IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/96en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Demand Response in Germany: Technical Potential, Benefits and Regulatory Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Stede

Abstract

An increased flexibility of the electricity demand side through demand response (DR) is an opportunity to support the integration of renewable energies. By optimising the use of the generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure, DR reduces the need for costly investments and contributes to system security. There is a significant technical DR potential for load reduction from industrial production processes in Germany, as well as from cross-cutting technologies in industry and the tertiary sector.The availability of demand response as a system resource depends on the underlying type of demand. Already today energy-intensive industries market significant demand capacity in the German minute reserve. The DR literature reveals that there is a potential of several gigawatts of additional capacity available for at least one hour in Germany. Demand can also cover longer periods, but this often requires investment, for example in storage capacity for intermediate products.To enable the effective use and full remuneration of demand response, further improvements in power market design are discussed: (i) Enabling third parties (referred to as Demand Side Management Companies) to help business customers realise their flexibility potential; (ii) creating robust intraday and balancing prices in auction platforms as reference prices for longer-term contracts to stabilise revenue streams of flexibility providers; (iii) it needs to be further assessed whether additional catalysing instruments are necessary to initiate investment in new business processes or storage capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Stede, 2016. "Demand Response in Germany: Technical Potential, Benefits and Regulatory Challenges," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 96, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:96en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.532827.de/DIW_Roundup_96_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gils, Hans Christian, 2014. "Assessment of the theoretical demand response potential in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Strbac, Goran, 2008. "Demand side management: Benefits and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4419-4426, December.
    3. Paulus, Moritz & Borggrefe, Frieder, 2011. "The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 432-441, February.
    4. Bradley, Peter & Leach, Matthew & Torriti, Jacopo, 2013. "A review of the costs and benefits of demand response for electricity in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 312-327.
    5. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Zappa, William & Turkenburg, Wim C. & Faaij, André, 2016. "Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 48-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Purvins, Arturs & Gerbelova, Hana & Sereno, Luigi & Minnebo, Philip, 2021. "Social welfare impact from enhanced Trans-Asian electricity trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McPherson, Madeleine & Stoll, Brady, 2020. "Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Pang, Yuexia & He, Yongxiu & Jiao, Jie & Cai, Hua, 2020. "Power load demand response potential of secondary sectors in China: The case of western Inner Mongolia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Gils, Hans Christian, 2016. "Economic potential for future demand response in Germany – Modeling approach and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 401-415.
    4. Michael Schoepf & Martin Weibelzahl & Lisa Nowka, 2018. "The Impact of Substituting Production Technologies on the Economic Demand Response Potential in Industrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Paterakis, Nikolaos G. & Erdinç, Ozan & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 871-891.
    6. Müller, Theresa & Möst, Dominik, 2018. "Demand Response Potential: Available when Needed?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 181-198.
    7. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula, 2019. "Review and assessment of the different categories of demand response potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 280-294.
    8. Alasseri, Rajeev & Tripathi, Ashish & Joji Rao, T. & Sreekanth, K.J., 2017. "A review on implementation strategies for demand side management (DSM) in Kuwait through incentive-based demand response programs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 617-635.
    9. Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2015. "Demand side management in China: The context of China’s power industry reform," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 954-965.
    10. Stede, Jan & Arnold, Karin & Dufter, Christa & Holtz, Georg & von Roon, Serafin & Richstein, Jörn C., 2020. "The role of aggregators in facilitating industrial demand response: Evidence from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2020. "Industrial demand-side flexibility: A key element of a just energy transition and industrial development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    12. Klaucke, Franziska & Hoffmann, Christian & Hofmann, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Impact of the chlorine value chain on the demand response potential of the chloralkali process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Gils, Hans Christian, 2014. "Assessment of the theoretical demand response potential in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Liu, Yingqi, 2017. "Demand response and energy efficiency in the capacity resource procurement: Case studies of forward capacity markets in ISO New England, PJM and Great Britain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 271-282.
    15. Nolan, Sheila & Neu, Olivier & O’Malley, Mark, 2017. "Capacity value estimation of a load-shifting resource using a coupled building and power system model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 71-82.
    16. Ito, Masakazu & Takano, Akihisa & Shinji, Takao & Yagi, Takahiro & Hayashi, Yasuhiro, 2017. "Electricity adjustment for capacity market auction by a district heating and cooling system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 623-633.
    17. Valdes, Javier & Masip Macia, Yunesky & Dorner, Wolfgang & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Unsupervised grouping of industrial electricity demand profiles: Synthetic profiles for demand-side management applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    18. Stinner, Sebastian & Huchtemann, Kristian & Müller, Dirk, 2016. "Quantifying the operational flexibility of building energy systems with thermal energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 140-154.
    19. Bri‐Mathias S. Hodge & Himanshu Jain & Carlo Brancucci & Gab‐Su Seo & Magnus Korpås & Juha Kiviluoma & Hannele Holttinen & James Charles Smith & Antje Orths & Ana Estanqueiro & Lennart Söder & Damian , 2020. "Addressing technical challenges in 100% variable inverter‐based renewable energy power systems," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(5), September.
    20. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:96en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.