IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/een/ccepwp/2301.html

Phasing out coal power in a developing country context: Insights from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thang Nam Do

    (Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University)

  • Paul J. Burke

    (Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University)

Abstract

At the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 26th Conference of the Parties (COP 26) in November 2021, Vietnam pledged to phase out unabated coal power by the 2040s or as soon as possible thereafter. Achieving this will require major efforts. This study investigates the drivers for Vietnam s coal power phase-out decision, barriers to Vietnam achieving a successful unabated thermal coal phase out, and potential strategies to achieve the pledge. To this end, a survey of 43 experts from government agencies, research institutions, civil society, and industry was carried out, supplemented by 23 follow-up interviews. The results indicate that ambition to attract international support for green growth initiatives in a context of limited financing options for new coal power projects appears to have been the primary driver for the decision. Key barriers include concerns about electricity shortages and incomplete regulatory frameworks for new clean power options. Recommended strategies include: 1) reforming regulations to facilitate investments in clean energy, electricity transmission, and energy storage; 2) continuing political prioritisation; and 3) building broad-based support from the community and enterprises. Vietnam s case is relevant to other developing countries and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Thang Nam Do & Paul J. Burke, 2023. "Phasing out coal power in a developing country context: Insights from Vietnam," CCEP Working Papers 2301, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:een:ccepwp:2301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/fd5df4bc-f95b-4c60-baff-c490a7074aa6/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuri Anatolyevich Plakitkin & Andrea Tick & Liudmila Semenovna Plakitkina & Konstantin Igorevich Dyachenko, 2025. "Global Energy Trajectories: Innovation-Driven Pathways to Future Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-37, August.
    2. Nedopil, Christoph & Ang, Lawrence & Carpio, Matt & Yue, Mengdi, 2024. "Can investors benefit from the early retirement of coal plants: A plant-level analysis of Chinese-sponsored coal stations in Vietnam and Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Minh Ha-Duong, 2024. "Vietnam at the dawn of its energy transition," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 115-136.
    4. An, Haolun & Wu, Shimei & Chu, Ruoyu & Qu, Yanyang & Zhu, Xiandong & Zhang, Bohao, 2025. "Tracing thermal power emissions footprint in a global value chains perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    5. Shangram Bahadur Shah & Jirakiattikul Sopin & Kua-Anan Techato & Bibek Kumar Mudbhari, 2023. "A Systematic Review on Nexus Between Green Finance and Climate Change: Evidence from China and India," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 599-613, July.
    6. Thang Nam Do, 2024. "Insider perspectives on Southeast Asiaʼs clean energy transition," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), May.
    7. Moon, Sungho & Lee, Jongsu & Kim, Junghun & Choi, Hyunhong, 2025. "Analysis on the acceptance of coal phase-out policy considering public preferences: Policy implications and future direction based on empirical evidence from South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Chu, Long & Do, Thang Nam & Le, Thi Ha Lien & Ho, Quoc Anh & Dang, Khoi, 2024. "Carbon border adjustment mechanism, carbon pricing, and within-sector shifts: A partial equilibrium approach to Vietnam's steel sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Minh Ha-Duong, 2023. "Vietnam’s Just Energy Transition Partnership: a background report," CIRED Working Papers hal-04094268, HAL.
    10. Inessa Sytnik & Artem Stopochkin, 2023. "Methodology for Assessing the Level of Electricity Self-Sufficiency in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Wang, Delu & Mao, Jinqi & Shi, Xunpeng & Li, Chunxiao & Chen, Fan, 2024. "A planning model for coal power exit scales based on minimizing idle and shortage losses: A case study of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2024. "The Role of Financial Markets in Energy Transitions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Bao, Bingpeng & Fu, Dahai & Yu, Jian & Zhang, Ying, 2024. "Lights dim, exports down: Examining the trade effects of power shortages on Chinese manufacturing firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Subin Antony Jose & Joy Calhoun & Otoniel B. Renteria & Pedro Mercado & Shinichiro Nakajima & Colton N. Hope & Mario Sotelo & Pradeep L. Menezes, 2024. "Promoting a Circular Economy in Mining Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-34, December.
    15. Dhandhania, Kopal & Unni, Jeemol & Pathak, Minal, 2025. "Recognizing historic injustice in a coal-rich district: A case study of Singrauli, India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Bertha Othoche, 2024. "An Assessment of the Strategies for Energy Transition in Kenya as a Climate Change Mitigation Strategy," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(15), pages 196-205, November.
    17. Wang, Guanghao & Wan, Hongtao & Sbai, Erwann, 2025. "Nonlinear impacts of distributed generation on extreme electricity prices under policy shocks: Evidence from New Zealand's oil and gas exploration ban," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:ccepwp:2301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCEP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.