IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/eifxxx/p0018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Connecting the Dots: Case Studies and EU Implementation Research

Author

Listed:
  • Dimiter Toshkov
  • Moritz Knoll
  • Lisa Wewerka

Abstract

This paper is an accompanying text to the Compliance Database – the database of case studies of transposition, implementation, and compliance with EU law. (stract http://www.eif.oeaw.ac.at/compliance/). The database contains the results from the literature survey in a form that enables detailed overviews of individual studies as well as easy comparisons across studies. The database has been developed with the support of the Institute for European Integration Research at the Austrian Academy of Sciences and it is a free and regularly updated resource. The conclusions of this paper are based as much on the inferences that the database offers, as on the original articles and books that have been reviewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimiter Toshkov & Moritz Knoll & Lisa Wewerka, 2010. "Connecting the Dots: Case Studies and EU Implementation Research," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 0, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eifxxx:p0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eif.oeaw.ac.at/downloads/workingpapers/wp2010-10.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liliana B. Andonova & Ioana A. Tuta, 2014. "Transnational Networks and Paths to EU Environmental Compliance: Evidence from New Member States," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 775-793, July.
    2. Gerda Falkner, 2013. "The JCMS Annual Review Lecture Is the European Union Losing Its Credibility?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 13-30, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    implementation; political science;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eifxxx:p0018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gerda Falkner). General contact details of provider: http://eif.univie.ac.at .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.