IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/104072.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the problems of sequential statistical inference for Wiener processes with delayed observations

Author

Listed:
  • Gapeev, Pavel V.

Abstract

We study the sequential hypothesis testing and quickest change-point (or disorder) detection problems with linear delay penalty costs for observable Wiener processes under (constantly) delayed detection times. The method of proof consists of the reduction of the associated delayed optimal stopping problems for one-dimensional diffusion processes to the equivalent free-boundary problems and solution of the latter problems by means of the smooth-fit conditions. We derive closed-form expressions for the Bayesian risk functions and optimal stopping boundaries for the associated weighted likelihood ratio processes in the original problems of sequential analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gapeev, Pavel V., 2020. "On the problems of sequential statistical inference for Wiener processes with delayed observations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104072, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:104072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104072/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvarez, Luis H. R. & Keppo, Jussi, 2002. "The impact of delivery lags on irreversible investment under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 173-180, January.
    2. Avner Bar-Ilan & Agnès Sulem, 1995. "Explicit Solution of Inventory Problems with Delivery Lags," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 709-720, August.
    3. Bayraktar, Erhan & Egami, Masahiko, 2007. "The effects of implementation delay on decision-making under uncertainty," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 333-358, March.
    4. Bayraktar, Erhan & Dayanik, Savas & Karatzas, Ioannis, 2005. "The standard Poisson disorder problem revisited," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(9), pages 1437-1450, September.
    5. Jukka Lempa, 2012. "Optimal stopping with random exercise lag," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 273-286, June.
    6. Jerzy Baran & Agnieszka Stępień-Baran, 2013. "Sequential estimation of a location parameter and powers of a scale parameter from delayed observations," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(3), pages 263-280, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgy Sofronov & Martin Wendler & Volkmar Liebscher, 2020. "Editorial for the special issue: Change point detection," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1347-1349, August.
    2. Buonaguidi, B., 2022. "The disorder problem for diffusion processes with the ϵ-linear and expected total miss criteria," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel V. Gapeev, 2020. "On the problems of sequential statistical inference for Wiener processes with delayed observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1529-1544, August.
    2. Bruder, Benjamin & Pham, Huyên, 2009. "Impulse control problem on finite horizon with execution delay," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 1436-1469, May.
    3. Gechun Liang & Zhou Yang, 2018. "Analysis of the optimal exercise boundary of American put options with delivery lags," Papers 1805.02909, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    4. Jukka Lempa, 2020. "Some results on optimal stopping under phase-type distributed implementation delay," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(3), pages 559-583, June.
    5. Erhan Bayraktar & Masahiko Egami, 2010. "A unified treatment of dividend payment problems under fixed cost and implementation delays," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(2), pages 325-351, April.
    6. Fredrik Armerin & Han-Suck Song, 2021. "A framework for modelling cash flow lags," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Armerin, Fredrik & Song, Han-Suck, 2020. "A framework for modelling cash flow lags," Working Paper Series 20/17, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    8. Erhan Bayraktar & Masahiko Egami, 2008. "An Analysis of Monotone Follower Problems for Diffusion Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 336-350, May.
    9. Sarkar, Sudipto & Zhang, Chuanqian, 2013. "Implementation lag and the investment decision," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 136-140.
    10. Luis M. Abadie & José M. Chamorro, 2009. "Monte Carlo valuation of natural gas investments," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 10-22, January.
    11. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Erhan Bayraktar & Savas Dayanik, 2006. "Poisson Disorder Problem with Exponential Penalty for Delay," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 217-233, May.
    13. Madlener, Reinhard & Kumbaroglu, Gurkan & Ediger, Volkan S., 2005. "Modeling technology adoption as an irreversible investment under uncertainty: the case of the Turkish electricity supply industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 139-163, January.
    14. Jeon, Haejun, 2021. "Investment and financing decisions in the presence of time-to-build," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 1068-1084.
    15. Berument, M. Hakan & Dincer, N. Nergiz & Mustafaoglu, Zafer, 2012. "Effects of growth volatility on economic performance – Empirical evidence from Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 351-356.
    16. Katia Colaneri & Tiziano De Angelis, 2019. "A class of recursive optimal stopping problems with applications to stock trading," Papers 1905.02650, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    17. Delaney, Laura, 2022. "The impact of operational delay on irreversible investment under Knightian uncertainty," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Marc Fréchet & Hassen Raîs, 2015. "Les managers raisonnent-ils par options réelles ? Une étude exploratoire des déterminants," Post-Print hal-01764120, HAL.
    19. Jussi Keppo & Lones Smith & Dmitry Davydov, 2006. "Optimal Electoral Timing: Exercise Wisely and You May Live Longer," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1565, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    20. Kumbaroglu, Gürkan & Madlener, Reinhard & Demirel, Mustafa, 2008. "A real options evaluation model for the diffusion prospects of new renewable power generation technologies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1882-1908, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sequential testing problem; weighted likelihood ratio; quickest change-point (disorder); delayed optimal stopping problem; quickest change-point (disorder) detection problem; change-of-variable formula with local time on curves; free-boundary problem; (time-homogeneous) diffusion process; Springer;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:104072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.