IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/frd/wpaper/dp2025-03erdp2025-03.html

Has the Beyond-GDP agenda made its way into policy discourses? Evidence from the legislative branch in Canada and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Aromí

    (Universidad Catolica Argentina / Universidad de Bunoes Aires Argentina)

  • Ann Mitchell

    (Universidad Catolica Argentina)

  • Sophie Mitra

    (Fordham University)

Abstract

Since the 1950s, GDP has been the most widely used measure of societal progress for countries around the world. Yet GDP is essentially a measure of current market production and does not capture the wellbeing of households, how growth is distributed, nor the negative effects of growth on the environment and wellbeing of future generations. An expanding literature on the Beyond-GDP agenda has proposed many alternative indicators and measurement systems. Yet, there is little quantitative evidence on whether this agenda is used in policy. This paper assesses the extent to which the Beyond-GDP agenda has made its way into legislative debates in the United States and Canada by estimating word frequency indices of Beyond-GDP keywords overall and by topic (cross-cutting, environmental, social) in the full corpus of legislative debate transcripts during 1996-2023. Keywords were selected based on a literature review and tested through validation exercises. The results show that while Beyond-GDP keywords are increasingly used in legislative debates in both countries, the frequency of usage began at a higher level and rose more in Canada than in the United States. A large language model is also used to assess whether the statements containing selected keywords are consistent with the Beyond-GDP agenda. The results based on a modified index, which incorporates these assessments, are unchanged. Overall, the findings suggest that the Beyond-GDP Agenda has not been uniformly embraced in policy across countries. The recent call for a renewed political commitment to the Beyond-GDP Agenda by the United Nations is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Aromí & Ann Mitchell & Sophie Mitra, 2025. "Has the Beyond-GDP agenda made its way into policy discourses? Evidence from the legislative branch in Canada and the United States," Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series dp2025-03er:dp2025-03, Fordham University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:frd:wpaper:dp2025-03er:dp2025-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.fordham.edu/ECONOMICS_RESEARCH/PAPERS/dp2025_03_aromimitchellmitra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Posner, Stephen M. & Costanza, Robert, 2011. "A summary of ISEW and GPI studies at multiple scales and new estimates for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and the State of Maryland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1972-1980, September.
    2. Biggeri, Mario & Bortolotti, Luca & Saccone, Donatella & Tassinari, Mattia, 2023. "Policy and political challenges for a better world: The United States and China pathways towards the 2030 Agenda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Anders Hayden & Jeffrey Wilson, 2018. "Taking the First Steps beyond GDP: Maryland’s Experience in Measuring “Genuine Progress”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Marc Fleurbaey, 2009. "Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1029-1075, December.
    5. Anders Hayden, 2021. "From Fantasy to Transformation: Steps in the Policy Use of “Beyond-GDP” Indicators," Springer Books, in: Éloi Laurent (ed.), The Well-being Transition, chapter 0, pages 119-139, Springer.
    6. Helliwell, John & Layard, Richard & Sachs, Jeffrey, 2012. "World happiness report," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 47487, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Bleys, Brent & Whitby, Alistair, 2015. "Barriers and opportunities for alternative measures of economic welfare," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 162-172.
    8. Johannes M. Luetz & Elizabeth Nichols & Karen du Plessis & Patrick D. Nunn, 2023. "Spirituality and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Word Frequency Analysis and an Agenda for Research in Pacific Island Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Peter ven de Ven & Anne Harrison & Barbara Fraumeni & Dale W. Jorgenson & Paul Schreyer, 2017. "Measuring Individual Economic Well-Being and Social Welfare within the Framework of the System of National Accounts," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63, pages 460-477, December.
    10. repec:ejw:journl:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:218-238 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. K. Shrotryia & Shashank Vikram Pratap Singh, 2020. "Measuring Progress Beyond GDP: A Theoretical Perspective," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 143-165, November.
    2. O'Mahony, Tadhg & Escardó-Serra, Paula & Dufour, Javier, 2018. "Revisiting ISEW Valuation Approaches: The Case of Spain Including the Costs of Energy Depletion and of Climate Change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 292-303.
    3. Ríos-Ocampo, Juan Pablo & Cunico, Giovanni & Gary, Michael Shayne, 2026. "Fragmentation and complexity as obstacles to the beyond GDP transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Lejla TERZIĆ, 2020. "Is there a relationship between economic welfare and innovation performance? Evidence from selected European countries," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(625), W), pages 159-168, Winter.
    5. Van der Slycken, Jonas & Bleys, Brent, 2020. "A Conceptual Exploration and Critical Inquiry into the Theoretical Foundation(s) of Economic Welfare Measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Shashank Vikram Pratap Singh & V. K. Shrotryia, 2024. "Economic Growth and Human Well-being in India: Evidence through adjusted GDP measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 987-1018, February.
    7. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    8. Angeliki N. Menegaki, 2021. "Towards a Global Energy-Sustainable Economy Nexus; Summing up Evidence from Recent Empirical Work," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Andrew Aitken & Martin Weale, 2020. "A Democratic Measure of Household Income Growth: Theory and Application to the United Kingdom," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(347), pages 589-610, July.
    10. Xincheng Zhu & Yulin Liu & Xin Fang, 2022. "Revisiting the Sustainable Economic Welfare Growth in China: Provincial Assessment Based on the ISEW," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 279-306, July.
    11. Jyrki Luukkanen & Jarmo Vehmas & Jari Kaivo-oja & Tadhg O’Mahony, 2024. "Towards a General Theory of Sustainable Development: Using a Sustainability Window Approach to Explore All Possible Scenario Paths of Economic Growth and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Rafaela Vital Caetano & António Cardoso Marques & Tiago Lopes Afonso, 2024. "Can Sustainable Development Induce Foreign Direct Investment? Analysis of the Complex Inward and Outward Flows of Investment in European Union Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9756-9783, June.
    13. Jonas Van der Slycken & Brent Bleys, 2021. "Towards ISEW and GPI 2.0, part II: Is Europe faring well with growth? Evidence from a welfare comparison in the EU-15 from 1995 to 2018," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 21/1027, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Anders Hayden & Jeffrey Wilson, 2018. "Taking the First Steps beyond GDP: Maryland’s Experience in Measuring “Genuine Progress”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Sechel, Cristina, 2021. "The share of satisfied individuals: A headcount measure of aggregate subjective well-being," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 373-394.
    16. Ji, Xi & Long, Xianling & Luo, Xuanyuan & Costanza, Robert, 2026. "A new index reveals a widening gap between growth and sustainable wellbeing in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    17. Bing Wang & Tianchi Chen, 2022. "Social Progress beyond GDP: A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of GDP and Twelve Alternative Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Rugani, Benedetto & Marvuglia, Antonino & Pulselli, Federico Maria, 2018. "Predicting Sustainable Economic Welfare – Analysis and perspectives for Luxembourg based on energy policy scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 288-303.
    19. Van der Slycken, Jonas & Bleys, Brent, 2024. "Is Europe faring well with growth? Evidence from a welfare comparison in the EU-15 (1995–2018)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Günseli BERIK, 2020. "Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 71-94, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frd:wpaper:dp2025-03er:dp2025-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fordham Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edforus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.