IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cea/doctra/e2005_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A use-side trade margins matrix for the Andalusian economy

Author

Listed:
  • José M. Rueda-Cantuche

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide)

  • Antonio Titos Moreno

    (Universidad de Córdoba)

  • Marisa Asensio Pardo

    (Instituto de Estadística de Andalucía)

Abstract

According to the National Accounting Systems proposed by United Nations (1993) and Eurostat (1996), use and make (or supply) matrices should be measured before goods and services are conveyed to the markets (basic values). Actually, the make table is defined in basic values (excluding trade and transport margins and net commodity taxes) whereas the use table is in purchasers' values (including them). This paper shows how these margins and taxes can be removed from the use table with the purpose of entering both of them in the so-called material balance equation. With respect to trade margins, our approach is based on the use-side procedure from the ESA-95 Input-Output Manual (Eurostat, 2002) and is also being applied to the forthcoming 2000 Andalusian Input-Output Framework.

Suggested Citation

  • José M. Rueda-Cantuche & Antonio Titos Moreno & Marisa Asensio Pardo, 2005. "A use-side trade margins matrix for the Andalusian economy," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2005/06, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  • Handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2005_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/E200506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joe Mattey & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in U.S. Manufacturing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 16, pages 285-305, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Joe Mattey & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in U.S. Manufacturing," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 16, pages 285-305 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. J. Harvey Edmonston, 1952. "A Treatment of Multiple-Process Industries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(4), pages 557-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2005. "Estimating interregional trade flows in Andalusia (Spain)," ERSA conference papers ersa05p245, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thijs ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2009. "The Construction of Input–Output Coefficients Matrices in an Axiomatic Context: Some Further Considerations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 6, pages 77-101, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Thijs Ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2005. "Output and Employment Input-Output Multipliers on the basis of Use and Make Matrices," ERSA conference papers ersa05p282, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Louis Mesnard, 2011. "Negatives in symmetric input–output tables: the impossible quest for the Holy Grail," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(2), pages 427-454, April.
    4. Thijs ten Raa & José M. Rueda-Cantuche, 2021. "The Problem of Negatives Generated by the Commodity Technology Model in Input-Output Analysis: A Review of the Solutions," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Efficiency and Input-Output Analyses Theory and Applications, chapter 18, pages 319-338, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    6. Joe P. Mattey & Steven Strongin, 1997. "Factor utilization and margins for adjusting output: evidence from manufacturing plants," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 3-17.
    7. MESNARD, Louis de, 2008. "On the impossibility of calculating the product technology in the Supply-Use model," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2008-06, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    8. Soklis, George, 2009. "The Conversion of the Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review," MPRA Paper 46873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Merciai, Stefano & Heijungs, Reinout, 2014. "Balance issues in monetary input–output tables," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 69-74.
    10. Xesús Pereira López & Melchor Fernández Fernández & André Carrascal Incera, 2012. "Algunas consideraciones acerca de los modelos input-output rectangulares," Documentos de trabajo - Analise Economica 0049, IDEGA - Instituto Universitario de Estudios e Desenvolvemento de Galicia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Input-output analysis; use and make matrices; trade margins; National Accounts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
    • C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2005_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcanges.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Mérida The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Susana Mérida to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcanges.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.