Keynesian Fiscal Stimulus: What Have We Learned from the Great Recession?
What have we learned from the Great Recession about Keynesian fiscal stimulus? This article contains five sections that develop the following five points: (1) There is confusion about what constitutes Keynesian fiscal stimulus; (2) Economists are deeply divided about fiscal stimulus; (3) A fundamental error has been committed by an influential economist in estimating the recession magnitude of the Keynesian multiplier; (4) A fundamental error has been committed by two influential economists in their analysis of the impact of the 2008 tax rebate on consumption spending; (5) Advocates of fiscal stimulus in recession should support keeping government debt low in prosperity.
|Date of creation:||2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol. 34, No.2, 2012.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Purnell Hall, Newark, Delaware 19716|
Phone: (302) 831-2565
Fax: (302) 831-6968
Web page: http://lerner.udel.edu/departments/economics/department-economics/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Laurence S Seidman & Kenneth A Lewis, 2009. "Does Fiscal Stimulus Cause Too Much Debt?," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 201-205, October.
- Laurence Seidman, 2011. "Great Depression II," Challenge, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 54(1), pages 32-53, January.
- Kenneth A. Lewis & Laurence S. Seidman, 2010.
"Did the 2008 Rebate Fail? A Response to Taylor and Feldstein ,"
10-06, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
- Kenneth A. Lewis & Laurence S. Seidman, 2011. "Did the 2008 rebate fail? a response to Taylor and Feldstein," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 183-204, January.
- Kenneth A. Lewis & Laurence S. Seidman, 2011. "Did the 2008 Rebate Fail? A Response to Taylor and Feldstein," Working Papers 11-10, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
- Seidman Laurence, 2010. "Reducing Future Deficits While Stimulating Today's Economy," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 1-5, August.
- David S. Johnson & Jonathan A. Parker & Nicholas S. Souleles, 2004.
"Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001,"
NBER Working Papers
10784, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nicholas S. Souleles & Jonathan A. Parker & David S. Johnson, 2006. "Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1589-1610, December.
- Laurence Seidman, 2001. "Reviving Fiscal Policy," Challenge, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 17-42, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dlw:wpaper:11-11.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Saul Hoffman)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.