & Moroz, Peter W. & Gamble, Edward, 2018. "Going pro-social: Extending the individual-venture nexus to the collective level," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 551-565.
    13. Jang-Hwan Jo & Taewoo Roh & Jongmin Hwang & Kyeong-hak Lee & Changbae Lee, 2020. "Factors and Paths Affecting Payment for Forest Ecosystem Service: Evidence from Voluntary Forest Carbon Market in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Wesley D. Sine & Arkangel M. Cordero & Ryan S. Coles, 2022. "Entrepreneurship Through a Unified Sociological Neoinstitutional Lens," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1675-1699, July.
    15. Nikolas K. Kelling & Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Gold, 2026. "Institutional Entrepreneurship and Work for Enhanced Sustainability at the Base of the Pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4014-4034, March.
    16. Abolghasem Arabiun & Niloofar Salajegheh & Zeynab Aeeni & Armin Khaleghi Forghani, 2023. "Trends and patterns in entrepreneurial action research: a bibliometric overview and research agenda," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Daniel Arenas & Marta Strumińska‐Kutra & Paolo Landoni, 2020. "Walking the tightrope and stirring things up: Exploring the institutional work of sustainable entrepreneurs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3055-3071, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04647414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.