IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprwp/183098.html

Rice productivity and profitability in Myanmar: Assessment of the 2025 monsoon season

Author

Listed:
  • Aung, Zin Wai
  • Minten, Bart

Abstract

We analyzed rice productivity and profitability data for the 2025 monsoon season from the Myanmar Agriculture Performance Survey (MAPS), conducted at the beginning of 2026. The survey covered plots managed by 2,734 rice producers across all states and regions of the country. As no MAPS survey was conducted during the 2024 monsoon season, we compare performance changes with those observed in 2023. Our findings reveal the following: 1. National rice productivity, measured on farmers’ largest plots, declined by an average of 8 percent during the 2025 monsoon compared to 2023. This lower productivity was primarily driven by reduced incentives for production as shown by reduced labor inputs, with more farmers adopting broadcasting methods, as well as an increased incidence of natural shocks, notably floods and heavy rains. 2. The Delta agro-ecological zone, the country’s principal rice-producing area, experienced a 7 percent decline in rice productivity in 2025 compared to 2023, while the Coastal agro-ecological zone recorded the largest decline among all zones, with yields falling by 22 percent. This sharp reduction was partly driven by poor performance in Rakhine State, which was largely cut off from commercial input and output markets in 2025, considerably reducing the use of modern inputs in rice production. 3. Thirty-six percent of paddy farmers reported being affected by climatic or other production shocks during the 2025 monsoon season. Floods, reported by 10 percent of farmers, and heavy rains, reported by 15 percent, had significant adverse effects on yields. Among affected farmers, paddy yields declined by 34 percent and 15 percent, respectively. 4. Significant changes in rice cultivation input costs were observed between the 2023 and 2025 monsoon seasons. Prices of urea, the most important chemical fertilizer used by rice farmers, increased by 23 percent, while mechanization costs, measured through plowing costs, increased by 55 percent. Wages recorded the sharpest increases, likely reflecting escalating rural labor scarcity. Wages increased by 88 percent for men and 83 percent for women. Overall input expenditures per acre of rice cultivated increased by 63 percent. 5. Farmgate paddy prices declined by 6 percent, reflecting changes in international rice prices between the 2023 and 2025 monsoon seasons. 6. Given rising input costs and declining paddy prices, paddy farming profits declined substantially and reached their lowest level in the last six years. Nominal profits per acre fell by 40 percent between 2023 and 2025. 7. Commercially obtained inputs are significantly associated with higher rice yields. A doubling of commercial input expenditures is associated with a 34 percent increase in yields, while a doubling of chemical fertilizer use is associated with a 9 percent increase in yields, ceteris paribus. The use of organic fertilizer is also positively and significantly associated with higher yields, with users obtaining yields that are 4 percent higher on average. The outlook for paddy production in 2026 appears highly uncertain due to several factors: 1. The Iran war: High fuel prices, as well as constrained fuel availability resulting from the Iran war, are likely to complicate transportation, irrigation, and agricultural mechanization, thereby affecting preparation for the next monsoon season. Fertilizer prices have also risen sharply and are expected to remain elevated for the foreseeable future (Arita et al. 2026), with likely negative consequences for use rates and profitability for paddy production during the 2026 monsoon (USDA 2026). 2. Weather conditions: Adverse weather conditions, as observed during the 2025 monsoon, can significantly affect yields. Most climate models predict El Niño conditions during the second half of 2026. These conditions are typically associated with drier-than-average rainfall, which could lead to lower rice yields. 3. Evolution of insecurity: Insecurity is associated with reduced access to agricultural inputs and higher input costs where inputs remain available, thereby reducing profitability for farmers in these areas. 4. Labor scarcity: Labor availability is expected to remain constrained during the next monsoon season due to significant out-migration (linked to the Military Service Law). These findings point to three key implications for Myanmar’s rice sector: 1. Ensuring access to agricultural inputs: Myanmar’s rice sector is highly commercialized, and access to commercial inputs is crucial for its performance. Risks associated with the Iran war, particularly regarding fuel and chemical fertilizer availability and prices, pose serious challenges for the functioning of the sector. While some commercial inputs could potentially be partially substituted with local production factors, such as agricultural labor replacing mechanized operations or organic fertilizers substituting for chemical fertilizers, a lack of access to these commercial inputs would nevertheless have major implications for rice production and national food security. Where feasible, encouraging such substitution may help mitigate some of these impacts. 2. Expanding access to climate-resilient seeds and other climate-smart agricultural technologies: As farmers are increasingly relying on self-preserved paddy seeds, there is an urgent need for them to have access to and to promote improved, high-yielding, and stress-tolerant rice varieties. Our findings show that farmers affected by floods and droughts experience substantially lower yields than unaffected farmers. Given the expected increase in weather-related shocks associated with climate change, as well as anticipated El Niño conditions, wider adoption of adapted seed varieties as well as other climate-smart agricultural technologies will be critical. 3. Ensuring profitability in rice farming: Rice farming profitability was severely stressed in 2025. This raises concerns about production incentives for the upcoming monsoon season, particularly as input costs continue to rise while rice prices – at least internationally – remain stagnant. Adjustment of the dual exchange rate system that currently depresses output prices would be beneficial. Ensuring adequate rice availability in the country may also require expanded access to credit schemes, or targeted input voucher programs for poorer smallholders, to sustain production and national food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Aung, Zin Wai & Minten, Bart, 2026. "Rice productivity and profitability in Myanmar: Assessment of the 2025 monsoon season," IFPRI working papers 78, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:183098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/183098
