IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/leqsxx/p0019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The European Heritage from a Critical Cosmopolitan Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard Delanty

Abstract

The question of the European cultural heritage and the wider historical legacy of Europe has been the subject of much discussion in recent years as is reflected in new approaches to memory and commemoration, values, and European identity. Unlike earlier histories, which generally contained a ‘grand narrative,’ new histories of Europe are now generally more cautious in their assumptions about a continuity or a narrative based on the advancement of civilization. The general trend is towards a greater recognition of rupture, which must be measured against continuity, a unity in diversity and a certain problematization of the received values of tradition. This paper looks at various models for theorizing the European heritage in the wake of the end of the Grand Narrative accounts and makes the case for a critical cosmopolitan approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard Delanty, 2010. "The European Heritage from a Critical Cosmopolitan Perspective," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 9, London School of Economics / European Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:leqsxx:p0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS/LEQSPaper19b.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tito Boeri, 2010. "Immigration to the Land of Redistribution," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 77(308), pages 651-687, October.
    2. Jones, Erik, 2009. "They have no idea… decision-making and policy change in the global financial crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53365, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Bruno S. Frey, 2009. "A New Concept of European Federalism," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 3, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    4. Chalmers, Damian, 2009. "Gauging the cumbersomeness of EU Law," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53368, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Damian Chalmers, 2009. "Gauging the Cumbersomeness of EU Law," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 2, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    6. Erik Jones, 2009. "They Have No Idea... Decision-making and Policy Change in the Global Financial Crisis," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 4, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susanne Lütz & Matthias Kranke, 2010. "The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF Lending to Central and Eastern European Countries," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 2, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    2. Susanne Lütz & Matthias Kranke, 2010. "The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF Lending to Central and Eastern European Countries," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 22, European Institute, LSE.
    3. Chika Udeaja & Claudia Trillo & Kwasi G.B. Awuah & Busisiwe C.N. Makore & D. A. Patel & Lukman E. Mansuri & Kumar N. Jha, 2020. "Urban Heritage Conservation and Rapid Urbanization: Insights from Surat, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostas A. Lavdas, 2010. "Normative Evolution in Europe: Small States and Republican Peace," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 7, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    2. Waltraud Schelkle, 2009. "Good Governance in Crisis or a Good Crisis for Governance? A Comparison of the EU and the US," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 6, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    3. William Outhwaite, 2010. "Europe at 21: Transitions and Transformations since 1989," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 8, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    4. Michael Keating, 2009. "Second Round Reform. Devolution and constitutional reform in the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    5. Richard Bellamy, 2009. "The Liberty of the Post-Moderns? Market and Civic Freedom within the EU," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 1, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    6. Bruno S. Frey, 2009. "A New Concept of European Federalism," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 3, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    7. Erik Jones, 2009. "They Have No Idea... Decision-making and Policy Change in the Global Financial Crisis," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 4, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    8. Joan Costa-i-Font, 2010. "Unveiling Vertical State Downscaling: Identity and/or the Economy?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 0, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    9. Waltraud Schelkle, 2010. "Good Governance in Crisis or a Good Crisis for Governance? A Comparison of the EU and the US," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 16, European Institute, LSE.
    10. Erik Jones, 2009. "Output Legitimacy and the Global Financial Crisis: Perceptions Matter," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1085-1105, November.
    11. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:1085-1105 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Michael Keating, 2010. "Second Round Reform. Devolution and constitutional reform in the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 15, European Institute, LSE.
    13. Kostas A. Lavdas, 2010. "Normative Evolution in Europe: Small States and Republican Peace," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 17, European Institute, LSE.
    14. William Outhwaite, 2010. "Europe at 21: Transitions and Transformations since 1989," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 18, European Institute, LSE.
    15. Gerard Delanty, 2010. "The European Heritage from a Critical Cosmopolitian Perspective," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 19, European Institute, LSE.
    16. Sachs, Dominik & Colas, Mark, 2020. "The Indirect Fiscal Benefits of Low-Skilled Immigration," CEPR Discussion Papers 15325, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Vincenzo Bove & Leandro Elia & Massimiliano Ferraresi, 2023. "Immigration, Fear of Crime, and Public Spending on Security," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 235-280.
    18. Rana Comertpay & Andreas Irmen & Anastasia Litina, 2019. "Individual attitudes towards immigration in aging populations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7565, CESifo.
    19. Alberto Alesina & Elie Murard & Hillel Rapoport, 2019. "Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution in Europe," Working Papers 2019-15, CEPII research center.
    20. Evan, Tomáš & Holý, Vladimír, 2023. "Cultural diversity and its impact on governance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    21. William Betz & Nicole Simpson, 2013. "The effects of international migration on the well-being of native populations in Europe," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:leqsxx:p0019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katjana Gattermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.