IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/fsug24/32.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stuck in the middle? Occupation-speci

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Liégey

    (Université de Strasbourg)

Abstract

How do middle-skilled workers trade off wages against commuting time, as compared with high- and low-skilled ones? In this presentation, we leverage a quasi-exhaustive panel of jobs in France to explore how unobserved heterogeneity can help characterize workers' trade-off at the metropolitan area level. We use estimated worker- and employer-

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Liégey, 2024. "Stuck in the middle? Occupation-speci," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 32, Stata Users Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:boc:fsug24:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/frsug2024/France24_Liegey.pdf
    File Function: presentation materials
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ignacio A. Inoa & Nathalie Picard & Andr� de Palma, 2015. "Effect of an Accessibility Measure in a Model for Choice of Residential Location, Workplace, and Type of Employment," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 4-36, March.
    2. Donald R. Davis & Eric Mengus & Tomasz K. Michalski, 2020. "Labor Market Polarization and The Great Urban Divergence," NBER Working Papers 26955, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxime Liegey & Nathalie Picard, 2024. "Stuck in the middle? Occupation-specific commute-wage trade-off at the metropolitan level," Working Papers of BETA 2024-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Nathalie Picard & Andre de Palma & Sophie Dantan, 2013. "Intra-Household Discrete Choice Models Of Mode Choice And Residential Location," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 40(3).
    3. André de Palma & Nathalie Picard & Ignacio Inoa, 2014. "Discrete choice decision-making with multiple decision-makers within the household," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 16, pages 363-382, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Sophie Dantan & Nathalie Picard, 2016. "Effect Of Borrowing Constraints On Location Choice: Evidence From The Paris Region," Working Papers hal-01294215, HAL.
    5. Lucas Javaudin & Andrea Araldo & André de Palma, 2021. "Large-Scale Allocation of Personalized Incentives," THEMA Working Papers 2021-08, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    6. Koster, Hans R.A. & Ozgen, Ceren, 2021. "Cities and tasks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Ignacio A. INOA & Nathalie PICARD & André de PALMA, 2014. "Intra-household Decision Models of Residential and Job Location," THEMA Working Papers 2014-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    8. Yunxi Bai & Jusheng Song & Shanshan Wu & Wei Wang & Jacqueline T. Y. Lo & S. M. Lo, 2020. "Comparing the Impacts of Location Attributes on Residents’ Preferences and Residential Values in Compact Cities: A Case Study of Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Lucas Javaudin & Andrea Araldo & André de Palma, 2023. "Personalized Incentives with Constrained Regulator’s Budget," THEMA Working Papers 2023-15, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    10. Amirhesam Badeanlou & Andrea Araldo & Marco Diana & Vincent Gauthier, 2022. "Equity Scores for Public Transit Lines from Open-Data and Accessibility Measures," Papers 2210.00128, arXiv.org.
    11. Jan Eeckhout & Christoph Hedtrich & Roberto Pinheiro, 2021. "IT and Urban Polarization," Working Papers 21-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    12. Teulings, Coen & Ossokina, Ioulia V. & de Groot, Henri L.F., 2014. "Welfare Benefits of Agglomeration and Worker Heterogeneity," IZA Discussion Papers 8382, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Fabian Eckert & Sharat Ganapati & Conor Walsh, 2020. "Urban-Biased Growth: A Macroeconomic Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 8705, CESifo.
    14. Arntz, Melanie & Ivanov, Boris & Pohlan, Laura, 2022. "Regional Structural Change and the Effects of Job Loss," IZA Discussion Papers 15313, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Althoff, Lukas & Eckert, Fabian & Ganapati, Sharat & Walsh, Conor, 2022. "The Geography of Remote Work," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Bouzouina, Louafi & Baraklianos, Ioannis & Bonnel, Patrick & Aissaoui, Hind, 2021. "Renters vs owners: The impact of accessibility on residential location choice. Evidence from Lyon urban area, France (1999–2013)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 72-84.
    17. De Groot, Henri L.F. & Ossokina, Ioulia V. & Teulings, Coen N, 2014. "Welfare Benefits of Agglomeration and Worker Heterogeneity," CEPR Discussion Papers 10216, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Sophie Dantan & Nathalie Picard, 2019. "Borrowing constraints and location choice - Evidence from the Paris Region," THEMA Working Papers 2019-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    19. Mathieu P.A. Steijn, 2024. "The persistence and nature of the labor reallocation shock during the COVID-19 crisis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-047/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Croce, Giuseppe & Piselli, Paolo, 2024. "Are the best jobs created in largest cities? Evidence from Italy 1993-2016," MPRA Paper 121228, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:fsug24:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.