IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/21961.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capital Markets Union and the fintech opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Demertzis
  • Silvia Merler
  • Guntram B. Wolff

Abstract

Complementing Europe’s bank-based system with deeper capital markets and more cross-border financial integration promises benefits, but despite long-running debate and policy action, financial system change remains slow. Fintech has the potential to change financial intermediation structures substantially. It could disrupt existing financial intermediation with new business models empowered by intelligent algorithms, big data, cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Lower costs and potentially better consumer experiences could be the driving forces....

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Demertzis & Silvia Merler & Guntram B. Wolff, 2017. "Capital Markets Union and the fintech opportunity," Policy Contributions 21961, Bruegel.
    • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:21961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/PC-22-2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Sapir & Dirk Schoenmaker & Nicolas Veron, 2017. "Making the Best of Brexit for the EU-27 Financial System," Policy Briefs PB17-8, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. Sam Langfield & Marco Pagano, 2016. "Bank bias in Europe: effects on systemic risk and growth," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 31(85), pages 51-106.
    3. André Sapir & Guntram B. Wolff, 2013. "The neglected side of banking union- reshaping Europe’s financial system," Policy Contributions 792, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Sapir & Nicolas Véron & Guntram B. Wolff, 2018. "Making a reality of Europe’s Capital Markets Union," Policy Contributions 25326, Bruegel.
    2. Rolf Strauch & Saioa Armendáriz & Angel Gavilán & Ricardo Sousa & John Berrigan & Dirk Schoenmaker & Rick Watson & Paul Richards, 2018. "Cross-border capital flows and capital markets union: Quo vadis Europe?," Discussion Papers 3, European Stability Mechanism, revised 27 Oct 2021.
    3. Fritz Breuss, 2016. "The Crisis Management of the ECB," WIFO Working Papers 507, WIFO.
    4. Koetter, Michael & Krause, Thomas & Tonzer, Lena, 2019. "Delay determinants of European Banking Union implementation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-20.
    5. Ivica Klinac & Roberto Ercegovac & Mario Pecaric, 2021. "Post Crisis Banking Sector Regulation And European Union Economic Growth Nexus," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 15-26, November.
    6. repec:zbw:bofitp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201505061169 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Christopher Gandrud & Mark Hallerberg, 2015. "Does Banking Union Worsen the EU's Democratic Deficit? The Need for Greater Supervisory Data Transparency," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 769-785, July.
    8. Simon Schumacher & Stephan Paul, 2017. "Capital Markets Union – Promising Prospects for Corporate Financing?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(3), pages 289-304, August.
    9. Demary, Markus, 2017. "The European derivatives market after Brexit," IW-Kurzberichte 22.2017, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    10. Shikha Singh & Mandira Sarma, 2020. "Financial Structure and Stability: An Empirical Exploration," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 9(special i), pages 9-32.
    11. Mélise Jaud & Madina Kukenova & Martin Strieborny, 2009. "Financial dependence and intensive margin of trade," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575005, HAL.
    12. Abbassi, Puriya & Iyer, Rajkamal & Peydró, José-Luis & Tous, Francesc R., 2016. "Securities trading by banks and credit supply: Micro-evidence from the crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 569-594.
    13. Maylis Avaro & Henri Sterdyniak, 2014. "Banking union: a solution to the euro zone crisis?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 193-241.
    14. Délèze, Frédéric & Korkeamäki, Timo, 2018. "Interest rate risk management with debt issues: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Franke, Günter & Krahnen, Jan Pieter, 2017. "SME funding without banks? On the interplay of banks and markets," SAFE White Paper Series 44, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    16. Leroy, Aurélien & Pop, Adrian, 2019. "Macro-financial linkages: The role of the institutional framework," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 75-97.
    17. Galanti, Sébastien & Leroy, Aurélien & Vaubourg, Anne-Gaël, 2022. "Investment and access to external finance in Europe: Does analyst coverage matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Boneva, Lena & Linton, Oliver, 2017. "A discrete choice model for large heterogeneous panels with interactive fixed effects with an application to the determinants of corporate bond issuance," Bank of England working papers 640, Bank of England.
    19. Jan-Pieter Krahnen & Felix Noth & Ulrich Schüwer, 2017. "Structural Reforms in Banking: The Role of Trading," Journal of Financial Regulation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 66-88.
    20. Ádám Banai & Szilárd Erhart & Nikolett Vágó & Péter Varga, 2016. "How to set listing criteria for small and medium-sized enterprises in Hungary?," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 15(3), pages 79-109.
    21. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2019. "Lack of international risk management in BREXIT?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 103-160, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:21961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.