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spielman, David J. & Kennedy, Adam, 2016. "Towards better metrics and policymaking for seed system development: Insights from Asia's seed industry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 111-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mastenbroek, Astrid, 2025. "Scaling seed demand through behavioral insights: Applying the COM-B model and behavioral change wheel to the maize seed sector in Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Fredrick Bagamba & Proscovia R. Ntakyo & Geoffrey Otim & David J. Spielman & Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2023. "Policy and performance in Uganda's seed sector: Opportunities and challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    3. Guo, Baishu & Jin, Gui, 2025. "Beyond the land quantity: Rethinking the role of land quality in agriculture from the efficiency perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Astrid Mastenbroek & Irma Sirutyte & Robert Sparrow, 2021. "Information Barriers to Adoption of Agricultural Technologies: Willingness to Pay for Certified Seed of an Open Pollinated Maize Variety in Northern Uganda," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 180-201, February.
    5. Galiè, Alessandra & Kramer, Berber & Spielman, David J. & Kawarazuka, Nozomi & Rietveld, Anne M. & Aju, Stellamaris, 2025. "Inclusive and gender-transformative seed systems: Concepts and applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Clapp, Jennifer & Vriezen, Rachael & Laila, Amar & Conti, Costanza & Gordon, Line & Hicks, Christina & Rao, Nitya, 2025. "Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Thijssen, Marja Helen & Subedi, Abishkar & Borman, Gareth Denis & van den Broek, Joep & Hassena, Mohammed & Addo, Rowland & Agbara, Chinedu & Otim, Geoffrey & Kyi, San & de Boef, Walter Simon, 2025. "Policies for integrated seed sector development: insights from case studies in Africa and Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Oleksandr Zakharchuk & Andrii Hutorov & Oksana Vyshnevetska & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2022. "Ukraine’s Market of Certified Seed: Current State and Prospects for the Future," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Spielman, David J. & Smale, Melinda, 2017. "Policy options to accelerate variety change among smallholder farmers in South Asia and Africa South of the Sahara," IFPRI discussion papers 1666, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets, 2021. "Technological innovation and sustainable intensification: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR," PIM flagship insights 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Spielman, David J. & Gatto, Marcel & Wossen, Tesfamicheal & McEwan, Margaret & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Maredia, Mywish K. & Hareau, Guy, 2025. "Policy and regulation in seed sector development for vegetatively propagated crops: Insights from Kenya, Nigeria, and Vietnam," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Spielman, David J. & Mugabo, Serge & Rosenbach, Gracie & Ndikumana, Sosthene & Benimana, Gilberthe & Ingabire, Chantal, 2025. "Fertilizer policy reforms in the midst of crisis: Evidence from Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Melesse, Mequanint B. & Maredia, Mywish K. & Wossen, Tesfamicheal & Odeny, Damaris & Spielman, David J. & Michelson, Hope & Waza, Showkat Ahmad & Kamunye, Kelvin & Alene, Arega & Dar, Manzoor H. & Afa, 2025. "The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia & Tran, Nhuong & Joffre, Olivier M. & Islam, Abu Hayat Md Saiful & Barman, Benoy Kumar & Ali, Shawquat & Rossignoli, Cristiano M., 2021. "Lock-ins to the dissemination of genetically improved fish seeds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Wossen, Tesfamicheal & Spielman, David J. & Alene, Arega D. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2024. "Estimating seed demand in the presence of market frictions: Evidence from an auction experiment in Nigeria," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Lei, Xinyuan & Shi, Guanming & Qiu, Huanguang & Wang, Shukun, 2025. "Who Benefits from Deregulation Reforms? Heterogeneous Impacts on Innovation by Seed Firm Size," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360608, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Khed, Vijayalaxmi & Jaleta, Moti & Krishna, Vijesh, 2021. "Seed Delivery Pathways and Farmers’ Access to Improved Wheat Varieties in Ethiopia and India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315124, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Fred Rattunde & Eva Weltzien & Mamourou Sidibé & Abdoulaye Diallo & Bocar Diallo & Kirsten vom Brocke & Baloua Nebié & Aboubacar Touré & Yalaly Traoré & Amadou Sidibé & Chiaka Diallo & Soriba Diakité , 2021. "Transforming a traditional commons-based seed system through collaborative networks of farmer seed-cooperatives and public breeding programs: the case of sorghum in Mali," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 561-578, June.
    19. Jason Donovan & Pieter Rutsaert & Ciro Domínguez & Meliza Peña, 2022. "Capacities of local maize seed enterprises in Mexico: Implications for seed systems development," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 509-529, April.
    20. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Ragasa, Catherine & Bamiwuye, Temilolu & Andam, Kwaw S. & Spielman, David J. & Edeh, Hyacinth O. & Fasoranti, Adetunji & Haile, Beliyou & Nwagboso, Chibuzo & Omoigui, Lucky O. & , 2025. "Seed certification, certified seeds use and yield outcomes in Nigeria: Insights from nationally-representative farm panel data and seed company location data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:183098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.