IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0gt458qt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Carpool Potential for Home-to-Work SOV Commuters Using a Scalable and Practical Simulation Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Diyi
  • Fan, Huiying
  • Guin, Angshuman
  • Guensler, Randall

Abstract

Given that morning peak period vehicle occupancy rates are generally 1.1 to 1.2 persons per vehicle in urban areas, transportation planners have long argued that effective carpooling strategies could significantly reduce traffic congestion and the carbon footprint of commuters. Community-based carpooling, which is designed to match drivers and passengers that reside within subregions and that are traveling to similar destination zones, can be exploited once technology, communication, demographic, and economic barriers are overcome. While community-based carpool has the potential to provide sustainability benefits, integration into transportation plans and models is not prevalent, due to the lack of appropriate analytical tools. CarpoolSim is a new scalable analytical framework designed evaluate the potential performance and impact of intelligent carpooling system (ICS) for regional networks. Designed to be directly integrated into the travel demand modeling process, CarpoolSim uses a two-stage approach: 1) a filtering step with a set of comprehensive filtering conditions, to eliminate unreasonable carpool matches, given spatiotemporal constraints; and 2) an optimization step, to match as many carpools as possible (and eliminate any remaining assignment conflicts). Experiments using trip-level outputs from the Atlanta Regional Commission’s activity-based travel demand model (ABM) show that, under conservative carpool matching constraints, about 24.1% of candidate single occupancy home-to-work commute trips to major employment centers along the I-85 corridor in Atlanta, GA could be carpooled by direct carpool. More than 19.2% of the same candidate commute trips could be carpooled via park-and-ride. Sensitivity analyses were applied. Among all of the control parameters, the minimum ratio between shared trip and individual trips travel time has the greatest impact on results. Although only 26,029 trips are selected for carpool matching (less than 0.5% of total daily trips originating near I-85), the experiments show that the potential for intelligent carpooling systems to manage commute trips to major employment center is reasonable, considering the spatiotemporal travel constraints of these travelers. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Diyi & Fan, Huiying & Guin, Angshuman & Guensler, Randall, 2024. "Evaluating Carpool Potential for Home-to-Work SOV Commuters Using a Scalable and Practical Simulation Framework," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0gt458qt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0gt458qt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0gt458qt.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meyer, Michael D., 1999. "Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 575-599.
    2. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1999. "Carpooling and congestion pricing in a multilane highway with high-occupancy-vehicle lanes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 139-155, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    2. Goulden, Murray & Ryley, Tim & Dingwall, Robert, 2014. "Beyond ‘predict and provide’: UK transport, the growth paradigm and climate change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 139-147.
    3. Zhong, Lin & Zhang, Kenan & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Dynamic carpool in morning commute: Role of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy-toll (HOT) lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 98-119.
    4. Chu, Singfat, 2015. "Car restraint policies and mileage in Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 404-412.
    5. Wang, Jing-Peng & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2019. "Dynamic ridesharing with variable-ratio charging-compensation scheme for morning commute," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 390-415.
    6. Small, Kenneth A. & Yan, Jia, 2001. "The Value of "Value Pricing" of Roads: Second-Best Pricing and Product Differentiation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 310-336, March.
    7. Zhao, Zhan & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Zhao, Jinhua, 2018. "Detecting pattern changes in individual travel behavior: A Bayesian approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 73-88.
    8. Guo, Zhan, 2013. "Does residential parking supply affect household car ownership? The case of New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 18-28.
    9. Habibian, Meeghat & Kermanshah, Mohammad, 2013. "Coping with congestion: Understanding the role of simultaneous transportation demand management policies on commuters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 229-237.
    10. Tao, Sui & Cheng, Long & He, Sylvia & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Examining the non-linear effects of transit accessibility on daily trip duration: A focus on the low-income population," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Di, Xuan & Ma, Rui & Liu, Henry X. & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2018. "A link-node reformulation of ridesharing user equilibrium with network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 230-255.
    12. Chidambaram, Bhuvanachithra & Janssen, Marco A. & Rommel, Jens & Zikos, Dimitrios, 2014. "Commuters’ mode choice as a coordination problem: A framed field experiment on traffic policy in Hyderabad, India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 9-22.
    13. Yang, Hai & Meng, Qiang, 2000. "Highway pricing and capacity choice in a road network under a build-operate-transfer scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 207-222, April.
    14. Salvatore Cafiso & Alessandro Di Graziano & Tullio Giuffrè & Giuseppina Pappalardo & Alessandro Severino, 2022. "Managed Lane as Strategy for Traffic Flow and Safety: A Case Study of Catania Ring Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Bae, Sang Hoo & Sarkis, Joseph & Yoo, Chung Sik, 2011. "Greening transportation fleets: Insights from a two-stage game theoretic model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 793-807.
    16. Xueyan Wei & Weijie Yu & Wei Wang & De Zhao & Xuedong Hua, 2020. "Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Traffic Restriction Policy by Jointly Considering Carpool Exemptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Tal, Gil & Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit, 2011. "Understanding the role of the forecast-maker in overestimation forecasts of policy impacts: The case of Travel Demand Management policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 389-400, June.
    18. Vo, Khoa D. & Lam, William H.K. & Chen, Anthony & Shao, Hu, 2020. "A household optimum utility approach for modeling joint activity-travel choices in congested road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 93-125.
    19. Erik T. Verhoef & Kenneth A. Small, 1999. "Product Differentiation on Roads: Second-Best Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneity under Public and Private Ownership," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-066/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Kavta, Kuldeep & Goswami, Arkopal K., 2022. "Estimating mode choice of motorized two-wheeler commuters under the influence of combined travel demand management measures: An ICLV modeling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 327-335.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0gt458qt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.