IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_10786.html

Consumer Search: What Can We Learn from Pre-Purchase Data?

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Honka
  • Stephan Seiler
  • Raluca Ursu

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly able to observe consumers’ behavior prior to a purchase, such as their navigation through a store or website and the products they consider. Such pre-purchase (or search) data can be valuable to researchers in a variety of ways: as an additional source of information to estimate consumer preferences, to understand how firms can influence the search process through marketing mix variables, and to analyze how limited information about products affects equilibrium market outcomes. We provide an overview of these three research areas with a particular emphasis on online and offline retailing.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Honka & Stephan Seiler & Raluca Ursu, 2023. "Consumer Search: What Can We Learn from Pre-Purchase Data?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10786, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp10786.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuxin Chen & Song Yao, 2017. "Sequential Search with Refinement: Model and Application with Click-Stream Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4345-4365, December.
    2. Ilya Morozov & Stephan Seiler & Xiaojing Dong & Liwen Hou, 2021. "Estimation of Preference Heterogeneity in Markets with Costly Search," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 871-899, September.
    3. Raluca M. Ursu, 2018. "The Power of Rankings: Quantifying the Effect of Rankings on Online Consumer Search and Purchase Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 530-552, August.
    4. Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "An empirical model of search with vertically differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(4), pages 729-757, December.
    5. Daniel M. Ringel & Bernd Skiera, 2016. "Visualizing Asymmetric Competition Among More Than 1,000 Products Using Big Search Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 511-534, May.
    6. Jia Liu & Olivier Toubia & Shawndra Hill, 2021. "Content-Based Model of Web Search Behavior: An Application to TV Show Search," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6378-6398, October.
    7. Nathan M. Fong, 2017. "How Targeting Affects Customer Search: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2353-2364, July.
    8. Sam K. Hui & Peter S. Fader & Eric T. Bradlow, 2009. "—The Traveling Salesman Goes Shopping: The Systematic Deviations of Grocery Paths from TSP Optimality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 566-572, 05-06.
    9. Bradley T. Shapiro, 2018. "Positive Spillovers and Free Riding in Advertising of Prescription Pharmaceuticals: The Case of Antidepressants," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(1), pages 381-437.
    10. Diamond, Peter A., 1971. "A model of price adjustment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 156-168, June.
    11. Hauser, John R & Wernerfelt, Birger, 1990. "An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 393-408, March.
    12. Ali Hortaçsu & Chad Syverson, 2004. "Product Differentiation, Search Costs, and Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: A Case Study of S&P 500 Index Funds," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(2), pages 403-456.
    13. Elisabeth Honka & Ali Hortaçsu & Maria Ana Vitorino, 2017. "Advertising, consumer awareness, and choice: evidence from the U.S. banking industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 48(3), pages 611-646, August.
    14. Robert, Jacques & Stahl, Dale O, II, 1993. "Informative Price Advertising in a Sequential Search Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 657-686, May.
    15. Stahl, Dale O, II, 1989. "Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(4), pages 700-712, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honka, Elisabeth & Seiler, Stephan & Ursu, Raluca, 2024. "Consumer search: What can we learn from pre-purchase data?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 114-129.
    2. Raluca Mihaela Ursu & Andrey Simonov & Eunkyung An, 2025. "Online Advertising as Passive Search," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1050-1073, February.
    3. Rafael P. Greminger, 2022. "Optimal Search and Discovery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3904-3924, May.
    4. Wilson, Chris M., 2010. "Ordered search and equilibrium obfuscation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 496-506, September.
    5. Chenshuo Sun, 2025. "How Does Prepopulating Search Bars with Keywords Affect Online Consumer Behavior? A Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 1217-1231, November.
    6. Sandro Shelegia & Chris M. Wilson, 2021. "A Generalized Model of Advertised Sales," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 195-223, February.
    7. Ilya Morozov & Anna Tuchman, 2024. "Where Does Advertising Content Lead You? We Created a Bookstore to Find Out," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 986-1001, September.
    8. Pedro M. Gardete & Megan Hunter, 2024. "Multiattribute Search: Empirical Evidence and Information Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 1052-1080, September.
    9. Carlin, Bruce I., 2009. "Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 278-287, March.
    10. Robert Donnelly & Ayush Kanodia & Ilya Morozov, 2024. "Welfare Effects of Personalized Rankings," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 92-113, January.
    11. Jae Hyen Chung & Pradeep Chintagunta & Sanjog Misra, 2025. "Simulated maximum likelihood estimation of the sequential search model," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 105-164, March.
    12. Francisco Silva & Samir Mamadehussene, 2020. "The Equivalence Between Sequential and Simultaneous Firm Decisions," Documentos de Trabajo 541, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    13. Vladimir Yankov, 2024. "In Search of a Risk‐Free Asset: Search Costs and Sticky Deposit Rates," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(5), pages 1053-1098, August.
    14. Jiarui Liu, 2021. "Sequential Search Models: A Pairwise Maximum Rank Approach," Papers 2104.13865, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    15. Jason Abaluck & Giovanni Compiani, 2020. "A Method to Estimate Discrete Choice Models that is Robust to Consumer Search," NBER Working Papers 26849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Raluca Mihaela Ursu & Tülin Erdem & Qingliang Wang & Qianyun Zhang, 2024. "Prior Information and Consumer Search: Evidence from Eye Tracking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8685-8708, December.
    17. Shelegia, Sandro & Wilson, Chris, 2016. "A Generalized Model of Sales," EconStor Preprints 147411, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Ivy Chu Dang & Raluca M. Ursu & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2026. "Going back to move forward? How search revisits on a website we built inform us about search outcomes," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-39, December.
    19. Alexandre de Corniere, 2013. "Search Advertising," Economics Series Working Papers 649, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. Katja Seim & Michael Sinkinson, 2016. "Mixed pricing in online marketplaces," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 129-155, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.