IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2008-06.html

Can One Really Estimate Nonstationary GARCH Models ?

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Francq

    (Crest)

  • Jean-Michel Zakoïan

    (Crest)

Abstract

Jensen and Rahbek (2004a) claim that consistency and asymptotic normality hold for the quasi-maximumlikelihood estimator (QMLE) of (!0, 0) in nonstationary ARCH(1) models. In fact their result onlyconcerns a constrained QMLE, in which the intercept is fixed, and under a reinforced nonstationaritycondition. Under this condition, we prove that the standard QMLE of 0 is strongly consistent andasymptotically normal. Numerical experiments reveal that QMLE of !0 is likely to be inconsistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Francq & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2008. "Can One Really Estimate Nonstationary GARCH Models ?," Working Papers 2008-06, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2008-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2008-06.pdf
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson, Daniel B., 1990. "Stationarity and Persistence in the GARCH(1,1) Model," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 318-334, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hafner, Christian M. & Preminger, Arie, 2015. "An ARCH model without intercept," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 13-17.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corbet, Shaen & Larkin, Charles & McMullan, Caroline, 2020. "The impact of industrial incidents on stock market volatility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Jumah, Adusei & Kunst, Robert M., 2001. "The Effects of Exchange-Rate Exposures on Equity Asset Markets," Economics Series 94, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    3. Guili Liao & Qimeng Liu & Rongmao Zhang & Shifang Zhang, 2022. "Rank test of unit‐root hypothesis with AR‐GARCH errors," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 695-719, September.
    4. Eric Beutner & Alexander Heinemann & Stephan Smeekes, 2019. "A General Framework for Prediction in Time Series Models," Papers 1902.01622, arXiv.org.
    5. Han, Heejoon & Park, Joon Y., 2008. "Time series properties of ARCH processes with persistent covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 275-292, October.
    6. Odunayo Magret Olarewaju & Timilehin John Olasehinde, 2017. "Naira-Dollar Exchange Rate Volatility Modeling Using Quadratic Moving Average Conditional Heteroscedasticity (QMACH)," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(36), pages 106-116, November.
    7. Gonzalo, Jesús & Lee, Tae-Hwy, 1995. "No lack of relative power of the Dickey-Fuller tests for unit roots," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 4512, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    8. Vahidin Jeleskovic & Mirko Meloni & Zahid Irshad Younas, 2020. "Cryptocurrencies: A Copula Based Approach for Asymmetric Risk Marginal Allocations," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202034, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    9. Uhlig, H.F.H.V.S., 1996. "Bayesian Vector Autoregressions with Stochastic Volatility," Other publications TiSEM 4fd55395-6830-46a2-9d18-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Olivier Wintenberger, 2013. "Continuous Invertibility and Stable QML Estimation of the EGARCH(1,1) Model," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(4), pages 846-867, December.
    11. Gilles Zumbach, 2010. "Volatility conditional on price trends," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 431-442.
    12. Iglesias, Emma M. & Linton, Oliver, 2009. "Estimation of tail thickness parameters from GJR-GARCH models," UC3M Working papers. Economics we094726, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    13. W. K. Li & Shiqing Ling & Michael McAleer, 2001. "A Survey of Recent Theoretical Results for Time Series Models with GARCH Errors," ISER Discussion Paper 0545, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    14. Andrea Bucci, 2020. "Realized Volatility Forecasting with Neural Networks," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 502-531.
    15. repec:ehu:biltok:5744 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Min Chen & Dong Li & Shiqing Ling, 2014. "Non-Stationarity And Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation On A Double Autoregressive Model," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 189-202, May.
    17. Harry-Paul Vander Elst, 2015. "FloGARCH: Realizing Long Memory and Asymmetries in Returns Valitility," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2015-12, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Jon Michel, 2020. "The Limiting Distribution of a Non‐Stationary Integer Valued GARCH(1,1) Process," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 351-356, March.
    19. Oliver Linton & Dajing Shang & Yang Yan, 2012. "Efficient estimation of conditional risk measures in a semiparametric GARCH model," CeMMAP working papers CWP25/12, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Charles, Amélie, 2010. "The day-of-the-week effects on the volatility: The role of the asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 143-152, April.
    21. Shusheng Ding & Tianxiang Cui & Yongmin Zhang & Jiawei Li, 2021. "Liquidity effects on oil volatility forecasting: From fintech perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2008-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.