IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gre/wpaper/2016-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A la recherche de la signification perdue du paradoxe d'Allais

Author

Listed:
  • Dorian Jullien

    (University of Nice Sophia Antipolis
    GREDEG CNRS)

Abstract

Dans "Le paradoxe d'Allais. Comment lui rendre sa signification perdue?" (Revue économique, 2014/5 - Vol. 64), Philippe Mongin propose une image contestable, parce que abusivement rassurante, de la rationalité des sujets participants aux expériences de MacCrimmon et Larsson [1979]. Nous montrons cela en restituant les données des auteurs pour l'effet de conséquence commune et l'effet de rapport commun (deux paradoxes d'Allais), que Mongin assimile bien qu'il distingue ces deux effets. Deux tendances dans les données nous conduisent à rejoindre Mongin pour conclure que ces expériences sont une source d'inspiration fructueuse pour la théorie de la décision, ce que nous illustrons brièvement par le rôle qu'elles ont joué dans l'apparition de l'utilité espérée dépendante du rang et dans le tournant interindividuel en psychologie cognitive de la décision.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorian Jullien, 2016. "A la recherche de la signification perdue du paradoxe d'Allais," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-18, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), University of Nice Sophia Antipolis.
  • Handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers/GREDEG-WP-2016-18.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Mongin, 2014. "Le paradoxe d'Allais. Comment lui rendre sa signification perdue ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 65(5), pages 743-779.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    économie expérimentale; paradoxe d'Allais; rationalité; théorie de l'utilité espérée; risque;

    JEL classification:

    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patrice Bougette). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/credcfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.