IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/13066.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Make or Buy, and/or Cooperate? The Property Rights Approach to Auto Parts Procurement in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • TAKEDA Yosuke
  • UCHIDA Ichihiro

Abstract

We conducted an empirical analysis on the hypothesis on auto parts procurement in Japan, raised by Asanuma (1989; 1992). The Asanuma hypothesis of Japanese subcontractors claims that there is a new classification of auto parts and their producers according to the degree of initiative for product and process designs. The initiative results in "relation-specific skills" acquired by the suppliers in relation to the auto manufacturers in the first tier. Among the responses to the hypothesis, Milgrom and Roberts (1992) and Holmstrom and Roberts (1998) focused upon a role of the supplier association in the Japanese hierarchy system, where communication among the suppliers alleviates opportunistic misbehavior of the automakers. This paper, instead of the reputational role of the association, takes an alternative stand on the technology cooperation association, from the property rights theory, especially a general setup of Whinston (2003). Participation in the associations should be considered as non-contractible investments for the relation-specific skill. The empirical implications of some specified models concern the effects on a vertical integration likelihood of both the importance of buyers' or sellers' non-contractible investments and specificity in the acquired relation-specific skills. We estimate an equation of vertical integration wherein the determinants are dummy variables of the parent firm and the subsidiary's participation in the cooperation associations and variables representing the degree of their relation specificity. The significance and the signs of these variables suggest that, other than a model of exogenous acquisition of relation-specific skills, a model can be also applicable to the Japanese auto parts suppliers-manufacturers, where it is not the manufacturers' but instead are the suppliers' investments which create their own relation-specific skills through the association activities. The Asanuma hypothesis turns out to be alive.

Suggested Citation

  • TAKEDA Yosuke & UCHIDA Ichihiro, 2013. "Make or Buy, and/or Cooperate? The Property Rights Approach to Auto Parts Procurement in Japan," Discussion papers 13066, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:13066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/13e066.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Oliver & Moore, John, 1990. "Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(6), pages 1119-1158, December.
    2. Angrist, Joshua D, 2001. "Estimations of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 19(1), pages 2-16, January.
    3. Hart, Oliver, 1995. "Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198288817.
    4. Arthur Lewbel & Yingying Dong & Thomas Tao Yang, 2012. "Viewpoint: Comparing features of convenient estimators for binary choice models with endogenous regressors," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 809-829, August.
    5. Bengt Holmstrom & John Roberts, 1998. "The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 73-94, Fall.
    6. Angrist, Joshua D, 2001. "Estimations of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice: Reply," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 19(1), pages 27-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:13066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (KUMAGAI, Akiko). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.