IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01818702.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les aménités environnementales : quelle contribution au développement des territoires ruraux ?

Author

Listed:
  • Amedee Mollard

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée = Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Christophe Boschet

    (UR ETBX - Environnement, territoires et infrastructures - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

  • Jean-Christophe Dissart

    (UPMF IUG - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - Institut d'urbanisme de Grenoble - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2)

  • Anne Marie Lacroix

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée = Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Rambonilaza Bolatiana

    (UR ETBX - Environnement, territoires et infrastructures - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

  • Dominique Vollet

    (UMR METAFORT - Mutations des activités des espaces et des formes d'organisation dans les territoires ruraux - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AgroParisTech - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

Abstract

Environmental amenities are sources of enjoyment and attractiveness for tourists and visitors of a territory whose specifity is related to quality natural resources. However, since access to these amenities is free (public goods, neither rival nor excludable), their economic enhancement is not straightforward because specific conditions have to be met. Using analyses carried out in three French regions (Aquitaine, Auvergne and Rhône-Alpes), this article shows that effective enhancement of an amenity potential for rural development purposes requires several conditions related to both site quality and stakeholder strategies. In particular, the identity of the territory must be clear and tied to valued environmental amenities and also that there be a proven link between these amenities packages and the quality of goods and services available on these territories due to the support of and proper coordination between public and private stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Amedee Mollard & Christophe Boschet & Jean-Christophe Dissart & Anne Marie Lacroix & Rambonilaza Bolatiana & Dominique Vollet, 2014. "Les aménités environnementales : quelle contribution au développement des territoires ruraux ?," Post-Print hal-01818702, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01818702
    DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.15235
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01818702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01818702/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4000/vertigo.15235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Cavailhès & Thierry Brossard & Jean-Christophe Foltête & Mohamed Hilal & Daniel Joly & François-Pierre Tourneux & Céline Tritz & Pierre Wavresky, 2009. "GIS-based hedonic pricing of landscape," Post-Print hal-02668434, HAL.
    2. Bel, François & Lacroix, Anne & Lyser, Sandrine & Rambonilaza, Tina & Turpin, Nadine, 2015. "Domestic demand for tourism in rural areas: Insights from summer stays in three French regions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 562-570.
    3. Paavola, Jouni & Adger, W. Neil, 2005. "Institutional ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 353-368, May.
    4. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64, pages 416-416.
    5. Waltert, Fabian & Schläpfer, Felix, 2010. "Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 141-152, December.
    6. Rambonilaza, Tina, 2012. "Demande de séjour touristique en espace rural et vecteurs de valorisation marchande d’aménités naturelles et patrimoniales," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 93(4).
    7. Philippe Le Goffe, 2000. "Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities," Post-Print hal-02364341, HAL.
    8. Nick Hanley & Robert Wright & Gary Koop, 2002. "Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(3), pages 449-466, July.
    9. Laura O. Taylor & V. Kerry Smith, 2000. "Environmental Amenities as a Source of Market Power," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(4), pages 550-568.
    10. Katherine Kiel & Melissa Boyle, 2001. "A Survey of House Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities," Working Papers 0111, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abildtrup, Jens & Garcia, Serge & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Stenger, Anne, 2013. "Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 67-77.
    2. Coisnon, Thomas & Oueslati, Walid & Salanié, Julien, 2014. "Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 38-49.
    3. Leung, Tin Cheuk & Tsang, Kwok Ping, 2012. "Love thy neighbor: Income distribution and housing preferences," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 322-335.
    4. Katherine Kiel, 2006. "Environmental Contamination and House Values," Working Papers 0601, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    5. Osseni, Abdel & Bareille, Francois & DUPRAZ, Pierre, 2018. "Decoupling Values Of Agricultural Externalities According To Scale: A Spatial Hedonic Approach In Brittany," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273998, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Ben Hoen & Jason Brown & Thomas Jackson & Mark Thayer & Ryan Wiser & Peter Cappers, 2015. "Spatial Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of US Wind Energy Facilities on Surrounding Property Values," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 22-51, July.
    7. Ronan Lyons, 2012. "Search costs, sorting and “property ladder†effects: Evidence from the valuation of amenities," ERSA conference papers ersa12p511, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Masha Maslianskaia-Pautrel, 2013. "Hedonic Model with Discrete Consumer Heterogeneity and Horizontal Differentiated Housing," CEEES Paper Series CE3S-03/13, European University at St. Petersburg, Department of Economics.
    9. Olivier JOALLAND & Tina RAMBONILAZA, 2017. "Assessing the impact of renewable energy infrastructure on the “tourist value” in rural landscapes: a spatial hedonic approach," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2017-10, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Celia Bilbao-Terol & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Luis Valdés & Eduardo Del Valle, 2017. "Rural Tourism Accommodation Prices by Land Use-Based Hedonic Approach: First Results from the Case Study of the Self-Catering Cottages in Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Masha Maslianskaia-Pautrel, 2012. "Hedonic model of segmentation with horizontal differentiated housing," TEPP Working Paper 2012-03, TEPP.
    12. Kathrine von Graevenitz & Toke Emil Panduro, 2015. "An Alternative to the Standard Spatial Econometric Approaches in Hedonic House Price Models," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(2), pages 386-409.
    13. Berry, Kevin & James, Alexander & Smith, Brock & Watson, Brett, 2022. "Geography, Geology, and Regional Economic Development," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    14. Christopher Coombs & Nikias Sarafoglou & William Crosby, 2012. "Property Taxation, Capitalization, and the Economic Implications of Raising Property Taxes," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 18(2), pages 151-161, May.
    15. Bianca Biagi & Maria G. Brandano & Dionysia Lambiri, 2015. "Does Tourism Affect House Prices? Evidence from Italy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 501-528, September.
    16. Yadavalli, Anita P. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2013. "The Effect of School Quality on House Prices: A Meta-Regression Analysis," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 151291, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. B. Biagi & MG. Brandano & D. Lambiri, 2012. "Does tourism affect house prices? Some evidence from Italy," Working Paper CRENoS 201227, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    18. Mollard, A. & Rambonilaza, M. & Vollet, D., 2004. "Market structure and environmental amenities in hedonic pricing of rural cottages," Working Papers 200427, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    19. Nicolai V. Kuminoff & Jaren C. Pope, 2013. "The Value of Residential Land and Structures during the Great Housing Boom and Bust," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(1), pages 1-29.
    20. Kara, Abdullah & van Oosterom, Peter & Çağdaş, Volkan & Işıkdağ, Ümit & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2020. "3 Dimensional data research for property valuation in the context of the LADM Valuation Information Model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    AQUITAINE; AUVERGNE; RHONE ALPES;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01818702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.