IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2023rp-22.html

Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis Pathways in Quebec

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Corkum
  • Tiffanie Perrault
  • Erin C. Strumpf

Abstract

In 2022, Canada saw nearly 28,900 new cases of breast cancer, making it the most prevalent cancer among women and the second most common across the entire Canadian population, following lung cancer. Delays in diagnosis can significantly worsen the condition and amplify existing inequalities. Despite Quebec setting a 17-day investigation timeframe after an abnormal mammography result back in 1999, the CEO of the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation bemoaned in October 2021 that the actual delay could sometimes extend up to 17 weeks. Drawing from scientific literature on cancer care, government reports, and expert interviews, this document delves into Quebec's diagnostic capabilities and performance. The authors compare breast cancer diagnostic innovations in Quebec with those in Alberta and Ontario, where diagnostic delays are comparatively shorter. They present practical strategies to accelerate and streamline the breast cancer diagnostic process, guiding readers toward essential resources for deeper insights. The authors recommend integrating high-risk individuals into Quebec's organized screening program, customizing the screening process, modernizing available imaging technologies and genetic tests, and enhancing communication methods. Read the article in PERSPECTIVES In 2022, Canada saw nearly 28,900 new cases of breast cancer, making it the most prevalent cancer among women and the second most common across the entire Canadian population, following lung cancer. Delays in diagnosis can significantly worsen the condition and amplify existing inequalities. Despite Quebec setting a 17-day investigation timeframe after an abnormal mammography result back in 1999, the CEO of the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation bemoaned in October 2021 that the actual delay could sometimes extend up to 17 weeks. Drawing from scientific literature on cancer care, government reports, and expert interviews, this document delves into Quebec's diagnostic capabilities and performance. The authors compare breast cancer diagnostic innovations in Quebec with those in Alberta and Ontario, where diagnostic delays are comparatively shorter. They present practical strategies to accelerate and streamline the breast cancer diagnostic process, guiding readers toward essential resources for deeper insights. The authors recommend integrating high-risk individuals into Quebec's organized screening program, customizing the screening process, modernizing available imaging technologies and genetic tests, and enhancing communication methods. Read the article in PERSPECTIVES

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Corkum & Tiffanie Perrault & Erin C. Strumpf, 2023. "Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis Pathways in Quebec," CIRANO Project Reports 2023rp-22, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2023rp-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2023RP-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Bertoni & Luca Corazzini & Silvana Robone, 2020. "The Good Outcome of Bad News," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(3), pages 372-409.
    2. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Tamar Oostrom & Abigail Ostriker & Heidi Williams, 2020. "Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(12), pages 3836-3870, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persson, Petra & Qiu, Xinyao & Rossin-Slater, Maya, 2021. "Family Spillover Effects of Marginal Diagnoses: The Case of ADHD," IZA Discussion Papers 14020, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Joseph P. Newhouse, 2021. "An Ounce of Prevention," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(2), pages 101-118, Spring.
    3. Marianne P. Bitler & Christopher S. Carpenter & Danea Horn, 2021. "Effects of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2667-2685, November.
    4. Brandyn F. Churchill & Laura E. Henkhaus & Emily C. Lawler, 2025. "Effect of vaccine recommendations on consumer and firm behavior," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 125-150, January.
    5. Abbasi, Ali & DiTraglia, Francis J. & Gazze, Ludovica & Pals, Bridget, 2023. "Hidden hazards and screening policy: Predicting undetected lead exposure in Illinois," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Nicodemo, Catia & Nicoletti, Cheti & Vidiella-Martin, Joaquim, 2024. "Starting School and ADHD: When Is It Time to Fly the Nest?," IZA Discussion Papers 17091, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Briscese, Guglielmo & Lacetera, Nicola & Macis, Mario & Tonin, Mirco, 2023. "Expectations, reference points, and compliance with COVID-19 social distancing measures," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Antinyan, A. & Bertoni, M. & Corazzini, L., 2020. "Cancer screening invitations in the developing world," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 20/13, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    9. Christine Sevilla-Dedieu & Nathalie Billaudeau & Morgane Le Guern & Audrey Arnaud & Alain Paraponaris, 2025. "Age In, Age Out: The (Un)intended Consequences of Targeted Screening Programs," AMSE Working Papers 2535, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    10. Rafkin, Charlie & Shreekumar, Advik & Vautrey, Pierre-Luc, 2021. "When guidance changes: Government stances and public beliefs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Antinyan, Armenak & Bertoni, Marco & Corazzini, Luca, 2021. "Cervical cancer screening invitations in low and middle income countries: Evidence from Armenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    12. Jason Abaluck & Leila Agha & David C. Chan Jr & Daniel Singer & Diana Zhu, 2020. "Fixing Misallocation with Guidelines: Awareness vs. Adherence," NBER Working Papers 27467, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Menares, Felipe & Muñoz, Pablo, 2025. "The impact of standardized disease-specific healthcare coverage," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    14. Meng ZHAO (Moe KONISHI), 2023. "Does Free Cancer Screening Make a Difference? Evidence from the effects of a free-coupon program in Japan," Discussion papers 23067, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    15. Antoine Marsaudon, 2022. "Do Hospital Stays Modify Locus of Control?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 257-277, May.
    16. Emily Oster, 2020. "Health Recommendations and Selection in Health Behaviors," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 143-160, June.
    17. Abbasi, Ali & Gazze, Ludovica & Pals, Bridget, 2022. "Hidden hazards and Screening Policy : Predicting Undetected Lead Exposure in Illinois Using Machine Learning," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1398, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    18. Engy Ziedan & Kosali I. Simon & Coady Wing, 2022. "Mortality Effects of Healthcare Supply Shocks: Evidence Using Linked Deaths and Electronic Health Records," NBER Working Papers 30553, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Rinaldi, Anna & Dellino, Pierfrancesco & Paradiso, Massimo, 2025. "Framing the loss: Preferences for vaccine hesitancy and gender effect in France and Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Vincenzo Carrieri & Maria De Paola & Francesca Gioia, 2021. "The health-economy trade-off during the Covid-19 pandemic: Communication matters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2023rp-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.