IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2026_742.html

AI Overview or Overreach? Google’s Strategic Deployment of Generative AI in Search

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Ng

  • Michael Wessel

Abstract

In May 2024, Google introduced AI Overviews, which synthesize search results into direct answers on the search engine results page, contributing to the growing prevalence of zero-click searches. Notably, Google does not employ AI Overviews for every search query. The key to understanding this selectivity lies in the heterogeneity of search intent, and we argue that AI Overviews are best understood as a strategic instrument for maximizing average revenue per user. We develop a theoretical framework in which a monopolist search platform decides whether to deploy AI Overviews across queries that differ in their search intent along two dimensions: whether the search is exploratory or targeted, and whether it is monetizable. For each intent type, we derive conditions under which the platform benefits from deployment and generate testable hypotheses. To test these predictions, we construct a novel dataset of over 2,000 Google search queries and 15,118 search engine results page observations, where AI Overviews appeared in 31.2% of searches. Consistent with revenue maximization, we find that deployment patterns vary systematically across intent types: for exploratory queries, AI Overviews are deployed by default and withheld only when organic results already suffice or source quality is too low; for targeted queries, deployment is rare and occurs only when the platform lacks confidence in the organic match. Across all intent types, deployment exhibits an inverted-U relationship with source quality. Our findings provide empirical evidence that AI Overview deployment varies strategically with search intent and that AIOs can be characterized as a novel form of platform self-preferencing, with implications for content creators, advertisers, and regulators concerned with platform market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Ng & Michael Wessel, 2026. "AI Overview or Overreach? Google’s Strategic Deployment of Generative AI in Search," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2026_742, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2026_742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp742
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sha Yang & Anindya Ghose, 2010. "Analyzing the Relationship Between Organic and Sponsored Search Advertising: Positive, Negative, or Zero Interdependence?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 602-623, 07-08.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abou Nabout, Nadia & Skiera, Bernd, 2012. "Return on Quality Improvements in Search Engine Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 141-154.
    2. Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb & Sang Pil Han, 2013. "How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 613-631, September.
    3. Mary Beth McCabe & Richard Weaver, 2018. "Social Media Marketing Strategies For Educational Programs," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 53-62.
    4. Haruvy, Ernan & Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T.L., 2016. "Measuring the Impact of Price Guarantees on Bidding in Consumer Online Auctions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 96-108.
    5. Krzysztof BORODAKO & Jadwiga BERBEKA & Michał RUDNICKI & Mariusz ŠAPCZYŃSKI, 2021. "Online Visibility and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Performance: The Scope of Interrelatedness," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 157-173, August.
    6. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Jeonghye Choi & David R. Bell & Leonard M. Lodish, 2012. "Traditional and IS-Enabled Customer Acquisition on the Internet," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 754-769, April.
    8. Fei Long & Kinshuk Jerath & Miklos Sarvary, 2022. "Designing an Online Retail Marketplace: Leveraging Information from Sponsored Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 115-138, January.
    9. Sviták, Jan & Tichem, Jan & Haasbeek, Stefan, 2021. "Price effects of search advertising restrictions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Haoyan Sun & Ming Fan & Yong Tan, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Seller Advertising Strategies in an Online Marketplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 37-56, March.
    11. Raluca Mihaela Ursu & Andrey Simonov & Eunkyung An, 2025. "Online Advertising as Passive Search," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1050-1073, February.
    12. Ravneet Singh Bhandari & Ajay Bansal, 2018. "Impact of Search Engine Optimization as a Marketing Tool," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 23-36, June.
    13. Kirthi Kalyanam & John McAteer & Jonathan Marek & James Hodges & Lifeng Lin, 2018. "Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-42, March.
    14. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    15. Michael Arnold & Éric Darmon & Thierry Pénard, 2012. "To Sponsor or Not to Sponsor: Sponsored Search Auctions with Organic Links," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201207, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    16. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    17. Raluca M. Ursu, 2018. "The Power of Rankings: Quantifying the Effect of Rankings on Online Consumer Search and Purchase Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 530-552, August.
    18. Cuciurhan Mihaela M.D Student & Asist. Prof. Patricia Bertea Ph. D, 2015. "Search Engine Advertising: To Click Or Not To Click On Sponsored Ads," Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(24), pages 85-92, APRIL.
    19. Ran Pan & Juan Feng, 2025. "Better Is Better? Signaling Paradoxes in Performance-Based Advertising," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1217-1227, June.
    20. Jun Tao & Qian Chen & James W. Snyder & Arava Sai Kumar & Amirhossein Meisami & Lingzhou Xue, 2025. "A Graphical Point Process Framework for Understanding Removal Effects in Multi-Touch Attribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7312-7332, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2026_742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.