Author
Listed:
- Wang, Guanghao
- Wan, Hongtao
- Sbai, Erwann
Abstract
This study investigates the asymmetric impact of Distributed Generation (DG) penetration on extreme wholesale electricity price movements in New Zealand, using the 2018 oil and gas exploration ban as a structural policy shock. By integrating benchmark fixed effects and System-GMM estimations with a Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lag (QARDL) model, we explore how DG influences both lower-tail (ED) and upper-tail (EI) price volatility before and after the ban. Empirical results reveal that prior to the ban, higher DG penetration was significantly associated with a reduction in EI and a modest elevation in ED in the short run, helping stabilize the system by smoothing marginal price risks. However, in the long run, oversupply effects—particularly from solar—led to a rise in the frequency of ED events, suggesting unintended downward pressure during low-demand periods. After the ban, DG's regulatory role shifted: in the ED regime, DG deepened low-price suppression and volatility, while in the EI regime, it failed to mitigate upward price pressures due to fossil fuel constraints and reduced system flexibility. The system stability coefficient ρ from the QARDL-ECM specification indicates slower price mean-reversion post-ban, highlighting increased market fragility. These findings suggest that DG's effect on market stability is not static but highly state-dependent and shaped by policy context. While DG can contribute to long-term price smoothing, its short-term stabilizing capacity weakens under supply shocks and institutional constraints. To enhance system resilience, policymakers must complement DG expansion with investment in energy storage, demand-side flexibility, and diversified generation sources. Without these, DG alone may amplify rather than mitigate extreme price risks under transition pressures.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Guanghao & Wan, Hongtao & Sbai, Erwann, 2025.
"Nonlinear impacts of distributed generation on extreme electricity prices under policy shocks: Evidence from New Zealand's oil and gas exploration ban,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225033961
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137754
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225033961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.