IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2201-d1045952.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spirituality and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Word Frequency Analysis and an Agenda for Research in Pacific Island Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes M. Luetz

    (Graduate Research School, Alphacrucis University College (AC), Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
    School of Law and Society, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
    School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Elizabeth Nichols

    (Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand)

  • Karen du Plessis

    (Christian Heritage College, Carindale, QLD 4122, Australia)

  • Patrick D. Nunn

    (School of Law and Society, Indigenous and Transcultural Research Centre, University of Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD 4556, Australia
    Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD 4556, Australia
    Australian Centre for Pacific Islands Research, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD 4556, Australia
    Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

While different in emphasis, spirituality and sustainable development are intertwined concepts that cannot be meaningfully discussed in isolation from each other. This is especially pertinent in Pacific Island countries that are characterised by both high degrees of vulnerability to climate change and high degrees of religious engagement. There is a paucity of research that examines the relationship between spirituality and sustainable development in contemporary human development discourse. To address this gap in the literature, this research employs an inductive and exploratory methodological approach to the study of major development organisations in Australia. It investigates what significance contemporary NGOs ascribe to matters of spirituality in the design and implementation of their community aid and development programming in the Pacific and beyond. To achieve its goal, the study conducts a systematic term frequency analysis in the annual reports of government-funded and independently funded NGOs, both faith-based and secular. It extends previous research by focusing expressly on the intersectionality of sustainable development and spirituality as a fertile space for interdisciplinary inquiry. The findings link development policy and practice more closely to the needs and worldviews of Pacific peoples. A better understanding of the spirituality–sustainability nexus will enable more effective, sustainable, equitable, ethical, and culturally acceptable development programming. Crucially, integrated approaches promise to make ongoing community development programmes and adaptation responses to climate-driven environmental change more effective and sustainable. Finally, it is an important aim of this study to conceptualise various opportunities for future research, thus laying the foundation for an important emergent research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes M. Luetz & Elizabeth Nichols & Karen du Plessis & Patrick D. Nunn, 2023. "Spirituality and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Word Frequency Analysis and an Agenda for Research in Pacific Island Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2201-:d:1045952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570210440568 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Vivien Beattie & Bill McInnes & Stella Fearnley, 2004. "A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 205-236, September.
    3. Annah E. Piggott-McKellar & Karen E. McNamara & Patrick D. Nunn & Seci T. Sekinini, 2019. "Moving People in a Changing Climate: Lessons from Two Case Studies in Fiji," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Juan Telleria, 2017. "Power relations? What power relations? The de-politicising conceptualisation of development of the UNDP," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 2143-2158, September.
    5. Karen E. McNamara & Rachel Clissold & Ross Westoby & Annah E. Piggott-McKellar & Roselyn Kumar & Tahlia Clarke & Frances Namoumou & Francis Areki & Eugene Joseph & Olivia Warrick & Patrick D. Nunn, 2020. "An assessment of community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 628-639, July.
    6. Everaert, Patricia & Bouten, Lies & Van Liedekerke, Luc & De Moor, Lieven & Christiaens, Johan, 2007. "Voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility by Belgian listed firms: a content analysis of annual reports," Working Papers 2007/29, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaelle Faivre & Rodger Tomlinson & Daniel Ware & Saeed Shaeri & Wade Hadwen & Andrew Buckwell & Brendan Mackey, 2022. "Effective coastal adaptation needs accurate hazard assessment: a case study in Port Resolution, Tanna Island Vanuatu," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Linsley, Philip M. & Shrives, Philip J., 2006. "Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosures in the annual reports of UK companies," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 387-404.
    3. Claudia Arena & Saverio Bozzolan & Claudia Imperatore, 2024. "Enhancing environmental reporting: A study on the role of narrative disclosure, firm‐ and country‐level incentives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3414-3428, July.
    4. Shrives, Philip J. & Brennan, Niamh M., 2015. "A typology for exploring the quality of explanations for non-compliance with UK corporate governance regulations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 85-99.
    5. Ute Merbecks, 2024. "Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) in Germany: background and first empirical evidence from DAX 30 companies in 2020," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1025-1049, October.
    6. Angus W. H. Yip & William Y. P. Yu, 2023. "The Quality of Environmental KPI Disclosure in ESG Reporting for SMEs in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Sa Nguyen Tran & Dao Thi Thieu Ha, 2025. "Green banking disclosure: A bibliometric analysis," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(1), pages 20-37.
    8. Mohammed Adel Elzahaby, 2023. "Corporate narrative disclosure practices in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 296-315, September.
    9. Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna & Torelli, Riccardo, 2020. "Credibility of Environmental Issues in Non-Financial Mandatory Disclosure: Measurement and Determinants," OSF Preprints g73w5, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mostafa Kamal Hassan, 2012. "A disclosure index to measure the extent of corporate governance reporting by UAE listed corporations," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 4-33, June.
    11. Danielle Emma Johnson & Karen Fisher & Meg Parsons, 2022. "Diversifying Indigenous Vulnerability and Adaptation: An Intersectional Reading of Māori Women’s Experiences of Health, Wellbeing, and Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-40, May.
    12. José Miguel Tirado-Beltrán & J. David Cabedo-Semper, 2020. "Risk information disclosure and its impact on analyst forecast accuracy," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 36(156), pages 314-324.
    13. Bullock Graham, 2015. "Signaling the credibility of private actors as public agents: transparency, independence, and expertise in environmental evaluations of products and companies," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 177-219, August.
    14. Eriksen, Siri & Schipper, E. Lisa F. & Scoville-Simonds, Morgan & Vincent, Katharine & Adam, Hans Nicolai & Brooks, Nick & Harding, Brian & Khatri, Dil & Lenaerts, Lutgart & Liverman, Diana & Mills-No, 2021. "Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Beck, A. Cornelia & Campbell, David & Shrives, Philip J., 2010. "Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 207-222.
    16. Collins G. Ntim, 2013. "An Integrated Corporate Governance Framework and Financial Performance in South African-Listed Corporations," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 81(3), pages 373-392, September.
    17. Hidaya Lawati & Khaled Hussainey & Roza Sagitova, 2021. "Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 557-594, August.
    18. Mohammed Mahmud Kakanda, & Basariah Salim, & Sitraselvi Chandren,, 2017. "Do board characteristics and risk management disclosure have any effect on firm performance? Empirical evidence from Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in Nigeria," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(4), pages 506-521, October.
    19. Marvin Wee & Ann Tarca & Millicent Chang, 2014. "Disclosure incentives, mandatory standards and firm communication in the IFRS adoption setting," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(2), pages 265-291, May.
    20. Mechelli, Alessandro & Cimini, Riccardo & Mazzocchetti, Francesca, 2017. "The usefulness of the business model disclosure for investors’ judgements in financial entities. A European study," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2201-:d:1045952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.