IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/25123.html

Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Imports from China on Employment in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Sho HANEDA
  • Hyeog Ug KWON

Abstract

Since China's accession to the WTO, the impact of increased competition from Chinese imports (the "China shock") on employment and productivity in many developed countries has become a major concern for policy makers. The share of manufacturing workers in the total number of employees has been declining, and Japan is no exception. The paper empirically examines the impact of the increase in imports from China on employment using questionnaire information of the Census of Manufactures and the Economic Census for Business Activity as well as the Trade Statistics of Japan and the National Freight Flows Survey (Logistics Census) . The main results are twofold. First, imports of intermediate products from China have a positive impact on employment at Japanese firms. Second, imports of capital products from China might have a negative effect on employment growth. Thus, reducing trade barriers in intermediate products, participating in global value chains, and supporting inter- and intra-industry labor mobility for specific workers, regions, and industries that are negatively affected by capital goods are key to employment growth in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Sho HANEDA & Hyeog Ug KWON, 2025. "Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Imports from China on Employment in Japan," Discussion papers 25123, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:25123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/25e123.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balsvik, Ragnhild & Jensen, Sissel & Salvanes, Kjell G., 2015. "Made in China, sold in Norway: Local labor market effects of an import shock," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 137-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristiina Huttunen & Jarle Møen & Kjell G. Salvanes, 2018. "Job Loss and Regional Mobility," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(2), pages 479-509.
    2. Adam Jakubik & Victor Stolzenburg, 2021. "The ‘China Shock’ revisited: insights from value added trade flows," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 67-95.
    3. Katariina Nilsson Hakkala & Yao Pan, 2024. "Export competition with China and firms' coping strategies," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(364), pages 1454-1481, October.
    4. François Bourguignon, 2017. "World changes in inequality: an overview of facts, causes, consequences and policies," BIS Working Papers 654, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Nikolaos Terzidis & Steven Brakman & Raquel Ortega-Argiles, 2019. "Labour Markets, Trade and Technological Progress. A Meta-Study," CESifo Working Paper Series 7719, CESifo.
    6. Haas, Levi & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R., 2019. "International Trade: Smarten up to talk the talk," MPRA Paper 99096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jin, Xuejun & Chen, Zhenhao & Luo, Deming, 2019. "Anti-corruption, political connections and corporate responses: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Mestieri, Martí & Basco, Sergi & Smagghue, Gabriel & Liegey, Maxime, 2020. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Trade across Occupations: A Test of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem," CEPR Discussion Papers 15186, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Erling Barth & Henning Finseraas & Anders Kjelsrud & Kalle Moene, 2023. "Hit by the Silk Road: how wage coordination in Europe mitigates the China shock," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(1), pages 32-72, January.
    10. Toshiyuki MATSUURA, 2019. "Heterogeneous Impact of Import Competition on Firm Organization: Evidence from Japanese firm-level data," Discussion papers 19086, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Anwar S Adem, 2024. "Distributional effect of import shocks on British local labour markets," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(2), pages 412-432.
    12. Luca Citino & Andrea Linarello, 2022. "The impact of Chinese import competition on Italian manufacturing," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 702-731, August.
    13. Yuan Zi, 2016. "Trade Liberalization and the Great Labor Reallocation," IHEID Working Papers 18-2016, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    14. Myeongwan Kim, 2020. "The Price Effect of Trade: Evidence of the China Shock and Canadian Consumer Prices," CSLS Research Reports 2020-02, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    15. David H. Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson, 2016. "The China Shock: Learning from Labor-Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 205-240, October.
    16. Li, Bingjing, 2018. "Export expansion, skill acquisition and industry specialization: evidence from china," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 346-361.
    17. Cloé Garnache & Elisabeth Isaksen & Maria Nareklishvili, 2025. "Labor Market Impacts of the Green Transition: Evidence from a Contraction in the Oil Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 12057, CESifo.
    18. Stephen J. Redding, 2020. "Trade and Geography," NBER Working Papers 27821, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Flora Bellone & Cilem Selin Hazir & Toshiyuki Matsuura, 2022. "Adjusting to China competition: Evidence from Japanese plant‐product‐level data," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 732-763, August.
    20. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson & Brendan Price, 2016. "Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(S1), pages 141-198.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:25123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.