IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/werepe/49470.html

A non-cooperative repeated game for hunter-gatherers

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira, José Luis
  • Ruiz-Castillo, Javier

Abstract

We study the mode of production of the first populations of Homo erectus about 2.5 million years ago. It is characterized by a dual strategy unprecedented in human history: (i) a division of labor into big game hunting and gathering, and (ii) the sharing of the food obtained from both sources. We view these two characteristics as a form of increasing productivity through individual specialization, and a form of insurance. When big game hunters fail to capture a large piece –a highly frequent event–, they rely on the food collected by gatherers. In turn, a successful hunter who could only consume in situ a portion of a large kill, shares the catch with the rest of the group. We present a simple mathematical model of the situation, consisting of a non-cooperative repeated game whose equilibria exhibit the two innovations just mentioned. A sufficient condition for a sexual division of labor where women gather and men hunt is that men are relatively more productive than women in hunting. We compare this model with a number of alternatives found in the literature, and discuss its main shortcoming: the failure to include a third key feature of the hunting-gathering mode of production, namely, the specific study of intergenerational food transfers that may involve three types of agents –children, adults, and grandparents.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira, José Luis & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2026. "A non-cooperative repeated game for hunter-gatherers," UC3M Working papers. Economics 49470, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:49470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/622b5fe6-656f-403d-96a0-495384c2c846/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur J. Robson & Hillard S. Kaplan, 2006. "Viewpoint: The economics of hunter‐gatherer societies and the evolution of human characteristics," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 375-398, May.
    2. Gary S. Becker, 1981. "A Treatise on the Family," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck81-1, August.
    3. Ken Binmore, 2006. "The Origins of Fair Play," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006-14, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    4. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2025. "A review of Herman Pontzer's contribution to the science of metabolism and its implications for human evolucion," UC3M Working papers. Economics 48300, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    5. Ana Navarrete & Carel P. van Schaik & Karin Isler, 2011. "Energetics and the evolution of human brain size," Nature, Nature, vol. 480(7375), pages 91-93, December.
    6. Ken Binmore, 1998. "Game Theory and the Social Contract - Vol. 2: Just Playing," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 2, number 0262024446, December.
    7. Herman Pontzer & Mary H. Brown & David A. Raichlen & Holly Dunsworth & Brian Hare & Kara Walker & Amy Luke & Lara R. Dugas & Ramon Durazo-Arvizu & Dale Schoeller & Jacob Plange-Rhule & Pascal Bovet & , 2016. "Metabolic acceleration and the evolution of human brain size and life history," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 390-392, May.
    8. Arthur J. Robson & Hillard S. Kaplan, 2003. "The Evolution of Human Life Expectancy and Intelligence in Hunter-Gatherer Economies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 150-169, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesconi, Marco & Ghiglino, Christian & Perry, Motty, 2009. "On the Origin of the Family," IZA Discussion Papers 4637, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Dimant, Eugen, 2015. "On Peer Effects: Behavioral Contagion of (Un)Ethical Behavior and the Role of Social Identity," MPRA Paper 68732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bruce C Petersen, 2023. "An economic model and evidence of the evolution of human intelligence in the Middle Pleistocene: Climate change and assortative mating," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Francesconi, Marco & Ghiglino, Christian & Perry, Motty, 2016. "An evolutionary theory of monogamy," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 605-628.
    5. Griffiths, Barry, 2010. "Identification of Altruism among Team Members: Empirical Evidence from the Classroom and Laboratory," MPRA Paper 62208, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Feb 2015.
    6. James A. Brander, 2007. "Viewpoint: Sustainability: Malthus revisited?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Jacob L. Weisdorf, 2007. "Made for Toil: Natural selection at the dawn of agriculture," PSE Working Papers halshs-00587788, HAL.
    8. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2025. "A review of Herman Pontzer's contribution to the science of metabolism and its implications for human evolucion," UC3M Working papers. Economics 48300, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    9. Lamia Kandil & Hélène Perivier, 2017. "La division sexuée du travail dans les couples selon le statut marital en France - une étude à partir des enquêtes emploi du temps de 1985-1986, 1998-1999, et 2009-2010," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2017-03, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    10. Yan Yu, 2015. "The Male Breadwinner/Female Homemaker Model and Perceived Marital Stability: A Comparison of Chinese Wives in the United States and Urban China," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 34-47, March.
    11. Kota Ogasawara & Mizuki Komura, 2022. "Consequences of war: Japan’s demographic transition and the marriage market," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 1037-1069, July.
    12. Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto & Morales, Marina, 2018. "The effect of culture on the fertility decisions of immigrant women in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 15-28.
    13. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    14. Kanazawa, Satoshi, 2005. "Is "discrimination" necessary to explain the sex gap in earnings?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 269-287, April.
    15. Michael E. Martell & Peyton Nash, 2020. "For Love and Money? Earnings and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 260-294, September.
    16. Luis Garicano & Thomas N. Hubbard, 2016. "The Returns to Knowledge Hierarchies," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(4), pages 653-684.
    17. Laruelle, Annick & Valenciano, Federico, 2008. "Noncooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley-Shubik index," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 341-353, May.
    18. Kazungu, Khatibu & Byaro, Mwoya, 2023. "Road to Divorce in Tanzania: What are the Main Factors?," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 11(5), December.
    19. Corno, Lucia & Voena, Alessandra, 2023. "Child marriage as informal insurance: Empirical evidence and policy simulations," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Leanne Roncolato & Alex Roomets, 2020. "Who will change the “baby?” Examining the power of gender in an experimental setting," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 823-852, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:49470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eco.uc3m.es/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.