IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03545595.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economics of attention: The gender-based bing communication study on depression

Author

Listed:
  • Yulin Hswen

    (UC San Francisco - University of California [San Francisco] - UC - University of California)

  • Nguemdjo Ulrich

    (AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LPED - Laboratoire Population-Environnement-Développement - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Yom-Tom Elad

    (MSR - Microsoft Research, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology [Haifa])

  • Bruno Ventelou

    (AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of personalized gender-based communication to encourage the screening of depression and seeking out mental health care consultation. An internet search engine advertisement was deployed on Bing, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns in the Provence–Alpes–Côte d'Azur (PACA) region in France during the month of May 2020, the height of the France lockdowns. A two-armed study was conducted with Arm A containing a non-personalized (control) advertisement and Arm B containing a personalized gender-based advertisement. 53,185 advertisements were shown between the two arms. Results show that receiving a personalized gender-based message increases the probability of clicking on the advertisement. However, upon clicking the advertisement, there was no significant difference in the completion of the depression questionnaire between the two groups. These results suggest that although personalized gender messaging is effective at drawing in a greater click rate, it did not increase, nor decreased, the conversion rate to monitor depression by self-assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulin Hswen & Nguemdjo Ulrich & Yom-Tom Elad & Bruno Ventelou, 2022. "Economics of attention: The gender-based bing communication study on depression," Post-Print hal-03545595, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03545595
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100993
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-03545595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-03545595/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benlian, Alexander, 2015. "Web Personalization Cues and their Differential Effects on User Assessments of Website Value," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 74450, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Lanham, Richard A., 2006. "The Economics of Attention," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226468822, September.
    3. Wessel, Michael & Thies, Ferdinand, 2015. "The Effects of Personalization on Purchase Intentions for Online News: An Experimental Study of Different Personalization Increments," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 72797, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Wessel, Michael & Thies, Ferdinand, 2015. "The Effects of Personalization on Purchase Intentions for Online News: An Experimental Study of Different Personalization Increments," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 73892, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Benlian, Alexander, 2015. "Web Personalization Cues and their Differential Effects on User Assessments of Website Value," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 73386, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cloarec, Julien, 2020. "The personalization–privacy paradox in the attention economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. José Alberto Martínez-González & Carmen D. Álvarez-Albelo, 2021. "Influence of Site Personalization and First Impression on Young Consumers’ Loyalty to Tourism Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Grigorios, Lamprinakos & Magrizos, Solon & Kostopoulos, Ioannis & Drossos, Dimitrios & Santos, David, 2022. "Overt and covert customer data collection in online personalized advertising: The role of user emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 308-320.
    4. Alnawas, Ibrahim & Al Khateeb, Amr & El Hedhli, Kamel, 2023. "The effects of app-related factors on app stickiness: The role of cognitive and emotional app relationship quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Martin Adam & Konstantin Roethke & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Gamblified digital product offerings: an experimental study of loot box menu designs," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 971-986, June.
    6. Dominick Werner & Martin Adam & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Empowering users to control ads and its effects on website stickiness," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1373-1397, September.
    7. Jia, Lin & Xue, Geng & Fu, Yuwei & Xu, Longjia, 2018. "Factors affecting consumers’ acceptance of e-commerce consumer credit service," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 103-110.
    8. Antonia Köster & Christian Matt & Thomas Hess, 2021. "Do All Roads Lead to Rome? Exploring the Relationship Between Social Referrals, Referral Propensity and Stickiness to Video-on-Demand Websites," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 349-366, August.
    9. Lama Zalloum & Hamad Alghadeer & Nawras Nusairat, 2019. "The Effect of Using Mobile Banking Services Applications on Electronic Word of Mouth: The Mediating Role of Perceived Trust," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 62-80, September.
    10. David Schneider & Johannes Klumpe & Martin Adam & Alexander Benlian, 2020. "Nudging users into digital service solutions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 863-881, December.
    11. Oliver Francis Koch & Alexander Benlian, 2017. "The effect of free sampling strategies on freemium conversion rates," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(1), pages 67-76, February.
    12. Robert G. Alexander & Stephen L. Macknik & Susana Martinez-Conde, 2022. "What the Neuroscience and Psychology of Magic Reveal about Misinformation," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Adam, Martin & Röthke, Konstantin & Benlian, Alexander, 2022. "Gamblified digital product offerings: an experimental study of loot box menu designs," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 127115, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Wenjun Cai & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu, 2021. "How Entrepreneurship Education and Social Capital Promote Nascent Entrepreneurial Behaviours: The Mediating Roles of Entrepreneurial Passion and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Johannes Klumpe & Oliver Francis Koch & Alexander Benlian, 2020. "How pull vs. push information delivery and social proof affect information disclosure in location based services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 569-586, September.
    16. Chen, Qi & Feng, Yuqiang & Liu, Luning & Tian, Xianyun, 2019. "Understanding consumers’ reactance of online personalized advertising: A new scheme of rational choice from a perspective of negative effects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 53-64.
    17. Schreiner, Timo & Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Multichannel personalization: Identifying consumer preferences for product recommendations in advertisements across different media channels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 87-99.
    18. Adam, Martin & Roethke, Konstantin & Benlian, Alexander, 2024. "Gamblified digital product offerings: an experimental study of loot box menu designs," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 144177, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. Simon P. Anderson & André de Palma, 2012. "Competition for attention in the Information (overload) Age," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(1), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Matteo Migheli & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2018. "The market of academic attention," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 113-133, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Personalized communication; Depression; Bing; COVID-19;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03545595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.