IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedpwp/102431.html

Model Risk Under CECL: A Consumer Finance Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jose J. Canals-Cerda

Abstract

We examine the challenges of economic forecasting and model misspecification errors confronted by financial institutions implementing the novel current expected credit loss (CECL) allowance methodology and its impact on model risk and bias in CECL projections. We document the increased sensitivity to model and macroeconomic forecasting error of the CECL framework with respect to the incurred loss framework that it replaces. An empirical application illustrates how to leverage simple machine learning (ML) strategies and statistical principles in the design of a nimble and flexible CECL modeling framework. We show that, even in consumer loan portfolios with tens of millions of loans, like mortgage, auto, or credit card portfolios, one can develop, estimate, and deploy an array of models quickly and efficiently, and without a forecasting performance penalty. Drawing on more than 20 years of auto loans data and the experience from the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic, we leverage basic econometric principles to identify strategies to deal with biased model projections in times of high economic uncertainty. We advocate for a focus on resiliency and adaptability of models and model infrastructures to novel shocks and uncertain economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose J. Canals-Cerda, 2026. "Model Risk Under CECL: A Consumer Finance Perspective," Working Papers 26-09, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:102431
    DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2026.09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-papers/2026/wp26-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21799/frbp.wp.2026.09?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Scott Frame & Kristopher Gerardi & Paul S. Willen, 2015. "The failure of supervisory stress testing: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and OFHEO," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2015-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    2. Bischof, Jannis & Laux, Christian & Leuz, Christian, 2021. "Accounting for financial stability: Bank disclosure and loss recognition in the financial crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1188-1217.
    3. Robert M. Bushman & Christopher D. Williams, 2015. "Delayed Expected Loss Recognition and the Risk Profile of Banks," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(3), pages 511-553, June.
    4. Donghoon Lee & Wilbert Van der Klaauw, 2010. "An introduction to the FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel," Staff Reports 479, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    5. Lucas Mahieux & Haresh Sapra & Gaoqing Zhang, 2023. "CECL: Timely Loan Loss Provisioning and Bank Regulation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(1), pages 3-46, March.
    6. Andreas Grunewald & Jonathan A. Lanning & David C. Low & Tobias Salz, 2020. "Auto Dealer Loan Intermediation: Consumer Behavior and Competitive Effects," NBER Working Papers 28136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Beatty, Anne & Liao, Scott, 2011. "Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks' willingness to lend?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sehwa Kim & Seil Kim & Anya V. Kleymenova & Rongchen Li, 2023. "Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) Standard and Banks' Information Production," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2023-063, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Trang H. Dao & Amedeo Pugliese & Joshua Ronen, 2023. "Assessing banks’ resilience: A complementary approach to stress testing using fair values from banks’ financial statements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7-8), pages 1206-1239, July.
    3. Raffaela Casciello & Marco Maffei & David A. Ziebart, 2024. "Regulatory and contextual factors influencing earnings and capital management decisions: evidence from the European banking sector," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 87-146, July.
    4. Lucas Mahieux & Haresh Sapra & Gaoqing Zhang, 2023. "CECL: Timely Loan Loss Provisioning and Bank Regulation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(1), pages 3-46, March.
    5. Sehwa Kim, 2022. "Delays in Banks’ Loan Loss Provisioning and Economic Downturns: Evidence from the U.S. Housing Market," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(3), pages 711-754, June.
    6. Wang, Yonghai & Wang, Gaomiao, 2025. "Risk management disclosure and risk premia of commercial banks in China: evidence from global systemic importance assessment indicators," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Wheeler, P. Barrett, 2019. "Loan loss accounting and procyclical bank lending: The role of direct regulatory actions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 463-495.
    8. Joohyung Ha, 2021. "Bank accounting conservatism and bank loan quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 498-532, March.
    9. Cousin, Jean-Gabriel & Dereeper, Sébastien & Essama Zoh, Gervais, 2024. "Impact of credit risk management on provisioning expectations: Evidence from U.S. banks during the subprime crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    10. Jeffrey Ng & Walid Saffar & Janus Jian Zhang, 2020. "Policy uncertainty and loan loss provisions in the banking industry," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 726-777, June.
    11. Bandyopadhyay, Satiprasad & Jha, Ranjini & Kennedy, Duane, 2017. "The effect of the US subprime crisis on Canadian banks," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 58-74.
    12. Prateek Sharma, 2024. "Loan loss provisions and the deposit rates yield curve at US banks," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(8), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Degryse, Hans & Huylebroek, Cédric, 2023. "Fiscal support and banks’ loan loss provisions during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Laux, Christian, 2016. "The economic consequences of extending the use of fair value accounting in regulatory capital calculations: A discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 204-208.
    15. Hegde, Shantaram P. & Kozlowski, Steven E., 2021. "Discretionary loan loss provisioning and bank stock returns: The Role of economic booms and busts," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. Fan, Yaoyao & Huang, Yichu & Jiang, Yuxiang & Liu, Frank Hong, 2020. "Watch out for bailout: TARP and bank earnings management," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    17. Basu, Riddha & Roychowdhury, Sugata & Sinha, Kirti, 2025. "Real effects of lagged guidance from prudential regulators on CECL," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2).
    18. Buchetti, Bruno & Perdichizzi, Salvatore & Santoni, Alessandro, 2025. "Fast to cut, slow to restore: Bank lending responses to IFRS 9 stage migrations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    19. Mary L. Z. Ma & Victor Song, 2016. "Discretionary Loan Loss Provisions and Systemic Risk in the Banking Industry," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 89-130, June.
    20. Chen, Qi & Goldstein, Itay & Huang, Zeqiong & Vashishtha, Rahul, 2022. "Bank transparency and deposit flows," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 475-501.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G50 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:102431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beth Paul (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbphus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.