IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/afr251.html

Future Research Directions on Whistleblowing in Accounting: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Meita Larasati

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia Author-2-Name: Zakiyah Sharif Author-2-Workplace-Name: Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia Author-3-Name: RamAl Jaffri Saad Author-3-Workplace-Name: Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

" Objective - This research reviews and synthesizes accounting literature on whistleblowing within the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework, with a particular focus on its extensions, and aims to provide guidelines for future research in accounting. Methodology/Technique - First, the study systematically maps the regional distribution of prior research, identifies geographic contexts explored in whistleblowing studies in accounting, and highlights opportunities for future research in underrepresented regions. Second, it classifies and analyzes the types of respondents used in existing studies, providing insights into the most frequently examined groups and suggesting potential respondent categories to advance whistleblowing research in the accounting domain. Third, it examines the methodological and contextual characteristics of the literature, including research designs, instrumentation approaches, and analytical techniques, while identifying methodological gaps and directions for future development in research design, instrument construction, and data analysis. Fourth, the review explores the empirical focus of prior studies by mapping the types of misconduct investigated and assessing the role of different whistleblowing channels, alongside recommendations for future research on underexplored misconduct types and reporting mechanisms. Finally, the study analyzes the additional constructs integrated into the TPB framework within whistleblowing research. Findings - Identifying geographic contexts that have been explored within whistleblowing studies in accounting and highlighting opportunities for future research across underrepresented regions; providing insights into the most frequently examined groups and suggesting potential respondent categories suitable for advancing whistleblowing research in the accounting domain; identifying methodological gaps and directions for future development in research design, instrument construction, and data analysis; mapping the types of misconduct investigated and assessing the role of different whistleblowing channels, alongside recommendations for future research on underexplored misconduct types and reporting mechanisms. Novelty - Offering future directions for theoretical expansion and refinement of the TPB model in accounting contexts. Collectively, this structured synthesis provides a comprehensive understanding of how TPB and its extensions have been operationalized in whistleblowing studies, laying a foundation for more nuanced theoretical and empirical advancements in future research. Type of Paper - Empirical"

Suggested Citation

  • Meita Larasati, 2026. "Future Research Directions on Whistleblowing in Accounting: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Framework," GATR Journals afr251, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
  • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr251
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2026.11.1(3)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/AFR/pdf_files/AFR-Vol-11(1)/3.Meita%20Larasati.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2026.11.1(3)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Puni & Sam Kris Hilton, 2020. "Power distance culture and whistleblowing intentions: the moderating effect of gender," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 217-234, February.
    2. Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp, 2009. "Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 545-556, April.
    3. Alleyne, Philmore & Haniffa, Roszaini & Hudaib, Mohammad, 2019. "Does group cohesion moderate auditors’ whistleblowing intentions?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 69-90.
    4. Seifert, Deborah L. & Sweeney, John T. & Joireman, Jeff & Thornton, John M., 2010. "The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 707-717, October.
    5. Sherwin Santos & Meita Larasati, 2025. "Whistleblowing Intentions of Accountants and Auditors: Evidence from the Philippines and Indonesia," Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, AG Editor (Argentina), vol. 4, pages 1325-1325.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:maj-12-2019-2515 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Shanyong Wang & Jin Fan & Dingtao Zhao & Shu Yang & Yuanguang Fu, 2016. "Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 123-143, January.
    8. Eugenia Yujin Lee & Wonsuk Ha, 2021. "Auditors’ response to corporate fraud: evidence from audit fees and auditor turnover," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 405-436, July.
    9. Shanyong Wang & Jin Fan & Dingtao Zhao & Shu Yang & Yuanguang Fu, 2016. "Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 123-143, January.
    10. Hengky Latan & Christian M. Ringle & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2018. "Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 573-588, October.
    11. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-10-2019-0163 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Oelrich & Anne Chwolka, 2024. "When deviants talk: the role of Dark Triad traits and moral reasoning in whistleblowing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 333-369, September.
    2. Horiguchi, Shinji & Haniffa, Roszaini & Hudaib, Mohammad, 2024. "Whistleblowing intentions by public accountants in a non-Western society: The case of Japanese accountants," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2021. "Social Media as a Form of Virtual Whistleblowing: Empirical Evidence for Elements of the Diamond Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 529-548, December.
    4. Waseem Yousaf & Raheel Jamil, 2020. "Does Moral Intensity Affect the Whistleblowing Intentions?," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(2), pages 84-99, December.
    5. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushik, Arun Kumar & Noravesh, Farima & Sindhwani, Rahul & Mathiyazhagan, K., 2025. "Green drives: Understanding how environmental propensity, range and technological anxiety shape electric vehicle adoption intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Sara Sousa & Elisabete Correia & Clara Viseu, 2024. "Exploring Portuguese Consumers’ Behavior Regarding Sustainable Wine: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    10. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Nadia Smaili & Paulina Arroyo, 2019. "Categorization of Whistleblowers Using the Whistleblowing Triangle," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 95-117, June.
    12. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Patrick Hartmann & Vanessa Apaolaza & Ainhize Eletxigerra & Jose M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria, 2025. "Beyond Climate Change Concern: Why Air Pollution Health Concern and Health Orientation Matter in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8020-8033, November.
    14. Hanen Khemakhem & Richard Fontaine & Nadia Smaili & Mahbub Zaman, 2023. "Whistleblowing regulations and the role of audit committees: insight from interviews," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 131-151, March.
    15. Sohaib Mustafa & Yangyan Shi & Dur e Adan & Wen Luo & Eias Al Humdan, 2026. "Role of environmental awareness & self-identification expressiveness in electric-vehicle adoption," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 861-885, April.
    16. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Yasir Ali Soomro & Hailan Yang, 2022. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    17. Long, Xingle & Chen, Yaqiong & Du, Jianguo & Oh, Keunyeob & Han, Insoo, 2017. "Environmental innovation and its impact on economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Korean-owned firms in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 131-137.
    18. Ming (Bryan) Wang & Li Zhao & Abigail L. Cochran, 2024. "Sentiments of Rural U.S. Communities on Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure: Insights from Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, June.
    19. An Khang Trinh & Mai Dong Tran & Samuel Adomako, 2025. "Environmental Knowledge and Sustainable Consumption Behavior: Evidence From Vietnam," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 577-593, November.
    20. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang & Sattar, Abdul & XinHao, Zhou, 2021. "Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.