IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dpr/wpaper/1307.html

Inattention to market shrinkage: The case of the photo film market

Author

Listed:
  • Masataka Eguchi
  • Takayuki Tsuruga
  • Mai Yamada

Abstract

In the photo film market of the 2000s, Kodak's failure to sufficiently reduce production in response to market shrinkage has become a canonical example of how firms fail to adjust to market shrinkage. This seemingly optimistic response contrasts sharply with Fujifilm's response, which ultimately led it to exit the market successfully. To account for these contrasting cases, we incorporate the sparsity-based model of \citet{gabaix2014sparsity} into a textbook Cournot model in which firms are inattentive to changes in market size. We show that such inattention leads firms to respond optimistically to market shrinkage relative to the full-attention benchmark. We also show that a firm may respond pessimistically when its competitor is substantially inattentive. These results help explain Kodak's slow response and Fujifilm's relatively rapid adjustment to market shrinkage. Finally, we develop a model with endogenous attention choice, in which heterogeneity in forecast horizons and/or production cost structures generates heterogeneity in attention, a key driver of our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Masataka Eguchi & Takayuki Tsuruga & Mai Yamada, 2026. "Inattention to market shrinkage: The case of the photo film market," ISER Discussion Paper 1307, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
  • Handle: RePEc:dpr:wpaper:1307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/static/resources/docs/dp/DP1307.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Tripsas & Giovanni Gavetti, 2000. "Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1147-1161, October.
    2. Bartosz Mackowiak & Mirko Wiederholt, 2009. "Optimal Sticky Prices under Rational Inattention," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 769-803, June.
    3. Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2016. "Competition for Attention," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(2), pages 481-513.
    4. Doruk Cetemen & Chiara Margaria, 2024. "Exit Dilemma: The Role of Private Learning on Firm Survival," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 110-154, February.
    5. Janssen, Aljoscha & Kasinger, Johannes, 2024. "Obfuscation and rational inattention," Other publications TiSEM b1b654a7-c163-4f68-9eb5-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Xavier Gabaix & David Laibson, 2018. "Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia and information suppression in competitive markets," Chapters, in: Victor J. Tremblay & Elizabeth Schroeder & Carol Horton Tremblay (ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization, chapter 3, pages 40-74, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Wilson, Chris M., 2010. "Ordered search and equilibrium obfuscation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 496-506, September.
    8. Aljoscha Janssen & Johannes Kasinger, 2024. "Obfuscation and Rational Inattention," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 390-428, March.
    9. Sims, Christopher A., 2003. "Implications of rational inattention," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 665-690, April.
    10. Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 226-273, March.
    11. Pan Lijun, 2024. "Strategic Partial Inattention in Oligopoly," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 24(2), pages 729-740.
    12. Ran Spiegler, 2016. "Choice Complexity and Market Competition," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Xavier Gabaix, 2014. "A Sparsity-Based Model of Bounded Rationality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(4), pages 1661-1710.
    14. Hassan Afrouzi, 2024. "Strategic Inattention, Inflation Dynamics, and the Nonneutrality of Money," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(10), pages 3378-3420.
    15. Jonathan C. Ho & Hongyi Chen, 2018. "Managing the Disruptive and Sustaining the Disrupted: The Case of Kodak and Fujifilm in the Face of Digital Disruption," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(3), pages 352-371, May.
    16. Xavier Vives, 2002. "Private Information, Strategic Behavior, and Efficiency in Cournot Markets," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(3), pages 361-376, Autumn.
    17. Carlo M. Cusumano & Francesco Fabbri & Ferdinand Pieroth, 2024. "Competing to Commit: Markets with Rational Inattention," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(1), pages 285-306, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xavier Gabaix, 2017. "Behavioral Inattention," NBER Working Papers 24096, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ambre Nicolle & Christos Genakos & Tobias Kretschmer, 2025. "Strategic confusopoly: evidence from the UK mobile telecommunications market," Working Papers 202503, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Janssen, Aljoscha & Kasinger, Johannes, 2021. "Obfuscation and rational inattention in digitalized markets," SAFE Working Paper Series 306, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    4. Michael Grubb, 2015. "Failing to Choose the Best Price: Theory, Evidence, and Policy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 303-340, November.
    5. Alexandros Botsis & Christoph Görtz & Plutarchos Sakellaris, 2020. "Quantifying Qualitative Survey Data: New Insights on the (Ir)Rationality of Firms' Forecasts," CESifo Working Paper Series 8148, CESifo.
    6. Chua, Chew Lian & Tsiaplias, Sarantis, 2024. "The influence of supermarket prices on consumer inflation expectations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 414-433.
    7. Janssen, Aljoscha & Kasinger, Johannes, 2021. "Obfuscation and Rational Inattention in Digitalized Markets," Working Paper Series 1379, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    8. Kohlhas, Alexandre N. & Robertson, Donald, 2025. "Cautious expectations," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(S).
    9. Roc Armenter & Michèle Müller‐Itten & Zachary R. Stangebye, 2024. "Geometric methods for finite rational inattention," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(1), pages 115-144, January.
    10. Sergey Turlo & Matteo Fina & Johannes Kasinger & Arash Laghaie & Thomas Otter, 2025. "Discrete choice in marketing through the lens of rational inattention," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 45-104, March.
    11. George Loewenstein & Zachary Wojtowicz, 2023. "The Economics of Attention," CESifo Working Paper Series 10712, CESifo.
    12. Persson, Petra, 2018. "Attention manipulation and information overload," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 78-106, May.
    13. Atahan Afsar; José Elías Gallegos; Richard Jaimes; Edgar Silgado Gómez & Jos� El�as Gallegos & Richard Jaimes & Edgar Silgado G�mez, 2020. "Reconciling Empirics and Theory: The Behavioral Hybrid New Keynesian Model," Vniversitas Económica, Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, vol. 0(0), pages 1-41.
    14. Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 226-273, March.
    15. Tommaso Denti & Doron Ravid, 2023. "Robust Predictions in Games with Rational Inattention," Papers 2306.09964, arXiv.org.
    16. Ellison, Martin & Macaulay, Alistair, 2021. "A rational inattention unemployment trap," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt & Mats Köster, 2025. "Salient Cues and Complexity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 428-469, January.
    18. Rahul Bhui & Peiran Jiao, 2023. "Attention Constraints and Learning in Categories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5394-5404, September.
    19. Gondhi, Naveen, 2023. "Rational inattention, misallocation, and the aggregate economy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 50-75.
    20. Roc Armenter & Michèle Müller-Itten & Zachary Strangebye, 2021. "Geometric Methods for Finite Rational Inattention," Working Papers 21-30, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dpr:wpaper:1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.