IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/928.html

Hierarchical risk parity variants for cryptocurrency portfolios: denoising, detoning, tail dependence, embeddings and statistical inference, 2020–2026

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Matys
  • Federico Martín Rodriguez
  • Emiliano Delfau

Abstract

We extend the 2025 conference study on Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) by addressing its two stated methodological follow-ups (Marchenko-Pastur denoising and spectral detoning) and by evaluating abroader cross-section of portfolio construction choices on a survivorship-bias-corrected, point-in-time Binance universe (146 ever-included symbols, 2020–2026). The comparison includes 27 constructed strategies spanning HRP-family variants, risk-based allocators, nested-clustering optimisers, momentum rules, and signal-aware extensions. Across 76 monthly rebalances, the HRP-family variants remain tightly clustered in risk-adjusted performance (annualized Sharpe 0.69 - 0.75), and this result persists under a 547- cell hyperparameter sweep (combined Hansen Superior Predictive Ability (SPA) pconsistent = 0.91). Strategies that alter the allocation step produce larger dispersion (notably the Minimum Variance Portfolio (MVP) , the Correlation-Regularised Iterative Shrinkage Portfolio (CRISP), the Nested Clustered Optimization with CRISP allocation (NCO–CRISP), and Nested Clustered Optimization (NCO)), with CRISP and NCO–CRISP significant in pairwise Ledoit–Wolf tests versus base line HRP in both full and post-COVID windows. However, after accounting for multiple comparisons, the headline SPA does not reject (pconsistent = 0.51), and the Deflated Sharpe Ratio (DSR) is directionally consistent with that conclusion. Post-COVID results indicate strong regime sensitivity: diversified HRPvariants lose 51–64% of capital while Bitcoin (BTC) and BTC-concentrating allocators hold up better. We also revise a nearlier interpretation on cluster stability: over the full panel, Pearson-based clustering is more stable than lower- tail dependence at monthly frequency. Overall, the evidence supports a cautious interpretation: within this universe, horizon, and search space, allocation choices are more strongly associated with performance differences than clustering perturbations, but those edges remain statistically fragile under search-adjusted inference.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Matys & Federico Martín Rodriguez & Emiliano Delfau, 2026. "Hierarchical risk parity variants for cryptocurrency portfolios: denoising, detoning, tail dependence, embeddings and statistical inference, 2020–2026," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 928, Universidad del CEMA.
    • Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/sites/default/files/2026-06/dt928.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Patton & Dimitris Politis & Halbert White, 2009. "Correction to “Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap” by D. Politis and H. White," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 372-375.
    2. Barroso, Pedro & Santa-Clara, Pedro, 2015. "Momentum has its moments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 111-120.
    3. R. Mantegna, 1999. "Hierarchical structure in financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 193-197, September.
    4. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    5. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2004. "A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 365-411, February.
    6. Bernd Johannes Wuebben, 2026. "Beyond De Prado and Cotton: Hierarchical and Iterative Methods for General Mean-Variance Portfolios," Papers 2604.23833, arXiv.org.
    7. Hansen, Peter Reinhard, 2005. "A Test for Superior Predictive Ability," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 23, pages 365-380, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernandez-Perez, Adrian & Fuertes, Ana-Maria & Miffre, Joëlle, 2019. "A comprehensive appraisal of style-integration methods," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 134-150.
    2. Andrea Di Iura, 2022. "Comparison of empirical and shrinkage correlation algorithm for clustering methods in the futures market," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Aleksejs Krecetovs & Pasquale Della Corte, 2016. "Macro uncertainty and currency premia," 2016 Meeting Papers 624, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. MohammadAmin Fazli & Parsa Alian & Ali Owfi & Erfan Loghmani, 2021. "RPS: Portfolio Asset Selection using Graph based Representation Learning," Papers 2111.15634, arXiv.org.
    5. Papantonis, Ioannis & Rompolis, Leonidas & Tzavalis, Elias, 2023. "Improving variance forecasts: The role of Realized Variance features," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1221-1237.
    6. Nicoló Musmeci & Tomaso Aste & T Di Matteo, 2015. "Relation between Financial Market Structure and the Real Economy: Comparison between Clustering Methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Musmeci, Nicoló & Aste, Tomaso & Di Matteo, T., 2015. "Relation between financial market structure and the real economy: comparison between clustering methods," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61644, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Papantonis Ioannis & Rompolis Leonidas S. & Tzavalis Elias & Agapitos Orestis, 2023. "Augmenting the Realized-GARCH: the role of signed-jumps, attenuation-biases and long-memory effects," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 27(2), pages 171-198, April.
    9. Sumanjay Dutta & Shashi Jain, 2023. "Precision versus Shrinkage: A Comparative Analysis of Covariance Estimation Methods for Portfolio Allocation," Papers 2305.11298, arXiv.org.
    10. Nicol'o Musmeci & Tomaso Aste & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2014. "Risk diversification: a study of persistence with a filtered correlation-network approach," Papers 1410.5621, arXiv.org.
    11. Bracht, Eamon & Brunner, Robert & McMullin, Jeff, 2025. "Towards a unified approach to industry recovery: Insights from intraday stock data and advanced community detection methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 669(C).
    12. Luis Lorenzo & Javier Arroyo, 2022. "Analysis of the cryptocurrency market using different prototype-based clustering techniques," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-46, December.
    13. Kim, Myeong Jun & Park, Sung Y., 2016. "Optimal conditional hedge ratio: A simple shrinkage estimation approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 139-156.
    14. Ruixue Jing & Luis Enrique Correa Rocha, 2026. "When market boundaries weaken: Network reconfiguration and regime-dependent cross-asset spillovers," Papers 2605.30442, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    15. Seyed Soheil Hosseini & Nick Wormald & Tianhai Tian, 2019. "A Weight-based Information Filtration Algorithm for Stock-Correlation Networks," Papers 1904.06007, arXiv.org.
    16. Xyngis, Georgios, 2017. "Business-cycle variation in macroeconomic uncertainty and the cross-section of expected returns: Evidence for scale-dependent risks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 43-65.
    17. Nicolo Musmeci & Tomaso Aste & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2014. "Relation between Financial Market Structure and the Real Economy: Comparison between Clustering Methods," Papers 1406.0496, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    18. Minyou Fan & Youwei Li & Ming Liao & Jiadong Liu, 2022. "A reexamination of factor momentum: How strong is it?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 585-615, August.
    19. Matteo Barigozzi & Christian Brownlees, 2019. "NETS: Network estimation for time series," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 347-364, April.
    20. Christian Bongiorno & Efstratios Manolakis & Rosario Nunzio Mantegna, 2025. "End-to-End Large Portfolio Optimization for Variance Minimization with Neural Networks through Covariance Cleaning," Papers 2507.01918, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucila Solla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.