IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02324267.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vers une autre conceptualisation de l'éco-conception : une analyse critique des problématisations et des pratiques des entreprises

Author

Listed:
  • Chloé Steux

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Franck Aggeri

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'éco-conception, qui consiste à intégrer l'environnement dans la conception d'un produit, constitue un levier majeur pour la transition écologique. Pourtant, le déploiement effectif de l'éco-conception au sein des organisations demeure aujourd'hui limité, celle-ci constituant encore un marché de niche. Les nombreux travaux qui cherchent à identifier les facteurs de succès de l'éco-conception semblent avoir sous-estimé certains obstacles. Dans cette communication, nous défendons la thèse que le cadrage dominant de l'éco-conception, qui repose sur deux hypothèses implicites (l'éco-conception est le produit de l'action volontaire d'entreprises isolées et elle s'appuie sur des outils et des critères de performance associés à l'analyse de cycle de vie) ne permet pas de rendre compte de l'ensemble des difficultés que rencontrent les organisations sur le terrain. En s'appuyant sur les travaux en management de l'innovation et de la conception et sur ceux du domaine de la sociologie économique, nous proposons dans un premier temps une autre conceptualisation de l'éco-conception qui nous permet ensuite d'identifier, à partir d'une enquête de terrain auprès d'experts en entreprise, les obstacles et les leviers possibles pour la conception et le déploiement de démarches d'éco-conception.

Suggested Citation

  • Chloé Steux & Franck Aggeri, 2019. "Vers une autre conceptualisation de l'éco-conception : une analyse critique des problématisations et des pratiques des entreprises," Post-Print hal-02324267, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02324267
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02324267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02324267/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2006. "Les processus d'innovation," Post-Print hal-00830210, HAL.
    2. Armand Hatchuel, 1995. "Les marchés à prescripteurs," Post-Print hal-01863931, HAL.
    3. Michael Lenox & John Ehrenfeld, 1997. "Organizing for effective environmental design," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 187-196, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lise Gastaldi, 2009. "Stratégies d'innovation et modes de management de la recherche en entreprise. La formalisation de trois idéaux-types," Post-Print halshs-00384386, HAL.
    2. Christophe Schmitt & Julien Husson, 2014. "La conception : un mécanisme de la pensée entrepreneuriale," Post-Print hal-02999878, HAL.
    3. Florence Charue-Duboc & Lise Gastaldi & Thomas Paris & Nathalie Raulet-Croset, 2015. "Couplage entre explorations des connaissances scientifiques et des valeurs d’usages : la caractérisation de nouvelles modalités à partir du cas d’une entreprise dans les technologies de la communicati," Post-Print halshs-01306684, HAL.
    4. Theo de Bruijn & Peter Groenewegen & Jesper Grolin, 1997. "Global restructuring—a place for ecology?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 173-184, September.
    5. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments. Une analyse généalogique des approches théoriques fondées sur les instruments de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(3), pages 5-37., September.
    6. Marcelo Seido Nagano & Antonio Iacono, 2019. "Knowledge Management in Eco-Innovation Practice: An Analysis of the Contribution of Eco-Innovation Tools in the Early Stages of the Product Development Process," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Diane Rodet, 2015. "Solidarity economy and its qualities: a sector s' diversity analysed using "quality devices" [L'économie solidaire et ses qualités : diversité d'un secteur analysé au regard de ses dispos," Working Papers halshs-02329772, HAL.
    8. Matthew Simon & Steve Poole & Andrew Sweatman & Steve Evans & Tracy Bhamra & Tim Mcaloone, 2000. "Environmental priorities in strategic product development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), pages 367-377, November.
    9. Noureddine Dahmani & Amine Belhadi & Khalid Benhida & Said Elfezazi & Fatima Ezahra Touriki & Yassine Azougagh, 2022. "Integrating lean design and eco-design to improve product design: From literature review to an operational framework," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 189-219, February.
    10. Lisa Melander, 2017. "Achieving Sustainable Development by Collaborating in Green Product Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1095-1109, December.
    11. Michael J. Lenox & Michael W. Toffel, 2022. "Diffusing Environmental Management Practices within the Firm: The Role of Information Provision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Jean-Pierre Bréchet, 2010. "Les 3 P d'une Project-Based View : Projet, Pérennité, Profit," Working Papers hal-00546306, HAL.
    13. Pujari, Devashish & Wright, Gillian & Peattie, Ken, 2003. "Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product development performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 657-671, August.
    14. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Devashish Pujari & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability‐Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 490-506, May.
    15. Lisa Melander, 2018. "Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 677-693, September.
    16. Kenneth Dooley, 2018. "Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 70-81, January.
    17. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Lionel Prouteau, 2009. "À la recherche de l'entrepreneur. Au-delà du modèle du choix rationnel : une figure centrale de l'action collective," Working Papers hal-00419222, HAL.
    18. Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano & Perin, Elisa, 2015. "Embeddedness and path dependence of organizational capabilities for mass customization and green management: A longitudinal case study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 253-276.
    19. Thomas Stenger, 2008. "Wine purchase decision processes on the Internet : information search or online recommendation ? [Les processus de décision d’achat de vin par Internet : entre recherche d’information et prescripti," Post-Print hal-02147017, HAL.
    20. Petrus Kautto, 2006. "New instruments – old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 377-388, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    éco-conception; éco-responsable; produit vert; dispositifs; prescripteurs; conception innovante;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02324267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.