IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v67y2025ics1044028325000705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk management disclosure and risk premia of commercial banks in China: evidence from global systemic importance assessment indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yonghai
  • Wang, Gaomiao

Abstract

This study examines how risk premia change in response to the disclosure of global systemic importance assessment indicators by commercial banks. We use both market-based and firm-level rational pricing perspectives from listed Chinese commercial banks from 2007 to 2022. The study constructs measure of market and firm-specific risk premia based on the capital asset pricing model. The results show that the disclosure of assessment indicators significantly reduces both types of risk premia. Mechanism analyses reveal that disclosure lowers the market risk premium by improving the information environment and reduces the firm-specific risk premium by limiting managerial incentives for excessive risk-taking. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that banks operating under higher economic policy uncertainty or in regions with greater financial marketization exhibit a more pronounced decline in market risk premia. Similarly, banks with stronger internal controls or higher leverage ratios experience a more substantial reduction in firm-specific risk premia. These findings offer valuable evidence to support enhanced disclosure regulations for commercial banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yonghai & Wang, Gaomiao, 2025. "Risk management disclosure and risk premia of commercial banks in China: evidence from global systemic importance assessment indicators," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:67:y:2025:i:c:s1044028325000705
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325000705
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:67:y:2025:i:c:s1044028325000705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.