IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprfm/0036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Private Information and the Design of Securities

Author

Listed:
  • Gabrielle Demange
  • Guy Laroque

Abstract

One often quoted reason for the incompleteness of financial markets is the fact that an informational asymmetry prevents entrepreneurs to float their company on the market. In fact, the privileged information that the owners have on their firms discourages rational financial investors and thins the market. The paper studies the validity of this argument in a model similar to Grossman-Stiglitz (1980). An entrepreneur who contemplates issuing a new security faces a trade-off between speculative gains, which arise from his privileged information, and an insurance motive, associated with the insurance provided by the stock market. We study the terms of this arbitrage as a function of the fundamentals of the economy: aggregate risk, risk tolerance, precision of the privileged information.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabrielle Demange & Guy Laroque, 1993. "Private Information and the Design of Securities," CEPR Financial Markets Paper 0036, European Science Foundation Network in Financial Markets, c/o C.E.P.R, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX..
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprfm:0036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David M. Frankel & Yu Jin, 2015. "Securitization and Lending Competition," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(4), pages 1383-1408.
    2. David Russ, 2020. "Multidimensional Noise and Non-Fundamental Information Diversity," Working Papers 201, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    3. Gabriella Chiesa & Giovanna Nicodano, 2003. "Privatization and Financial Market Development: Theoretical Issues," Working Papers 2003.1, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Kajii, A. & Hara, C., 2000. "On the Range of the Risk-Free Interest Rate in Incomplete Markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0030, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Gabrielle Demange & Guy Laroque, 1994. "Information asymétrique et émission d'actifs," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 45(3), pages 639-656.
    6. Arnold, Lutz G. & Zelzner, Sebastian, 2022. "Financial trading versus entrepreneurship: Competition for talent and negative feedback effects," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 186-199.
    7. Luis Angel Medran & Xavier Vives, 2004. "Regulating Insider Trading When Investment Matters," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 8(2), pages 199-277.
    8. García, Diego & Urošević, Branko, 2013. "Noise and aggregation of information in large markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 526-549.
    9. Marta Faias, 2004. "General equilibrium and endogenous creation of asset markets," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp454, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    10. Jin, Yu, 2012. "Essays on financial institutions and instability," ISU General Staff Papers 201201010800003361, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Shiller, Robert J., 1999. "Social security and institutions for intergenerational, intragenerational, and international risk-sharing," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 165-204, June.
    12. Han Ozsoylev, 2008. "Amplification and asymmetry in crashes and frenzies," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 157-181, March.
    13. Diego García & Branko Urosevic, 2004. "Noise and aggregation of information in large markets," Economics Working Papers 785, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    14. Russ, David, 2022. "Multidimensional noise and non-fundamental information diversity," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Kawamura, Enrique, 2004. "Investors's distrust and the marketing of new financial assets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 265-295, May.
    16. Arnold, Lutz Georg & Arnold, Lutz & Zelzner, Sebastian, 2016. "The Allocation of Talent to Financial Trading versus Production: Welfare and Employment Effects of Trading in General Equilibrium," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145688, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Insider Trading; Security Design;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprfm:0036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.