IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auu/wpaper/008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constructing a General Theory of Life: The Dynamics of Human and Non-human Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Graeme Donald Snooks

Abstract

The ultimate objective of theorists studying living systems is to construct a general theory of life that can explain and predict the dynamics of both human and nonhuman systems. Yet little progress has been made in this endeavour. Why? Because of the inappropriate methods adopted by complexity theorists. By assuming that the supply-side physics model – in which local interactions are said to give rise to the emergence of order and complexity – could be transferred either entirely (social physics) or partially (agent-based models, or ABMs) from the physical to the life sciences, we have distorted reality and, thereby, delayed the construction of a general dynamic theory of living systems. Is there a solution? Yes, but only if we abandon the deductive and analogical methods of complexity theorists and adopt the inductive method. With this approach it is possible to construct a realist and demand-side general dynamic theory, as in the case of the dynamic-strategy theory presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Graeme Donald Snooks, 2009. "Constructing a General Theory of Life: The Dynamics of Human and Non-human Systems," GDSC Working Papers 008, Institute of Global Dynamic Systems.
    • Handle: RePEc:auu:wpaper:008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sites.google.com/site/institutegds/home/workingpapers/WP008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2000. "An End to Progress and Liberty?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Global Crisis Makers, chapter 6, pages 89-111, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2000. "The Global Crisis Makers," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-333-97798-9, October.
    3. Robert Axelrod, 1997. "Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences," Working Papers 97-05-048, Santa Fe Institute.
    4. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2007. "Self-organisation or Selfcreation? From Social Physics to Realist Dynamics," CEPR Discussion Papers 546, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    5. Graeme Donald Snooks, 1993. "Economics without Time," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37381-5, October.
    6. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2008. "Australia'S Long-Run Economic Strategy, Performance, And Policy: A New Dynamic Perspective," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 27(3), pages 208-232, September.
    2. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2007. "A General Theory of Complex Living Systems: Exploring the Demand Side of Dynamics," CEPR Discussion Papers 563, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    3. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2009. "Climate Mitigation or Technological Revolution? A Critical Choice of Futures," GDSC Working Papers 010, Institute of Global Dynamic Systems.
    4. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2006. "Dynamics Downunder: Australian Economic Strategy and Performance from the Palaeolithic to the Twenty-first Century," CEPR Discussion Papers 539, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    5. Günter Küppers & Johannes Lenhard, 2005. "Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-3.
    6. Andrew W. Bausch, 2014. "Evolving intergroup cooperation," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 369-393, December.
    7. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.
    8. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    9. Jager, Wander & Janssen, Marco A., 2001. "Diffusion processes in demographic transitions: a prospect on using multi agent simulation to explore the role of cognitive strategies and social interactions," Research Report 01B40, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Edoardo Mollona & David Hales, 2006. "Knowledge-Based Jobs and the Boundaries of Firms Agent-based Simulation of Firms Learning and Workforce Skill Set Dynamics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 35-62, February.
    11. Kim Polistina, 2018. "Are neoliberalist behaviours reflective of bullying? New perspectives on influences on sustainability and global citizenship," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 175-196, February.
    12. Graeme Snooks, 2008. "The Irrational “War on Inflation”: Why Inflation Targeting is Both Socially Unacceptable and Economically Untenable," GDSC Working Papers 001, Institute of Global Dynamic Systems.
    13. Francis Tseng & Fei Liu & Bernardo Alves Furtado, 2017. "Humans of Simulated New York (HOSNY): an exploratory comprehensive model of city life," Papers 1703.05240, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    14. David Hales, 1998. "An Open Mind is Not an Empty Mind: Experiments in the Meta-Noosphere," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 1(4), pages 1-2.
    15. Graeme Donald Snooks, 2009. "The New Global Crisis Makers: Economic Intervention and the Loss of Strategic Leadership," GDSC Working Papers 009, Institute of Global Dynamic Systems.
    16. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:01b40 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Davis, Jon S. & Pesch, Heather L., 2013. "Fraud dynamics and controls in organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 469-483.
    19. Jan Kwakkel & Gönenç Yücel, 2014. "An Exploratory Analysis of the Dutch Electricity System in Transition," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(4), pages 670-685, December.
    20. Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier, 2006. "A policy approach to the environmental impacts of technological lock-in," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 717-742, July.
    21. Christopher J Lynch & Saikou Y Diallo & Hamdi Kavak & Jose J Padilla, 2020. "A content analysis-based approach to explore simulation verification and identify its current challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-33, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    complex living systems; unified theory; general theory of life; dynamics. Demand-side; methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auu:wpaper:008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Drew Treasure (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eganuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.