IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02283446.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La cogestion à l'épreuve de l'Europe, le cas de la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune

Author

Listed:
  • Eve Fouilleux

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • . Association Française de Science Politique

    (AFSP - Association Française de Science Politique)

Abstract

La réforme de la politique agricole commune (PAC) a incontestablement ouvert une ère nouvelle dans la conduite des politiques publiques dans le domaine agricole. L'objet de cette communication est d'éclairer les processus institutionnels à l'œuvre au sein de l'État français pendant la négociation de la réforme entre février 1991 et mai 1992. Constatant que ce changement fondamental de politique publique s'est produit contre la volonté d'un de ses acteurs majeurs qu'est l'acteur corporatiste, on posera la question de la pertinence du modèle de la cogestion, cadre d'analyse classique et consacré de la politique agricole en France. Il semble en effet que cette grille d'analyse s'avère en grande partie inadéquate pour expliquer les événements qui intéressent ici. L'esquisse d'une reformulation d'un modèle de l'action publique dans le domaine agricole semble devoir passer par un élargissement du champ de politique publique étudié ainsi que des acteurs considérés tout d'abord, et par une connaissance plus précise des enjeux de pouvoirs à l'intérieur du secteur ensuite. D'un point de vue plus formalisé, l'objet de cette communication est d'exposer comment un système national de politique publique peut être totalement désorganisé par des enjeux d'origine externe, de décrire les formes prises par ce bouleversement, et de montrer que cette désorganisation transitoire du système peut représenter la concrétisation de sa capacité d'adaptation et d'apprentissage social, la preuve de sa capacité à "gérer" le changement.

Suggested Citation

  • Eve Fouilleux & . Association Française de Science Politique, 1996. "La cogestion à l'épreuve de l'Europe, le cas de la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune," Post-Print hal-02283446, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02283446
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02283446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02283446/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vermersch, Dominique, 1993. "L'économie agricole en question," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 29.
    2. Hervé Guyomard & Louis-Paul Mahe & Knud Munk & Terry Roe, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la réforme de la PAC : l'éclairage de l'Economie Politique et de l'Economie Publique," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 220(1), pages 175-180.
    3. David, Paul A, 1985. "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 332-337, May.
    4. Eve Fouilleux, 1995. "Réforme de la Pac, accords au Gatt : quelles incidences sur les transferts financiers entre les Douze," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 117(1), pages 129-141.
    5. Johansson,Per-Olov, 1991. "An Introduction to Modern Welfare Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521356954.
    6. D Vermersch, 1993. "L'économie agricole en question," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 29, pages 101-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eve Fouilleux & . Société Française d'Economie Rurale, 1996. "La réforme de la politique agricole commune au sein du système politico-administratif français," Post-Print hal-02403505, HAL.
    2. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    3. Marta Gancarczyk, 2010. "Model schyłku i odrodzenia klastrów," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 1-21.
    4. Narduzzo, Alessandro & Warglien, Massimo, 1996. "Learning from the Experience of Others: An Experiment on Information Contagion," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(1), pages 113-126.
    5. John S. Earle & Klara Z. Sabirianova, 2002. "How Late to Pay? Understanding Wage Arrears in Russia," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(3), pages 661-707, July.
    6. Rehák Štefan & Buček Milan & Hudec Oto, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    7. Beomjin Choi & T. S. Raghu & Ajay Vinzé & Kevin J. Dooley, 2019. "Effectiveness of standards consortia: Social network perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 405-416, April.
    8. Mahzouni, Arian, 2019. "The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 297-308.
    9. Georg Erber, 1994. "Verdoorn's or Okun's Law?: Employment and Growth Experiences in OECD Countries, 1960-1993," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 98, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Atallah, Shadi S. & Huang, Ju-Chin & Leahy, Jessica & Bennett, Karen, 2020. "Preference Heterogeneity and Neighborhood Effect in Invasive Species Control: The Case of Glossy Buckthorn in New Hampshire and Maine Forests," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304623, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. McCloskey Deirdre Nansen, 2018. "The Two Movements in Economic Thought, 1700–2000: Empty Economic Boxes Revisited," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Yunyao Li & Yanji Ma, 2022. "Research on Industrial Innovation Efficiency and the Influencing Factors of the Old Industrial Base Based on the Lock-In Effect, a Case Study of Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Wenjun Guo & Wei Zhao & Min Min, 2022. "Operation Scale, Transfer Experience, and Farmers’ Willingness toward Farmland Transfer-In: A Case Study of Rice–Crayfish Cultivating Regions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Francesco Lamperti & Giovanni Dosi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Alessandro Sapio, 2018. "And then he wasn't a she : Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Working Papers hal-03443464, HAL.
    15. Mehrdad Vahabi, 1998. "The Relevance of the Marshallian Concept of Normality in Interior and in Inertial Dynamics as Revisited by G. SHACKLE and J. KORNAI," Post-Print hal-00629181, HAL.
    16. Christian Dahl Winther, 2007. "Optimal research effort and product differentiation in network industries," Economics Working Papers 2007-19, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    17. Randall Morck & Lloyd Steier, 2005. "The Global History of Corporate Governance: An Introduction," NBER Chapters, in: A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers, pages 1-64, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Scharpf, Fritz W. & Mohr, Matthias, 1994. "Efficient self-coordination in policy networks: A simulation study," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Kevin Lansing, 2009. "Time Varying U.S. Inflation Dynamics and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 12(2), pages 304-326, April.
    20. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Battaglia, Riccardo David, 2015. "Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 162-175.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02283446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.