IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/2616.html

Mapping the Geography of Products: Generative AI as a New Methodological Frontier

Author

Listed:
  • Milad Abbasiharofteh
  • Hamid Bekamiri

Abstract

This paper argues that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) represents a methodological turning point in economic geography and regional studies and provides a proof of concept for this transition. Building on successive waves of data collection methods, from surveys and standardized secondary data to web-based data, we show how GenAI can complement existing methods by approximating firms’ product portfolios from unstructured information and linking them to standardized classifications. Moving beyond product mapping, we conclude by discussing a research agenda that addresses broader data and methodological challenges and outlines how GenAI can contribute to a new methodological frontier.

Suggested Citation

  • Milad Abbasiharofteh & Hamid Bekamiri, 2026. "Mapping the Geography of Products: Generative AI as a New Methodological Frontier," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2616, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2616.pdf
    File Function: Version August 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg von Graevenitz & Stuart J. H. Graham & Amanda F. Myers, 2022. "Distance (still) hampers diffusion of innovations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 227-241, February.
    2. Mercedes Delgado & Michael E. Porter & Scott Stern, 2016. "Defining clusters of related industries," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38.
    3. C. A. Hidalgo & B. Klinger & A. -L. Barabasi & R. Hausmann, 2007. "The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations," Papers 0708.2090, arXiv.org.
    4. Jan Kinne & Janna Axenbeck, 2020. "Web mining for innovation ecosystem mapping: a framework and a large-scale pilot study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2011-2041, December.
    5. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    6. Patrizia Casadei & Enrico Vanino & Neil Lee, 2023. "Trade in creative services: relatedness and regional specialization in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1349-1366, July.
    7. Duygu Buyukyazici & Leonardo Mazzoni & Massimo Riccaboni & Francesco Serti, 2024. "Workplace skills as regional capabilities: relatedness, complexity and industrial diversification of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 469-489, March.
    8. Carolina Castaldi & Koen Frenken & Bart Los, 2015. "Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An analysis of US State-Level Patenting," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 767-781, May.
    9. Koen Frenken & Frank Van Oort & Thijs Verburg, 2007. "Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 685-697.
    10. Cortinovis, Nicola & Donnet, Joric, 2026. "3D printing and the geography of production," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Castaldi, Carolina & Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Petralia, Sergio, 2026. "European regions transitioning to green markets: the role of related capabilities and public procurement policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    12. Dominique Foray, 2018. "Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy—a case study on the emergence of new policy practices," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 817-832.
    13. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Miriam Krüger & Jan Kinne & David Lenz & Bernd Resch, 2023. "The digital layer: alternative data for regional and innovation studies," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 507-529, October.
    14. Nathan, Max & Rosso, Anna, 2015. "Mapping digital businesses with big data: Some early findings from the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1714-1733.
    15. Mariano Mastrogiorgio, 2025. "AI in innovation research: an overview of transformers," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1204-1227, November.
    16. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Joan Crespo & David L. Rigby, 2019. "Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 1252-1268, September.
    17. Lukas Kriesch & Milad Abbasiharofteh & Sebastian Losacker, 2025. "The geography of digital and green (twin) firms in Germany," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 513-516, December.
    18. Noortje Marres & Esther Weltevrede, 2013. "Scraping The Social?," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 313-335, August.
    19. Zhaoyingzi Dong & Siqi Sun & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Weiwen Zhang, 2025. "Environmental regulation promotes green technological diversification: evidence from Chinese cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2488207-248, December.
    20. Benjamin Davies & David C. Maré, 2021. "Relatedness, complexity and local growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 479-494, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeniy Kutsenko & Sabyasachi Tripathi & Kirill Tyurchev, 2023. "Does complementarity matter for the emergence of new specialization industries in the regions of Russia?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(9), pages 2126-2155, December.
    2. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kriesch, Lukas, 2024. "Not all twins are identical: the digital layer of “twin” transition market applications," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/16, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Mariane Santos Françoso & Ron Boschma & Nicholas Vonortas, 2024. "Regional diversification in Brazil: The role of relatedness and complexity," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    4. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kogler, Dieter F. & Lengyel, Balázs, 2023. "Atypical combinations of technologies in regional co-inventor networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    5. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Pinto, Alexandre, 2026. "Scientific and industrial specialisation, structural change and economic growth: Global evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    6. De Noni, Ivan & Ganzaroli, Andrea & Pilotti, Luciano, 2021. "Spawning exaptive opportunities in European regions: The missing link in the smart specialization framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    7. Koen Frenken & Frank Neffke & Alje van Dam, 2023. "Capabilities, institutions and regional economic development: a proposed synthesis," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 405-416.
    8. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Broekel, Tom & Diodato, Dario & Giuliani, Elisa & Hausmann, Ricardo & O'Clery, Neave & Rigby, David, 2022. "Reprint of The new paradigm of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    9. Barbero, Javier & Diukanova, Olga & Gianelle, Carlo & Salotti, Simone & Santoalha, Artur, 2024. "Technologically related diversification: One size does not fit all European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    10. Mert Abay & Sedef Akgüngör, 2024. "Technological paths and smart specialization: analysis of regional entry and exit in Turkey," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 45-84, March.
    11. Seung Hwan Kim & Bogang Jun & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2023. "Technological relatedness: how do firms diversify their technology?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 4901-4931, September.
    12. Ron Boschma & Ernest Miguelez & Rosina Moreno & Diego B. Ocampo-Corrales, 2021. "Technological breakthroughs in European regions: the role of related and unrelated combinations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2118, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2021.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:2gw9c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tom Broekel & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Silje Haus-Reve, 2021. "The roles of diversity, complexity, and relatedness in regional development – What does the occupational perspective add?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2135, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2021.
    15. DIODATO Dario, 2024. "Handbook of Economic Complexity for Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC138666, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Colozza, Federico & Boschma, Ron & Morrison, Andrea & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2021. "The importance of global value chains and regional capabilities for the economic complexity of EU-regions," MERIT Working Papers 2021-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. R. Boschma & Eduardo Hernández-Rodríguez & A. Morrison & C. Pietrobelli, 2021. "Do global value chains and local capabilities matter for economic complexity in EU regions?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2139, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2021.
    18. Leonardo Mazzoni & Niccolò Innocenti, 2024. "What conditions favor high-potential entrepreneurship? Unpacking the nexus between the industrial structure and startup typologies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1201-1222, March.
    19. Jing Chen & Xiaojing Li & Xiaoqi Zhou & Rongjun Ao, 2025. "Skill capabilities behind the scenes. The role of occupational portfolio in regional industrial evolution," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2508, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2025.
    20. Fritz, Benedikt & Manduca, Robert, 2021. "The Economic Complexity of US Metropolitan Areas," SocArXiv 2gw9c, Center for Open Science.
    21. Seung Hwan Kim & Jeong hwan Jeon & Anwar Aridi & Bogang Jun, 2022. "Factors that affect the technological transition of firms toward the industry 4.0 technologies," Papers 2209.02239, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deguunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.