IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02384806.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic Supply Chain Planning and Risk Management: Experiment of a Decision Support System Gathering Business Departments Around a Common Vision

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Oger

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Matthieu Lauras

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Frederick Benaben

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Benoit Montreuil

    (Georgia Institute of Technology [Atlanta])

Abstract

Strategic supply chain planning and supply chain risk management are two fields of supply chain management that are inseparable nowadays. The ability to consider risks is essential to maintain business performance. In addition, integrating the different business departments' visions in a common business vision is necessary to properly plan the future of a company. However, it is still a challenge for companies to design and maintain a decision-making process supporting strategic supply chain decisions that integrates risk management and unify business vision across departments. This paper relates an industrial experiment as an attempt to meet this challenge. This experiment was asked by a pharmaceutical company with the aim of supporting strategic decisions regarding its network of suppliers. It led to a decision-making process including the use of a computerized information system composed of a software for computations and a business intelligence software to easily make decisions. This process was put in practice on a pilot use case with two years old data. It resulted in the identification of several decisions that could have been made if the process was in operation two years ago, which is considered as a first validation of the approach. Finally, limitations have been identified regarding the data collection, opening avenues for future research on an innovative approach combining supply chain hyperconnectivity and event-driven principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Oger & Matthieu Lauras & Frederick Benaben & Benoit Montreuil, 2019. "Strategic Supply Chain Planning and Risk Management: Experiment of a Decision Support System Gathering Business Departments Around a Common Vision," Post-Print hal-02384806, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02384806
    DOI: 10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948116
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://imt-mines-albi.hal.science/hal-02384806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://imt-mines-albi.hal.science/hal-02384806/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goetschalckx, Marc & Vidal, Carlos J. & Dogan, Koray, 2002. "Modeling and design of global logistics systems: A review of integrated strategic and tactical models and design algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    3. Raphaël Oger & Benoit Montreuil & Matthieu Lauras & Frederick Benaben, 2018. "Towards Hyperconnected Supply Chain Capability Planning: Conceptual Framework Proposal," Post-Print hal-01875900, HAL.
    4. Meixell, Mary J. & Gargeya, Vidyaranya B., 2005. "Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 531-550, November.
    5. Emma Brandon-Jones & Brian Squire & Chad W. Autry & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2014. "A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 55-73, July.
    6. Surya Prakash & Gunjan Soni & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2017. "A critical analysis of supply chain risk management content: a structured literature review," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 69-90, February.
    7. Raphaël Oger & Frederick Benaben & Matthieu Lauras & Benoit Montreuil, 2018. "Towards Decision Support Automation for Supply Chain Risk Management among Logistics Network Stakeholders," Post-Print hal-01884393, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Jordi Pereira & Mariona Vilà, 2016. "A new model for supply chain network design with integrated assembly line balancing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2653-2669, May.
    3. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    4. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wu, Pei-Ju, 2009. "A tax savings model for the emerging global manufacturing network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 534-546, December.
    5. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    6. M. Melo & S. Nickel & F. Saldanha-da-Gama, 2014. "An efficient heuristic approach for a multi-period logistics network redesign problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 80-108, April.
    7. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Holweg, Matthias & Helo, Petri, 2014. "Defining value chain architectures: Linking strategic value creation to operational supply chain design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 230-238.
    9. Sheu, Jiuh Biing & Kundu, Tanmoy, 2018. "Forecasting time-varying logistics distribution flows in the One Belt-One Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 5-22.
    10. Wang, Juite & Shu, Yun-Feng, 2007. "A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1044-1061, March.
    11. Pythagoras N. Petratos & Alessio Faccia, 2023. "Fake news, misinformation, disinformation and supply chain risks and disruptions: risk management and resilience using blockchain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 735-762, August.
    12. Demeter, Krisztina & Szász, Levente & Kő, Andrea, 2019. "A text mining based overview of inventory research in the ISIR special issues 1994–2016," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 134-146.
    13. Caitlin N. Benton & Madeline Napier & M. Ali Ülkü, 2016. "On Supply Chain Integration to Free Trade Zones: The Case of the United States of America," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 779-789, August.
    14. Naima Saeed & Kevin Cullinane & Victor Gekara & Prem Chhetri, 2021. "Reconfiguring maritime networks due to the Belt and Road Initiative: impact on bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 381-400, September.
    15. Huang, Yongxi & Chen, Yihsu, 2014. "Analysis of an imperfectly competitive cellulosic biofuel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Vernon N. Hsu & Kaijie Zhu, 2011. "Tax-Effective Supply Chain Decisions Under China's Export-Oriented Tax Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 163-179, November.
    17. Neungho Han & Juneho Um, 2024. "Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Nagesh Shukla & Senevi Kiridena, 2016. "A fuzzy rough sets-based multi-agent analytics framework for dynamic supply chain configuration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(23), pages 6984-6996, December.
    19. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Díaz-Madroñero, Manuel & Vicens, Eduardo, 2010. "Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 377-390, August.
    20. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02384806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.