IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00690929.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'Imputation Des Charges Indirectes En France De 1914 Aux Annees 1950 : L'Evolution Vers La Simplicite

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Levant

    (UMR CNRS 8179 - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Henri Zimnovitch

    (PESOR - UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11)

Abstract

The allocation of common costs constitutes one of the major problems of costing, and numerous past studies have contributed to the understanding of its evolution. This article examines the approaches proposed in France between 1914 and the 1950s, and shows that each new method has sought to strike a balance between three requirements: Precision, operational ease for administrative and accounting personnel as well as intelligibility for the managers and engineers who decide on the choice of model to be used. The effects of this compromise can be determined by examining the role of the various equivalence methods devised between 1914 and the 1950s. To understand what led to the emergence of these new methods, we briefly refer to the profound ideological, political, economic and social changes of the period, highlighting their influence on the functions assigned to costing. Furthermore, the article shows not only the logical determinism of this history of allocation of common costs, but also the role played by individuals involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Levant & Henri Zimnovitch, 2012. "L'Imputation Des Charges Indirectes En France De 1914 Aux Annees 1950 : L'Evolution Vers La Simplicite," Post-Print hal-00690929, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00690929
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00690929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00690929/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    2. Yves Levant & Simon Alcouffe & Nicolas Berland, 2008. "Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations : a comparative study," Post-Print hal-01682216, HAL.
    3. Richard K. Fleischman & Trevor Boyns & Thomas N. Tyson, 2008. "The Search for Standard Costing in the United States and Britain," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(4), pages 341-376, December.
    4. Lembke B., 1918. "√ a. p," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 111(1), pages 709-712, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zelinschi Dragoş, 2009. "Genèse Et Évolutions D'Une Innovation : La Méthode Abc," Post-Print halshs-00460128, HAL.
    2. Sophie Hoozée & Falconer Mitchell, 2018. "Who Influences the Design of Management Accounting Systems? An Exploratory Study," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 374-390, September.
    3. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "La gestion sans budget ou l'alignement de la finance sur la stratégie," Post-Print hal-00650532, HAL.
    4. Sebastian D. Becker & Martin Messner & Utz Schäffer, 2020. "The Interplay of Core and Peripheral Actors in the Trajectory of an Accounting Innovation: Insights from beyond Budgeting," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2224-2256, December.
    5. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    6. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "La gestion sans budget ou l'alignement de la finance sur la stratégie," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00650532, HAL.
    7. Dorthe Windeck & Jürgen Weber & Erik Strauss, 2015. "Enrolling managers to accept the business partner: the role of boundary objects," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 617-653, August.
    8. Gibassier, Delphine, 2017. "From écobilan to LCA: The elite’s institutional work in the creation of an environmental management accounting tool," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-58.
    9. Dag Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2013. "The Role of the Management Fashion Arena in the Cross-National Diffusion of Management Concepts: The Case of the Balanced Scorecard in the Scandinavian Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Sergei Rogosin & Maryna Dubatovskaya, 2017. "Letnikov vs. Marchaud: A Survey on Two Prominent Constructions of Fractional Derivatives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. , Aisdl, 2019. "What Citizenship for What Transition?: Contradictions, Ambivalence, and Promises in Post-Socialist Citizenship Education in Vietnam," OSF Preprints jyqp5, Center for Open Science.
    12. Clarke, Matthew, 2011. "Innovative Delivery Mechanisms for Increased Aid Budgets," WIDER Working Paper Series 073, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Patrick E. Shea, 2016. "Borrowing Trouble: Sovereign Credit, Military Regimes, and Conflict," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 401-428, May.
    14. Valerio Antonelli & Raffaele D'Alessio & Roberto Rossi, 2014. "Budgetary practices in the Ministry of War and the Ministry of Munitions in Italy, 1915-1918," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2-3), pages 139-160, November.
    15. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2012. "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden," Working Paper Series 911, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    16. Roger R. Betancourt, 1969. "R. A. EASTERLIN. Population, Labor Force, and Long Swings in Economic Growth: The American Experience. Pp. xx, 298. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research (Distributed by Columbia University P," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 384(1), pages 183-192, July.
    17. Ilan Noy & Toshihiro Okubo & Eric Strobl, 2023. "The Japanese textile sector and the influenza pandemic of 1918–1920," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1192-1227, November.
    18. Singh, Nirupama & Kumari, Babita & Sharma, Shailja & Chaudhary, Surbhi & Upadhyay, Sumant & Satsangi, Vibha R. & Dass, Sahab & Shrivastav, Rohit, 2014. "Electrodeposition and sol–gel derived nanocrystalline N–ZnO thin films for photoelectrochemical splitting of water: Exploring the role of microstructure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 242-252.
    19. Rathberger Andreas, 2014. "The “Piano Virtuosos” of International Politics: Informal Diplomacy in the late nineteenth and early twentieth Century Ottoman Empire," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Chen, Ping-Chuan & Hung, Shiu-Wan, 2016. "An actor-network perspective on evaluating the R&D linking efficiency of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 303-312.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    History; costing; common costs; equivalence methods; France; Histoire; calcul des coûts; charges indirectes; méthodes d'équivalence; France.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00690929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.