IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/2610.html

Structural Inertia in Regional Industrial Concentration: Persistence and Mobility across European Regions, 2017–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Rudy Fernandez-Escobedo

Abstract

Regional industrial structures are shaped by path dependence and resist rapid change, yet fine-grained evidence on their dynamics through major shocks remains scarce. This paper analyses the persistence and mobility of industrial concentration across 1,320 NUTS3 regions in the EU-27 and UK over 2017–2023, a window bracketing the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a purpose-built firm-level panel of approximately 2.04 million firms drawn from Orbis, aggregated to NACE4 × NUTS3 resolution, the analysis combines Herfindahl-Hirschman concentration indices, Theil inequality decomposition, and Markov transition matrices to characterise structural change at a granularity not previously available. Three findings emerge. First, industrial concentration is highly persistent: approximately half of all regions retained their relative concentration quintile across the period, and rank ordering was strongly preserved even through the pandemic shock, confirming the core prediction of evolutionary economic geography. Second, change operated through distributional compression rather than rank disruption, with mean reversion concentrated at the extremes of the distribution while the relative ordering of regions held. Third, structural mobility is systematically patterned by regional typology: capital metropolitan regions diversified faster than their national context, while island regions moved toward greater concentration. The island result reveals a structural concentration trap with direct implications for Smart Specialisation policy, since the regions least able to diversify are precisely those for which place-based innovation strategy is documented to be weakest. The paper introduces a coverage filter benchmarked against Eurostat Labour Force Survey data, separating genuine structural change from database artefacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudy Fernandez-Escobedo, 2026. "Structural Inertia in Regional Industrial Concentration: Persistence and Mobility across European Regions, 2017–2023," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2610, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2610.pdf
    File Function: Version June 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa De Propris & Sandrine Labory, 2025. "An industrial strategy for EU cohesion in an era of transformation," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2-3), pages 249-271, May.
    2. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2011. "The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 295-307, March.
    3. Karl Aiginger & Stephen W. Davies, 2004. "Industrial specialisation and geographic concentration: Two sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 7, pages 231-248, November.
    4. Rinaldo Evangelista & Valentina Meliciani & Antonio Vezzani, 2018. "Specialisation in key enabling technologies and regional growth in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 273-289, April.
    5. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    6. Ariel L. Wirkierman & Tommaso Ciarli & Maria Savona, 2025. "Employment imbalances in EU regions: technological dependence or high-tech trade centrality?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2392794-239, December.
    7. Roberto Antonietti & Sandro Montresor, 2021. "Going beyond Relatedness: Regional Diversification Trajectories and Key Enabling Technologies (KETs) in Italian Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 97(2), pages 187-207, March.
    8. Simona Iammarino & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 273-298.
    9. Francesco Foglia, 2025. "The impact of EU Cohesion policy funds for Smart Specialisation in a lagging region: evidence from RDD approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(3), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Karl Aiginger & Stephen W. Davies, 2004. "Industrial Specialisation and Geographic Concentration: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Not for the European Union," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 231-248, November.
    11. Francesco Molica, 2025. "Reassessing Cohesion Policy Through the Lens of the New EU Industrial Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 302-319, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziming Gao, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Shadow of Technology: Robotics Development and Regional Economic Inequality," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2249-2282, March.
    2. Colin Wessendorf & Alexander Kopka & Dirk Fornahl, 2021. "The impact of the six European Key Enabling Technologies (KETs) on regional knowledge creation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2127, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    3. Eleonora Cutrini, 2005. "The Balassa Index meets the Theil Index - a Decomposition Methodology for Location Studies," ERSA conference papers ersa05p123, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Haiqian Ke & Wenyi Yang & Xiaoyang Liu & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Cutrini, Eleonora, 2009. "Using entropy measures to disentangle regional from national localization patterns," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 243-250, March.
    6. Maria Tsiapa, 2014. "Industrial Concentration Patterns of the European Union," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 5-33.
    7. D'artis Kancs, 2007. "Does Economic Integration Affect the Structure of Industries? Empirical Evidence from the CEE," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 73-97.
    8. Nicole Palan, 2010. "Measurement of Specialization – The Choice of Indices," FIW Working Paper series 062, FIW.
    9. Farid MAKHLOUF & Natalia VECHIU, 2010. "Economic Integration and Productive Specialization in the EU27: does FDI influence Countries’ Specialization?," Working Papers 2010-2011_6, CATT - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, revised Nov 2010.
    10. Aleksandra Parteka, 2010. "Employment and export specialisation along the development path: some robust evidence," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 615-640, January.
    11. Wei Zhang & Canfei He, 2024. "Perilous Evolutionary Paths of Industrial Policy in a Developmental Context: Evidence from the Chinese Medical Industry," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(3), pages 384-401, July.
    12. Sébastien Bourdin & Arsène Perrot, 2025. "Breaking free from the regional carbon trap: analysing the persistence of CO 2 emissions in EU regions," Post-Print hal-05376844, HAL.
    13. Mattia Balestra & Giulio Cainelli & Roberto Ganau & Nadiia Matsiuk & Mario Pasquato & Roberto Pierdicca, 2025. "Sovereignty, Civic Capital, and Local Development. A Historical Perspective in Economic Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2504, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2025.
    14. Olga Alonso-Villar & Coral Del R O, 2025. "From the Extent of Segregation to its Consequences in Terms of Wellbeing," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 254(3), pages 5-43, September.
    15. Frattini, Federico Fabio & Vona, Francesco & Bontadini, Filippo & Colantone, Italo, "undated". "The Local Job Multipliers of Green Industrialization," FEEM Working Papers 358792, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Bickenbach, Frank & Bode, Eckhardt & Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2010. "Structural cohesion in Europe: Stylized facts," Kiel Working Papers 1669, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    17. Marie-Line Duboz & Rachel Guillain & Julie Le Gallo, 2009. "Les schémas de concentration sectorielle au sein de l’Union européenne : l’Est miroir de l’Ouest ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 423(1), pages 59-76.
    18. Nicola Cortinovis & Riccardo Crescenzi & Frank van Oort, 2020. "Multinational enterprises, industrial relatedness and employment in European regions [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1165-1205.
    19. Jiří Dvořáček, 2007. "Development of Manufacturing and its Enterprises on Beginning of the 21st century [Vývoj zpracovatelského průmyslu a průmyslových podniků na počátku 21. století]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(2), pages 6-16.
    20. Gianluca Cafiso, 2011. "Sectoral border effects and the geographic concentration of production," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 147(3), pages 543-566, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • L16 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deguunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.