IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03783122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L es limites du traitement marchand de la Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise

Author

Listed:
  • Bertrand Valiorgue

    (Université de Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Thibault Daudigeos

Abstract

Cet article a pour objectif de mieux cerner les fondements institutionnels et organisationnels de la Responsabilité Sociale de l'Entreprise [RSE]. Nous cherchons dans un premier temps à comprendre les origines de l'appel généralisé en faveur de la RSE qui marque l'époque contemporaine. Nous distinguons un appel institutionnel symptomatique du déficit de régulation de l'ancien modèle fordiste et, plus largement, un appel sociétal, dû à une accélération du dévoilement des effets externes négatifs. Nous essayons ensuite de comprendre pourquoi les entreprises adhèrent massivement à ce projet de responsabilisation et décrivons les conditions qui autorisent l'opérationnalisation d'un tel projet. Nous dressons, pour terminer, l'inventaire des limites que nous semble poser le projet de régulation proposé par la RSE.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertrand Valiorgue & Thibault Daudigeos, 2010. "L es limites du traitement marchand de la Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise," Post-Print hal-03783122, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03783122
    DOI: 10.3917/rfse.006.0065
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03783122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03783122/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/rfse.006.0065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    2. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    3. Bodet, Catherine & Lamarche, Thomas, 2007. "La Responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme innovation institutionnelle. Une lecture régulationniste," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pursey Heugens & Nikolay Dentchev, 2007. "Taming Trojan Horses: Identifying and Mitigating Corporate Social Responsibility Risks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 151-170, October.
    2. Alexander Brink, 2010. "Enlightened Corporate Governance: Specific Investments by Employees as Legitimation for Residual Claims," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 641-651, June.
    3. Woo, Donghyup & Suresh, Nallan C., 2022. "Voluntary agreements for sustainability, resource efficiency & firm performance under the supply chain cooperation policy in South Korea," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Miguel Alzola, 2018. "Decent Work: The Moral Status of Labor in Human Resource Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 835-853, February.
    5. Mahoney, Joseph T., 2012. "Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Strategic Management," Working Papers 12-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    6. Guidi, Marco G.D. & Hillier, Joe & Tarbert, Heather, 2008. "Maximizing the firm's value to society through ethical business decisions: Incorporating ‘moral debt’ claims," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 603-619.
    7. Collison, David & Cross, Stuart & Ferguson, John & Power, David & Stevenson, Lorna, 2014. "Financialization and company law: A study of the UK Company Law Review," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 5-16.
    8. John Martin & William Petty & James Wallace, 2009. "Shareholder Value Maximization—Is There a Role for Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 21(2), pages 110-118, March.
    9. Anselm Schneider & Andreas Scherer, 2015. "Corporate Governance in a Risk Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 309-323, January.
    10. Mahoney, Joseph & Asher, Cheryl Carleton & Mahoney, James, 2004. "Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm," Working Papers 04-0116, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    11. Incheol Kim & Hong Wan & Bin Wang & Tina Yang, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4901-4926, October.
    12. P. P. M. A. R. Heugens & N. A. Dentchev, 2007. "Taming Trojan Horses: Identifying And Mitigating Corporate Social Responsibility Risks," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/434, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    13. Sorola, Matthew, 2022. "Q methodology to conduct a critical study in accounting: A Q study on accountants’ perspectives of social and environmental reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    15. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    17. Usher, Dan, 2001. "Personal goods, efficiency and the law," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 673-703, November.
    18. George Tridimas & Stanley L. Winer, 2018. "On the Definition and Nature of Fiscal Coercion," Carleton Economic Papers 18-09, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    19. Mario Jametti & Thomas von Ungern-Sternberg, 2005. "Assessing the Efficiency of an Insurance Provider—A Measurement Error Approach," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(1), pages 15-34, June.
    20. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03783122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.