IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_11821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quad O’s Evolution: Subsequent Regulatory Effects from Existing Regulations on Shareholder Wealth

Author

Listed:
  • Scott A. Carson

Abstract

Quad O is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s methane reduction regulation that requires greater producer efficiency when methane is extracted by requiring efficient upstream, midstream, and downstream equipment. There are various times when Quad O was implemented and updated, and August 11th, 2012 was the first implementation period. Quad O’s second implementation was on January 1st, 2015, and this study evaluates oil and gas returns around Quad O’s early 2015 regulatory change. Oil and gas returns were mostly unaffected by the second Quad O implementation, indicating it is difficult to identify when firm returns responded to regulatory change. Equity to commodity markets interacted for each firm’s return. Exploration & production equity to Brent crude ratios are among the lowest commodity market risk in the industry. In contrast, equity and commodity markets place the next highest equity to commodity ratios to mid and downstream transportation & pipeline and refining & marketing firms, indicating comparative commodity to equity risk was higher closer to oil and gas extraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott A. Carson, 2025. "Quad O’s Evolution: Subsequent Regulatory Effects from Existing Regulations on Shareholder Wealth," CESifo Working Paper Series 11821, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11821.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carson, Scott Alan, 2020. "United States oil and gas stock returns with multi-factor pricing models: 2008–2018," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Sunil K. Mohanty & Mohan Nandha, 2011. "Oil Risk Exposure: The Case of the U.S. Oil and Gas Sector," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 165-191, February.
    3. Joskow, Paul L & Schmalensee, Richard, 1998. "The Political Economy of Market-Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 37-83, April.
    4. Carson, Scott Alan, 2020. "United States oil and gas stock returns with multi-factor pricing models: 2008-2018," Munich Reprints in Economics 84754, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Alan Carson, 2022. "Long-Term Daily Equity Returns Across Sectors of the Oil and Gas Industry, 2000–2019," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 125-143, March.
    2. Scott Alan Carson & Scott A. Carson, 2024. "Equity, Commodity, and Distillate Risks During Industrial Transformation: Innovation in the Oil & Gas Industry Using GARCH Difference-in-Decompositions," CESifo Working Paper Series 11534, CESifo.
    3. Mohammad Enamul Hoque & Soo-Wah Low & Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi & Lain-Tze Tee & Noor Azlan Ghazali, 2023. "Asymmetric and Lag Effects of Industry Risk Factors on the Malaysian Oil and Gas Stocks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    4. Scott Alan Carson & Scott A. Carson, 2023. "Equity, Commodity, and Distillate Risk for Oil Upstream Producers and Downstream Consumers," CESifo Working Paper Series 10426, CESifo.
    5. Scott Alan Carson & Wael M. Al-Sawai & Scott A. Carson, 2023. "Partially Adaptive Econometric Methods and Vertically Integrated Majors in the Oil and Gas Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 10733, CESifo.
    6. Scott Alan Carson & Scott A. Carson, 2022. "Diesel, Conventional Gas, Jet Fuel, and Natural Gas Equity and Commodity Project Risk across the Oil and Gas Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 10125, CESifo.
    7. Veith, Stefan & Werner, Jörg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 605-613, July.
    8. Stavins, Robert, 2001. "Lessons From the American Experiment With Market-Based Environmental Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-53, Resources for the Future.
    9. Richard Schmalensee & Robert N. Stavins, 2019. "Policy Evolution under the Clean Air Act," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 27-50, Fall.
    10. Sterner, Thomas & Muller, Adrian, 2006. "Output and Abatement Effects of Allocation Readjustment in Permit Trade," RFF Working Paper Series dp-06-49, Resources for the Future.
    11. Brockmann, Karl Ludwig & Koschel, Henrike & Schmidt, Tobias F. N., 1998. "Tradable SO-2-permits in the European Union: a practicable scheme for public utilities," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-15, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Considine, Timothy J. & Larson, Donald F., 2006. "The environment as a factor of production," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 645-662, November.
    13. Shaeri, Komeil & Adaoglu, Cahit & Katircioglu, Salih T., 2016. "Oil price risk exposure: A comparison of financial and non-financial subsectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 712-723.
    14. Brookshire, David S & Burness, H Stuart, 2001. "The Informational Role of the EPA SO2 Permit Auction," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 43-60, July.
    15. Meredith Fowlie & Mar Reguant & Stephen P. Ryan, 2016. "Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 249-302.
    16. Robert N. Stavins, 1998. "What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 69-88, Summer.
    17. Robert W. Hahn & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 267-294.
    18. Alex Dickson & Ian A. MacKenzie, 2022. "Permit Markets with Political and Market Distortions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(1), pages 227-255, May.
    19. Sunil K. Mohanty & Roar Aadland & Sjur Westgaard & Stein Frydenberg & Hilde Lillienskiold & Cecilie Kristensen, 2021. "Modelling Stock Returns and Risk Management in the Shipping Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Richard Schmalensee & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Lessons Learned from Three Decades of Experience with Cap and Trade," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 59-79.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environmental protection agency; regulation; quad-o; methane.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.