IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/20-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determination of the 2020 U.S. Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Using Administrative Records and Statistical Methodology Technical Report

Author

Listed:
  • John M. Abowd
  • William R. Bell
  • J. David Brown
  • Michael B. Hawes
  • Misty L. Heggeness
  • Andrew D. Keller
  • Vincent T. Mule Jr.
  • Joseph L. Schafer
  • Matthew Spence
  • Lawrence Warren
  • Moises Yi

Abstract

This report documents the efforts of the Census Bureau’s Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) Internal Expert Panel (IEP) and Technical Working Group (TWG) toward the use of multiple data sources to produce block-level statistics on the citizen voting-age population for use in enforcing the Voting Rights Act. It describes the administrative, survey, and census data sources used, and the four approaches developed for combining these data to produce CVAP estimates. It also discusses other aspects of the estimation process, including how records were linked across the multiple data sources, and the measures taken to protect the confidentiality of the data.

Suggested Citation

  • John M. Abowd & William R. Bell & J. David Brown & Michael B. Hawes & Misty L. Heggeness & Andrew D. Keller & Vincent T. Mule Jr. & Joseph L. Schafer & Matthew Spence & Lawrence Warren & Moises Yi, 2020. "Determination of the 2020 U.S. Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Using Administrative Records and Statistical Methodology Technical Report," Working Papers 20-33, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:20-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2020/CES-WP-20-33.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Kuha, Jouni, 2018. "Two-step estimation of models between latent classes and external variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85161, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. J. David Brown & Misty L. Heggeness & Suzanne M. Dorinski & Lawrence Warren & Moises Yi, 2018. "Understanding the Quality of Alternative Citizenship Data Sources for the 2020 Census," Working Papers 18-38, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Chung H. & Loken E. & Schafer J.L., 2004. "Difficulties in Drawing Inferences With Finite-Mixture Models: A Simple Example With a Simple Solution," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pages 152-158, May.
    4. Zsuzsa Bakk & Jouni Kuha, 2018. "Two-Step Estimation of Models Between Latent Classes and External Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 871-892, December.
    5. Frauke Kreuter & Ting Yan & Roger Tourangeau, 2008. "Good item or bad—can latent class analysis tell?: the utility of latent class analysis for the evaluation of survey questions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(3), pages 723-738, June.
    6. Sylvia. Richardson & Peter J. Green, 1997. "On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 731-792.
    7. Paul P. Biemer & Christopher Wiesen, 2002. "Measurement error evaluation of self‐reported drug use: a latent class analysis of the US National Household Survey on Drug Abuse," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(1), pages 97-119, February.
    8. Mary Layne & Deborah Wagner & Cynthia Rothhaas, 2014. "Estimating Record Linkage False Match Rate for the Person Identification Validation System," CARRA Working Papers 2014-02, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    9. Laura McKenna, 2018. "Disclosure Avoidance Techniques Used for the 1970 through 2010 Decennial Censuses of Population and Housing," Working Papers 18-47, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meyer, Bruce D. & Wyse, Angela & Corinth, Kevin, 2023. "The size and Census coverage of the U.S. homeless population," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suh, Ellie, 2022. "Can't save or won't save: financial resilience and discretionary retirement saving among British adults in their thirties and forties," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110492, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Kuha, Jouni, 2020. "Relating latent class membership to external variables: an overview," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Giorgio Eduardo Montanari & Marco Doretti & Maria Francesca Marino, 2022. "Model-based two-way clustering of second-level units in ordinal multilevel latent Markov models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 457-485, June.
    4. Hwan Chung & Brian P. Flaherty & Joseph L. Schafer, 2006. "Latent class logistic regression: application to marijuana use and attitudes among high school seniors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 723-743, October.
    5. J. David Brown & Misty L. Heggeness & Suzanne M. Dorinski & Lawrence Warren & Moises Yi, 2019. "Predicting the Effect of Adding a Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1173-1194, August.
    6. Yajing Zhu & Fiona Steele & Irini Moustaki, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1029-1050, June.
    7. Di Mari, Roberto & Bakk, Zsuzsa & Oser, Jennifer & Kuha, Jouni, 2023. "A two-step estimator for multilevel latent class analysis with covariates," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119994, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Keefe Murphy & T. Brendan Murphy & Raffaella Piccarreta & I. Claire Gormley, 2021. "Clustering longitudinal life‐course sequences using mixtures of exponential‐distance models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(4), pages 1414-1451, October.
    9. Zhu, Yajing & Steele, Fiona & Moustaki, Irini, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103104, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Brian Gin & Nicholas Sim & Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2020. "A Dyadic IRT Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 815-836, September.
    11. Kuha, Jouni & Zhang, Siliang & Steele, Fiona, 2023. "Latent variable models for multivariate dyadic data with zero inflation: analysis of intergenerational exchanges of family support," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Roberto Mari & Antonello Maruotti, 2022. "A two-step estimator for generalized linear models for longitudinal data with time-varying measurement error," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 273-300, June.
    13. Shuang Zhang & Xingdong Feng, 2022. "Distributed identification of heterogeneous treatment effects," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 57-89, March.
    14. Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman, 2013. "Estimating Obesity Rates in Europe in the Presence of Self-Reporting Errors," Economics Department Working Paper Series n236-13.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    15. Li, Feng & Kang, Yanfei, 2018. "Improving forecasting performance using covariate-dependent copula models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 456-476.
    16. Sik-Yum Lee, 2006. "Bayesian Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Equation Models with Nonignorable Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 541-564, September.
    17. Jennifer Oser & Marc Hooghe & Zsuzsa Bakk & Roberto Mari, 2023. "Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999-2009-2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4915-4933, October.
    18. Fisher, Mark & Jensen, Mark J., 2022. "Bayesian nonparametric learning of how skill is distributed across the mutual fund industry," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 131-153.
    19. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    20. Randall Akee & Leah R. Clark, 2023. "Universal Preschool Lottery Admissions and Its Effects on Long-Run Earnings and Outcomes," Working Papers 23-09, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    citizenship; administrative records; voting-age population; big data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:20-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.