IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04189272.html

Relever les défis par l’approche complexe de projet cas de la direction d’un pôle régional d’établissements de santé

Author

Listed:
  • Maïalen Gélizé

    (ESTIA - ESTIA - Institute of technology)

Abstract

Le projet est le principal moyen des organisations pour se transformer en relevant les défis d'un environnement incertain, évolutif et contraint. Or, malgré le foisonnement de méthodes et d'outils, un taux anormalement élevé d'échec des projets persiste. Les constats affichent des déficits liés à l'approche dite « classique » de projet, et en particulier au management de projet sous son versant social. Pour y remédier, il s'agirait de « faire avec et dans la complexité », mais comment ? Nous proposons dans cet article une approche complexe de projet sous le prisme de la Pensée Complexe selon E. Morin. Cette approche est un accompagnement-apprentissage issue d' une recherche-intervention à visée transformative qui a consisté à accompagner des directeurs d'établissement de santé chefs de projet. Les résultats de cette étude empirique nous ont permis d'élaborer des préconisations en faveur de l'amélioration de la performance organisationnelle.

Suggested Citation

  • Maïalen Gélizé, 2023. "Relever les défis par l’approche complexe de projet cas de la direction d’un pôle régional d’établissements de santé," Post-Print hal-04189272, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04189272
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04189272v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04189272v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Bertezene & David Vallat, 2021. "Du praticien réflexif au praticien complexe ?," Post-Print hal-03335180, HAL.
    2. Sylvain Lenfle & Christophe Midler, 2003. "Gestion de projet et innovation," Post-Print hal-00263271, HAL.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    4. Manon Enjolras & Christophe Schmitt & M Camargo, 2016. "La paradigme de la complexité pour aborder le lien entre innovation et exportation en PME," Post-Print hal-02537778, HAL.
    5. Eve Chiapello & Luc Boltanski, 1999. "Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme," Post-Print hal-00680085, HAL.
    6. Sandra Bertezene & David Vallat, 2021. "Du praticien réflexif au praticien complexe ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 81-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    2. Agbon, Gildas, 2024. "Who speaks through the machine? Generative AI as discourse and implications for management," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Alain Asquin & Gilles Garel & Thierry Picq, 2009. "When project-based management causes distress at work," Post-Print halshs-00688866, HAL.
    4. Alain Asquin & Gilles Garel & Thierry Picq, 2007. "Quand les individus et les collectifs sociaux sont mis en danger par le travail en projet," Post-Print halshs-00687924, HAL.
    5. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    6. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    8. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Maurizio Zollo, 1998. "Strategies or Routines ? Knowledge Codification, Path-Dependence and the Evolution of Post-Acquisition Integration Practices in the U.S. Banking Industry," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-10, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    10. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386.
    11. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    13. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    14. Bernard Billaudot, 2009. "L'ambivalence de la RSE. L'illusion de la coordination par le contrat," Post-Print halshs-00515194, HAL.
    15. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    16. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    17. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    18. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    19. Schilling, Melissa A. & Green, Elad, 2011. "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1321-1331.
    20. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Yapeng Ou & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Guglielmo Minervino, 2019. "New Public Institutional Forms and Social Innovation in Urban Governance: Insights from the “Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04189272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.