IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/othbrf/183444.html

Rice establishment methods in Myanmar: Trends, perceptions, and constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Goeb, Joseph
  • Minten, Bart
  • Synt, Nang Lun Kham
  • Aung, Zin Wai

Abstract

Key Findings: Direct-seeded rice (DSR) is widely adopted in Myanmar rice production, used by around 50 percent of farmers during the monsoon season and about 75 percent during the dry season, accounting for the majority of cultivated rice area. Rice establishment methods remained relatively stable from 2023–2025 despite political instability, market disruptions, labor shortages, and price volatility. DSR adoption is higher among larger farms and non-irrigated farms, indicating that labor and water constraints strongly influence establishment choices. Broadcasting is the dominant DSR method, particularly dry broadcasting, while row planting remains uncommon. Most farmers believe puddled-transplanted rice (PTR) produces higher yields than DSR, with an average perceived yield advantage of about 11 baskets per acre. Farmers overwhelmingly perceive PTR as more labor-intensive, while differences in fertilizer and pesticide use are viewed as relatively small or mixed. Labor shortages and water constraints are the primary reasons for adopting DSR, not perceptions of lower profitability or lower yields under PTR. Recommended Actions: Strengthen investments in irrigation and water management systems to reduce water-related constraints and enable farmers to choose establishment methods based on productivity rather than necessity. Address rural labor shortages through mechanization support, labor-saving technologies, and improved access to agricultural services. Develop and disseminate best management practices for DSR, particularly for weed control, seed establishment, and water management to improve productivity and profitability. Conduct rigorous research on the economic returns of DSR and PTR across different agro-ecological zones, farm sizes, and irrigation conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Goeb, Joseph & Minten, Bart & Synt, Nang Lun Kham & Aung, Zin Wai, 2026. "Rice establishment methods in Myanmar: Trends, perceptions, and constraints," Other briefs 131, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:183444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/183444
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sha, Wenbiao & Chen, Fengbo & Mishra, Ashok K., 2019. "Adoption of direct seeded rice, land use and enterprise income: Evidence from Chinese rice producers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 564-570.
    2. Anjali Chaudhary & V. Venkatramanan & Ajay Kumar Mishra & Sheetal Sharma, 2023. "Agronomic and Environmental Determinants of Direct Seeded Rice in South Asia," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 253-290, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Zhang & Ruifa Hu, 2022. "Adoption of Direct Seeding, Yield and Fertilizer Use in Rice Production: Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Auci, Sabrina & Pronti, Andrea, 2023. "Irrigation technology adaptation for a sustainable agriculture: A panel endogenous switching analysis on the Italian farmland productivity," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Xiaoli & Liao, Qin & Fu, Hao & Cheng, Qingyue & Chen, Zongkui & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Liangyu & Li, Na, 2023. "Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding or integrated mechanical transplanting, which will be the next step for mechanized rice production in China? —A comparison based on energy use efficiency and economic benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Nandipamu, Tony Manoj Kumar & Chaturvedi, Sumit & Nayak, Prayasi & Dhyani, V.C. & Pachauri, S.P. & Shankhdhar, S.C. & Chandra, Subhash, 2025. "Energy-use audit and data envelopment analysis based optimization of tillage and residue management in rice-wheat system of Indo-Gangetic plains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    5. Liu, Lianhua & Ouyang, Wei & Wang, Yidi & Lian, Zhongmin & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin & Chen, Jingrui & Niu, Shiwei, 2023. "Paddy water managements for diffuse nitrogen and phosphorus pollution control in China: A comprehensive review and emerging prospects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Kuroiwa, Kenichi & Chellattan Veettil, Prakashan & Gupta, Ishika, 2024. "Labor Scarcity and Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Rural India during the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343851, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Minten, Bart & van Asselt, Joanna & Aung, Zin Wai & Goeb, Joseph, 2025. "Climate risks and agricultural changes in conflict-affected Myanmar," IFPRI working papers 72, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Kumara T M, Kiran & Birthal, Pratap Singh & Meena, Dinesh Chand & Kumar, Anjani, 2024. "Economic valuation of ecosystem services of selected interventions in agriculture in India," IFPRI discussion papers 2250, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. V. Priyanka & Geetha Charan & Rohit P. Suresh & Thandava Sunkara & Manojkumar Patil & Kartik Sagar & Aashman Trivedi & K. Soumya & Subir Paul & Parashuram Hadimani & Ganesh Babu & Ravi Trivedi & Yadat, 2026. "Carbon Farming: An Expository, Inter-Disciplinary Survey," Papers 2603.20674, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    10. repec:ags:aaea22:343851 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Liting Gao & Qianhui Gao & Marcin Lorenc, 2022. "Comparison of Total Factor Productivity of Rice in China and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Amisi, Edwin O. & Li, Yinian & He, Riyin & Ding, Qishuo & Xu, Gaoming & Areru, Degaga Petros, 2024. "A hybrid variable flux irrigation model for mitigating agroecological impacts of straw incorporation and furrow ridge system in rice-wheat rotations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:183444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.