IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1994.html

Cash Transfers, Trust, and Inter-household Transfers: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, David
  • Kosec, Katrina

Abstract

2022 UPDATE: Institutionalized conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs may affect important as pects of pre-existing, informal safety nets such as inter-household transfers and trust among community members. We use a randomized controlled trial to test the impact of CCTs on various measures of trust and informal safety nets within communities in Tanzania. We find evidence that the introduction of a CCT program increased program beneficiaries’ trust in other community members and their perceived ability to access support from other households (e.g., childcare). Although CCTs reduced the total size of transfers to beneficiary households in the community in the short run (after 1.75 years of transfers), that reduction had disappeared 2.75 years after transfers began. Taken together, our evidence suggests that formal CCT programs do not necessarily crowd out informal safety nets in the longer term, and they may in fact boost trust and support across households. 2020 Abstract: Cash transfer programs enter communities with existing informal safety nets that function through inter-household transfers. Formal transfers may reduce inter-household transfers by reducing needs, or perceived needs, among the vulnerable households, or they may increase inter-household transfers by giving more liquidity to poor households to provide transfers in response to idiosyncratic shocks experienced by other households in the community. If inter-household transfers affect trust levels within the community, then introducing a cash transfer program could affect community trust. We use a randomized controlled trial to test the impact of cash transfers on various measures of trust and informal safety nets within communities in Tanzania. We find evidence that the introduction of a cash transfer program increased trust as well as certain types of assistance across households (e.g., childcare). Although cash transfers reduced transfers from non-beneficiary households in the community to beneficiary households in the short run (after 1.75 years of transfers), those effects had disappeared by an endline survey conducted 2.75 years after transfers began. Taken together, our evidence suggests that formal cash transfer programs do not necessarily crowd out informal safety nets, and they may in fact boost trust and support across households.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, David & Kosec, Katrina, 2022. "Cash Transfers, Trust, and Inter-household Transfers: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 1994, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140835
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuelle Auriol & Julie Lassébie & Amma Panin & Eva Raiber & Paul Seabright, 2020. "God Insures those Who Pay? Formal Insurance and Religious Offerings in Ghana," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(4), pages 1799-1848.
    2. Nikolov, Plamen & Bonci, Matthew, 2020. "Do public program benefits crowd out private transfers in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Attanasio, Orazio & Rios-Rull, Jose-Victor, 2000. "Consumption smoothing in island economies: Can public insurance reduce welfare?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1225-1258, June.
    4. Johannes Haushofer & Jeremy Shapiro, 2016. "The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: ExperimentalEvidence from Kenya," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1973-2042.
    5. Orazio Attanasio & Luca Pellerano & Sandra Polanía Reyes, 2009. "Building Trust? Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes and Social Capital," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 30(2), pages 139-177, June.
    6. Pedro Albarran & Orazio P. Attanasio, 2003. "Limited Commitment and Crowding out of Private Transfers: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 77-85, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David K Evans & Katrina Kosec, 2023. "Cash Transfers, Trust, and Inter-household Transfers: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 37(2), pages 221-234.
    2. Angelica Maddawin & Kazushi Takahashi, 2025. "Do cash transfers mitigate risks and crowd out informal insurance? Evidence from a randomized experiment in the Philippines," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 62(1), pages 77-111, June.
    3. Ongudi, Silas & Thiam, Djiby & Wagner, Natascha, 2023. "Public transfers and crowding-in and -out of private transfers: Experimental evidence from Kenya," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    4. Anderberg, Dan & Morsink, Karlijn, 2020. "The introduction of formal insurance and its effect on redistribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 22-45.
    5. Nikolov, Plamen & Bonci, Matthew, 2020. "Do public program benefits crowd out private transfers in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Lin, Wanchuan & Meng, Juanjuan & Weng, Xi, 2020. "Formal insurance and informal risk sharing dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 837-863.
    7. Selim Gulesci, 2021. "Poverty Alleviation and Interhousehold Transfers: Evidence from BRAC’s Graduation Program in Bangladesh," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(4), pages 921-949.
    8. Naomi Gershoni & Rania Gihleb & Assaf Kott & Hani Mansour & Yannay Shanan, 2025. "Adjustments to Reduced Cash Transfers: Religious Safety Nets and Children's Long-Term Outcomes," CESifo Working Paper Series 11856, CESifo.
    9. Pedro Orraca-Romano, 2015. "Does access to free health insurance crowd-out private transfers? Evidence from Mexico’s Seguro Popular," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 24(1), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Evans, David K. & Holtemeyer, Brian & Kosec, Katrina, 2019. "Cash transfers increase trust in local government," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 138-155.
    11. de Milliano, Marlous & Barrington, Clare & Angeles, Gustavo & Gbedemah, Christiana, 2021. "Crowding-out or crowding-in? Effects of LEAP 1000 unconditional cash transfer program on household and community support among women in rural Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Dan Anderberg & Karlijn Marsink, 2019. "The introduction of formal insurance and its effect on redistribution," CESifo Working Paper Series 7596, CESifo.
    13. Berg, Erlend & Blake, Michael & Morsink, Karlijn, 2022. "Risk sharing and the demand for insurance: Theory and experimental evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 236-256.
    14. Landmann, Andreas & Vollan, Björn & Henning, Karla & Frölich, Markus, 2020. "Crowding-Out or Crowding-In? Heterogeneous Effects of Insurance on Solidarity," IZA Discussion Papers 13688, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Lin, Wanchuan & Liu, Yiming & Meng, Juanjuan, 2014. "The crowding-out effect of formal insurance on informal risk sharing: An experimental study," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 184-211.
    16. Dercon, Stefan & Bold, Tessa, 2014. "Insurance companies of the poor," CEPR Discussion Papers 10278, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Nobuyuki Nakamura & Aya Suzuki, 2024. "How altruism works during a pandemic: Examining the roles of financial support and degrees of individual altruism on international remittance," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(9), pages 3929-3965, September.
    18. Orraca Romano, Pedro Paulo, . "Essays on development and labour economics for Mexico," Economics PhD Theses, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School, number 0816, December.
    19. Pierre Bachas & Paul Gertler & Sean Higgins & Enrique Seira, 2021. "How Debit Cards Enable the Poor to Save More," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(4), pages 1913-1957, August.
    20. Filippo Grisolia & Sara Dewachter & Nathalie Holvoet, 2024. "Shifting the focus? From individual to collective‐level effects of cash transfers: A systematic review of the impacts on social capital," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(7), pages 2725-2768, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.