IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03059749.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In-house experts communities as a facilitator of innovation
[Des communautés d’experts internes comme facilitateur de l’innovation]

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Charue-Duboc

    (i3-CRG - Centre de recherche en gestion i3 - X - École polytechnique - Université Paris-Saclay - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Lise Gastaldi

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Emmanuel Bertin

    (Whist Lab (Orange Labs-Institut Mines-Télécom))

Abstract

This article highlights the role of internal communities of experts in supporting innovation. In the case of a technology company, it studies communities, composed of experts from different functions (R & D and downstream), has been set up by the organization to cover the fields of strategic skills related to the key challenges in terms of innovation. This article shows precisely how these communities contribute to innovation, in particular through their role of accompanying decisions at the different phases of the innovation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Charue-Duboc & Lise Gastaldi & Emmanuel Bertin, 2020. "In-house experts communities as a facilitator of innovation [Des communautés d’experts internes comme facilitateur de l’innovation]," Post-Print hal-03059749, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03059749
    DOI: 10.3166/rfg.2020.00429
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03059749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03059749/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3166/rfg.2020.00429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner Offer, 1997. "Between the gift and the market: the economy of regard," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 50(3), pages 450-476, August.
    2. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2006. "Les processus d'innovation," Post-Print hal-00830210, HAL.
    3. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 2001. "Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 198-213, April.
    4. Karine Goglio-Primard & Eddie Soulier, 2018. "Connaissances et technologie dans les communautés d’innovation," Post-Print hal-02617989, HAL.
    5. Ash Amin & Patrick Cohendet, 2004. "Architectures of knowledge : Firms, capabilities, and communities," Post-Print hal-00279605, HAL.
    6. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    7. Lusine Arzumanyan & Ulrike Mayrhofer, 2016. "L’adoption des outils numériques dans les communautés de pratique. Le cas du Groupe SEB," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(1), pages 147-162.
    8. Sebastian Raisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Gilbert Probst & Michael L. Tushman, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 685-695, August.
    9. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    10. Sylvain Lenfle, 2008. "Exploration and Project Management," Post-Print hal-00404168, HAL.
    11. Florence Charue-Duboc & Lise Gastaldi, 2017. "Le pilotage des processus d’innovation amont. Vers de nouvelles modalités de couplage entre technologies et usages," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 23-42.
    12. Florence Charue-Duboc & Christophe Midler, 2001. "Développer les projets et les compétences - Le défi des hiérarchiques dans les métiers de conception," Post-Print hal-00278114, HAL.
    13. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Cédric Dalmasso & Sebastien Gand & Frederic Garcias, 2017. "Enterprise social networks for the benefit of ambidextrous organisation? The case of a major oil company," Post-Print hal-03698884, HAL.
    3. Nabila Benmostefa, 2017. "Intergenerational sharing of knowledge in communities of practice: A theoretical framework [Le partage intergénérationnel des connaissances dans les communautés de pratique : Un cadre théorique]," Post-Print hal-01781362, HAL.
    4. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    5. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    6. Anne Kokkonen & Pauli Alin, 2015. "Practice-based learning in construction projects: a literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 513-530, July.
    7. Müller, Felix Claus & Ibert, Oliver, 2014. "(Re-)Sources of Innovation: Understanding and Comparing Innovation Dynamics through the Lens of Communities of Practice," IRS Working Papers 52, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    8. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    9. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    10. Sylvain Lenfle & Jonas Söderlund, 2019. "Large-Scale Innovative Projects as Temporary Trading Zones: Toward an Interlanguage Theory," Post-Print hal-02390158, HAL.
    11. Davide Nicolini, 2011. "Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 602-620, June.
    12. Pierre Barbaroux & Cécile Godé, 2007. "Acquiring core capabilities through organizational learning: Illustrations from the U.S. military organizations," Post-Print hal-00293534, HAL.
    13. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    14. Papadopoulos, Thanos & Stamati, Teta & Nopparuch, Pawit, 2013. "Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 133-146.
    15. Dean A. Shepherd & Marc Gruber, 2021. "The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 967-998, September.
    16. Luis M. Castro & Joao Mota, 2009. "Technological Centers as a Negotiated Context to Combine Technological Capabilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 467-482, September.
    17. Agulles, Remei & Prats, Mª Julia, 2011. "Learning in practice: What organizational and management literature can contribute to professional and occupational development," IESE Research Papers D/938, IESE Business School.
    18. Olivera Marjanovic & Greg Patmore & Nikola Balnave, 2023. "Visual Analytics: Transferring, Translating and Transforming Knowledge from Analytics Experts to Non-technical Domain Experts in Multidisciplinary Teams," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1571-1588, August.
    19. Linus Dahlander & Siobhan O'Mahony, 2011. "Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 961-979, August.
    20. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    communautés; experts; innovation; technologie; R&D; Communities; technology; Communautés; R&D Communities;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03059749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.